Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Jun 21;4(2):e22. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5571.
In parallel with the advances in big data-driven clinical research, the data safe haven concept has evolved over the last decade. It has led to the development of a framework to support the secure handling of health care information used for clinical research that balances compliance with legal and regulatory controls and ethical requirements while engaging with the public as a partner in its governance. We describe the evolution of 4 separately developed clinical research platforms into services throughout the United Kingdom-wide Farr Institute and their common deployment features in practice. The Farr Institute is a case study from which we propose a common definition of data safe havens as trusted platforms for clinical academic research. We use this common definition to discuss the challenges and dilemmas faced by the clinical academic research community, to help promote a consistent understanding of them and how they might best be handled in practice. We conclude by questioning whether the common definition represents a safe and trustworthy model for conducting clinical research that can stand the test of time and ongoing technical advances while paying heed to evolving public and professional concerns.
随着大数据驱动的临床研究的进步,数据安全港的概念在过去十年中也得到了发展。它催生了一种框架,以支持安全处理用于临床研究的医疗信息,在符合法律、法规控制和伦理要求的同时,与公众合作,将其作为治理的伙伴。我们描述了 4 个分别开发的临床研究平台如何在整个英国范围内的 Farr 研究所发展成为服务,并描述了它们在实践中的共同部署特点。Farr 研究所是一个案例研究,从中我们提出了数据安全港的共同定义,即临床学术研究的可信平台。我们使用这个共同的定义来讨论临床学术研究界所面临的挑战和困境,以帮助促进对它们的一致理解,以及在实践中如何最好地处理它们。最后我们质疑这个共同的定义是否代表了一个安全和值得信赖的临床研究模型,这个模型能够经受住时间和持续技术进步的考验,同时关注不断变化的公众和专业人士的担忧。