• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种族、民族和医学院校隶属关系是否与 NIH R01 类型 1 医师研究员奖的概率有关?

Are race, ethnicity, and medical school affiliation associated with NIH R01 type 1 award probability for physician investigators?

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2012 Nov;87(11):1516-24. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826d726b.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826d726b
PMID:23018334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3485449/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the relationship among National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 Type 1 applicant degree, institution type, and race/ethnicity, and application award probability.

METHOD

The authors used 2000-2006 data from the NIH IMPAC II grants database and other sources to determine which individual and institutional characteristics of applicants may affect the probability of applications being awarded funding. They used descriptive statistics and probit models to estimate correlations between race/ethnicity, degree (MD or PhD), and institution type (medical school or other institution), and application award probability, controlling for a large set of observable characteristics.

RESULTS

Applications from medical schools were significantly more likely than those from other institutions to receive funding, as were applications from MDs versus PhDs. Overall, applications from blacks and Asians were less likely than those from whites to be awarded funding; however, among applications from MDs at medical schools, there was no difference in funding probability between whites and Asians, and the difference between blacks and whites decreased to 7.8%. The inclusion of human subjects significantly decreased the likelihood of receiving funding.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with applications from whites, applications from blacks have a lower probability of being awarded R01 Type 1 funding, regardless of the investigator's degree. However, funding probability is increased for applications with MD investigators and for those from medical schools. To some degree, these advantages combine so that applications from black MDs at medical schools have the smallest difference in funding probability compared with those from whites.

摘要

目的

分析美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)R01 类型 1 申请人类别、机构类型与种族/民族的关系,以及申请获得资助的概率。

方法

作者使用 NIH IMPAC II 拨款数据库及其他来源的 2000-2006 年数据,确定申请人的个体和机构特征中哪些可能影响申请获得资助的概率。他们采用描述性统计和概率模型来估计种族/民族、学位(医学博士或博士)和机构类型(医学院或其他机构)与申请资助概率之间的相关性,同时控制了大量可观测的特征。

结果

医学院的申请比其他机构更有可能获得资助,医学博士的申请比博士的申请更有可能获得资助。总体而言,与白人相比,黑人及亚洲人的申请获得资助的概率较低;然而,在医学院的医学博士申请中,白人和亚洲人之间的资助概率没有差异,而黑人和白人之间的差异缩小到 7.8%。包含人体受试者显著降低了获得资助的可能性。

结论

与白人的申请相比,黑人的申请获得 R01 类型 1 资助的概率较低,而不论研究者的学位如何。然而,具有医学博士学位的研究者和来自医学院的申请更有可能获得资助。在某种程度上,这些优势结合起来,使得来自医学院的黑人医学博士的申请与白人的申请在资助概率方面的差异最小。

相似文献

1
Are race, ethnicity, and medical school affiliation associated with NIH R01 type 1 award probability for physician investigators?种族、民族和医学院校隶属关系是否与 NIH R01 类型 1 医师研究员奖的概率有关?
Acad Med. 2012 Nov;87(11):1516-24. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826d726b.
2
Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health R01 Research Awards: Is There Evidence of a Double Bind for Women of Color?性别、种族/族裔与美国国立卫生研究院R01研究奖:有色人种女性是否存在双重束缚的证据?
Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1098-107. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001278.
3
Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards.种族、民族与 NIH 研究奖项。
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):1015-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1196783.
4
A Ten-Year Analysis of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding for Anesthesiology Research in United States Medical Schools.美国医学院麻醉学研究中近期美国国立卫生研究院资助的十年分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Jul;36(7):1844-1855. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
5
Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity.学术医学中心初级教员获得美国国立卫生研究院R01资助的性别差异:人脉、职级和研究生产力的作用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Oct;26(10):1086-1093. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6102. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
6
National Institutes of Health Diversity Supplement Awards by Medical School.国立卫生研究院按医学院划分的多样性补充奖。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Apr;38(5):1175-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07849-y. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
7
Comparing National Institutes of Health funding of emergency medicine to four medical specialties.比较美国国立卫生研究院对急诊医学与四个医学专业的资助。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;18(9):1001-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01138.x. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
8
Gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty.医学院教员研究基金申请与资助结果中的性别差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Mar;17(2):207-14. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0412.
9
New physician-investigators receiving National Institutes of Health research project grants: a historical perspective on the "endangered species".获得美国国立卫生研究院研究项目资助的新医生-研究人员:对“濒危物种”的历史视角
JAMA. 2007 Jun 13;297(22):2496-501. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.22.2496.
10
Physician-scientists in obstetrics and gynecology: predictors of success in obtaining independent research funding.妇产科领域的医师科学家:获得独立研究资金成功与否的预测因素
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):84.e1-84.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing diversity in the nutrition, obesity, and diabetes biomedical workforce: the BRIDGES consortium.增加营养、肥胖和糖尿病生物医学领域劳动力的多样性:BRIDGES联盟。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Feb;121(2):265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.011. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
Biomedical research grant resubmission: rates and factors related to success - a scoping review.生物医学研究资助项目的重新提交:成功率及相关因素——一项范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 14;14(11):e089927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089927.
3
Research Priorities in Pediatric Asthma Morbidity: Addressing the Impacts of Systemic Racism on Children with Asthma in the United States. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

本文引用的文献

1
Science funding. NSF's 'Big Pitch' tests anonymized grant reviews.科学资助。美国国家科学基金会的“大型推介会”对匿名资助评审进行测试。
Science. 2012 May 25;336(6084):969-70. doi: 10.1126/science.336.6084.969.
2
Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards.种族、民族与 NIH 研究奖项。
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):1015-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1196783.
3
Sociology. Weaving a richer tapestry in biomedical science.社会学。为生物医学科学编织一幅更为丰富多彩的画卷。
儿科哮喘发病率研究重点:解决美国哮喘儿童所面临的系统性种族主义问题。美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Oct;21(10):1349-1364. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-767ST.
4
Race and Sex Disparities Among Emergency Medicine Chief Residents.急诊住院医师负责人中的种族和性别差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432679. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32679.
5
Impact of discrimination on training and career of radiation oncologists in France.歧视对法国放射肿瘤学家培训与职业发展的影响。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024 Aug 13;48:100840. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100840. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Accelerating Action: Roadmap for the American Thoracic Society to Address Oppression and Health Inequity in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.加速行动:美国胸科学会解决肺部和重症医学领域压迫与健康不平等问题的路线图。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Jan;21(1):17-26. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202305-412PS.
7
Defining and Promoting Pediatric Pulmonary Health: Understanding Sleep and Ventilatory Health.定义和促进儿童肺部健康:了解睡眠和通气健康。
Pediatrics. 2023 Sep 1;152(Suppl 2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-062292D.
8
Dermatology Receives Fewer Grants Versus Other Specialties but Excels in Citation Impact in a Cross-sectional Analysis of R01 Grants 2000-2022.在2000年至2022年R01资助的横断面分析中,与其他专科相比,皮肤科获得的资助较少,但在引文影响力方面表现出色。
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023 Jul 1;13(3):e2023162. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1303a162.
9
Differences In Debt Among Postgraduate Medical Residents By Self-Designated Race And Ethnicity, 2014-19.2014-19 年,按自我认定的种族和族裔划分的研究生住院医师的债务差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Jan;42(1):63-73. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00446.
10
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Internal Medicine Residency Assessments.内科住院医师评估中的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2247649. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.47649.
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):940-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1211704.
4
Activities, productivity, and compensation of men and women in the life sciences.生命科学领域中男性和女性的活动、生产力和薪酬。
Acad Med. 2010 Apr;85(4):631-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2b095.
5
NIH budget. Peer review under stress.美国国立卫生研究院预算。压力下的同行评审。
Science. 2007 Apr 20;316(5823):358-9. doi: 10.1126/science.316.5823.358.
6
The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.科学中的马太效应。对科学的奖励和交流系统进行了探讨。
Science. 1968 Jan 5;159(3810):56-63.