Suppr超能文献

数据安全港与信任:共同理解用于安全和伦理健康研究治理的可信研究平台。

Data Safe Havens and Trust: Toward a Common Understanding of Trusted Research Platforms for Governing Secure and Ethical Health Research.

机构信息

Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Jun 21;4(2):e22. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5571.

Abstract

In parallel with the advances in big data-driven clinical research, the data safe haven concept has evolved over the last decade. It has led to the development of a framework to support the secure handling of health care information used for clinical research that balances compliance with legal and regulatory controls and ethical requirements while engaging with the public as a partner in its governance. We describe the evolution of 4 separately developed clinical research platforms into services throughout the United Kingdom-wide Farr Institute and their common deployment features in practice. The Farr Institute is a case study from which we propose a common definition of data safe havens as trusted platforms for clinical academic research. We use this common definition to discuss the challenges and dilemmas faced by the clinical academic research community, to help promote a consistent understanding of them and how they might best be handled in practice. We conclude by questioning whether the common definition represents a safe and trustworthy model for conducting clinical research that can stand the test of time and ongoing technical advances while paying heed to evolving public and professional concerns.

摘要

随着大数据驱动的临床研究的进步,数据安全港的概念在过去十年中也得到了发展。它催生了一种框架,以支持安全处理用于临床研究的医疗信息,在符合法律、法规控制和伦理要求的同时,与公众合作,将其作为治理的伙伴。我们描述了 4 个分别开发的临床研究平台如何在整个英国范围内的 Farr 研究所发展成为服务,并描述了它们在实践中的共同部署特点。Farr 研究所是一个案例研究,从中我们提出了数据安全港的共同定义,即临床学术研究的可信平台。我们使用这个共同的定义来讨论临床学术研究界所面临的挑战和困境,以帮助促进对它们的一致理解,以及在实践中如何最好地处理它们。最后我们质疑这个共同的定义是否代表了一个安全和值得信赖的临床研究模型,这个模型能够经受住时间和持续技术进步的考验,同时关注不断变化的公众和专业人士的担忧。

相似文献

9
Data Safe Havens in health research and healthcare.健康研究与医疗保健中的数据安全港
Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 15;31(20):3241-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv279. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

10
Privacy preserving data visualizations.隐私保护数据可视化
EPJ Data Sci. 2021;10(1):2. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00257-4. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

4
A multi-institution evaluation of clinical profile anonymization.多机构临床资料匿名化评估
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e131-7. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv154. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
6
Combining Health Data Uses to Ignite Health System Learning.整合健康数据用途以激发卫生系统学习。
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(6):479-87. doi: 10.3414/ME15-01-0064. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
7
The ethics weathervane.道德风向标。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Sep 4;16:58. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0054-4.
8
Data Safe Havens in health research and healthcare.健康研究与医疗保健中的数据安全港
Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 15;31(20):3241-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv279. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
10
Selling health data: de-identification, privacy, and speech.出售健康数据:去识别化、隐私与言论。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015 Jul;24(3):256-71. doi: 10.1017/S0963180114000589.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验