• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用一种新的多维“镜像”测量方法评估职场关系文明(WRC)。

Assessing Workplace Relational Civility (WRC) with a New Multidimensional "Mirror" Measure.

作者信息

Di Fabio Annamaria, Gori Alessio

机构信息

Department of Education and Psychology (Psychology Section), University of Florence Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 20;7:890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00890. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00890
PMID:27378985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4913104/
Abstract

This article first introduces a new psychological construct and then presents the psychometric properties of a new multidimensional measure for assessing workplace relational civility (WRC). This new self-report mirror measure has two specular sections (Part A-Me with others; Part B-Others with me) that can assess individuals' relational patterns regarding civility and that can help reduce the bias in the assessment process. The results of exploratory factor analysis revealed a factor structure with three robust dimensions [relational decency (RD), relational culture (RCu), and relational readiness (RR)] exhibiting good values of internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis showed, in turn, a good fit of the model to the data. The correlations between the sections of the measure and the 11 instruments used were significant and in the expected directions. These results suggest that this new, brief mirror measure for assessing WRC can be easily employed in different organizational contexts to open different typologies of actions on the basis of the three dimensions, thereby facilitating the construction of a safer and more decent relational work environment.

摘要

本文首先介绍一种新的心理结构,然后呈现一种用于评估职场关系文明(WRC)的新的多维测量工具的心理测量特性。这种新的自我报告镜像测量工具具有两个镜像部分(A部分——我与他人;B部分——他人与我),可以评估个体在文明方面的关系模式,有助于减少评估过程中的偏差。探索性因素分析结果揭示了一个具有三个稳健维度[关系得体(RD)、关系文化(RCu)和关系准备度(RR)]的因素结构,内部一致性值良好。验证性因素分析则表明模型与数据拟合良好。该测量工具各部分与所使用的11种工具之间的相关性显著且符合预期方向。这些结果表明,这种用于评估WRC的新的简短镜像测量工具可以轻松应用于不同的组织环境,根据这三个维度开展不同类型的行动,从而促进构建一个更安全、更得体的关系型工作环境。

相似文献

1
Assessing Workplace Relational Civility (WRC) with a New Multidimensional "Mirror" Measure.使用一种新的多维“镜像”测量方法评估职场关系文明(WRC)。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 20;7:890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00890. eCollection 2016.
2
The Challenge of Fostering Healthy Organizations: An Empirical Study on the Role of Workplace Relational Civility in Acceptance of Change and Well-Being.培育健康组织的挑战:关于职场关系文明在变革接受度和幸福感中作用的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 21;7:1748. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01748. eCollection 2016.
3
Predisposition to Change Is Linked to Job Satisfaction: Assessing the Mediation Roles of Workplace Relation Civility and Insight.改变倾向与工作满意度相关:评估职场关系文明和洞察力的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 23;17(6):2141. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062141.
4
Assessing workplace civility: Validity and 1-year test-retest reliability of a Japanese version of the CREW Civility Scale.评估职场文明:日本版CREW文明量表的效度及1年重测信度
J Occup Health. 2022 Jan;64(1):e12332. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12332.
5
Advancing Workplace Civility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of definitions, measurements, and associated factors.促进职场文明:对定义、测量方法及相关因素的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 9;14:1277188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1277188. eCollection 2023.
6
High Entrepreneurship, Leadership, and Professionalism (HELP): A New Resource for Workers in the 21st Century.高创业精神、领导力与专业素养(HELP):21世纪劳动者的新资源。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 28;9:1480. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01480. eCollection 2018.
7
Fighting Incivility in the Workplace for Women and for All Workers: The Challenge of Primary Prevention.为职场女性及所有员工对抗不文明行为:一级预防的挑战。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 8;10:1805. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01805. eCollection 2019.
8
Development and Psychometric Testing of the Workplace Civility Index: A Reliable Tool for Measuring Civility in the Workplace.职场文明指数的开发与心理测量测试:一种测量职场文明程度的可靠工具。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2018 Sep 1;49(9):400-406. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20180813-05.
9
Relational Climate in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation.工作场所中的关系氛围:维度、测量与验证
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 13;11:85. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00085. eCollection 2020.
10
Civility norms, safety climate, and safety outcomes: a preliminary investigation.文明规范、安全氛围与安全成果:一项初步调查。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2014 Oct;19(4):437-52. doi: 10.1037/a0037110. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Positive Relational Management and Occupational Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Flourishing and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors.积极关系管理与职业幸福感:蓬勃发展和组织公民行为的中介作用。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):3039-3055. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14120199.
2
Social Support and Its Impact on Job Satisfaction and Emotional Exhaustion.社会支持及其对工作满意度和情感耗竭的影响。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Dec 1;13(12):2827-2840. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13120195.
3
Advancing Workplace Civility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of definitions, measurements, and associated factors.促进职场文明:对定义、测量方法及相关因素的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 9;14:1277188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1277188. eCollection 2023.
4
Human capital sustainability leadership: From personality traits to positive relational management.人力资本可持续性领导力:从人格特质到积极关系管理。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 19;14:1110974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1110974. eCollection 2023.
5
The Influence of Health-Promoting Leadership on Employees' Positive Workplace Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Employability and the Moderating Role of Workplace Civility.促进健康的领导力对员工积极工作场所结果的影响:就业能力的中介作用和职场礼仪的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 19;19(22):15300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215300.
6
Towards Meaning in Life: A Path Analysis Exploring the Mediation of Career Adaptability in the Associations of Self-Esteem with Presence of Meaning and Search for Meaning.追寻生命意义:职业适应能力在自尊与意义感和意义寻求的关系中的中介作用的路径分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;19(19):11901. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911901.
7
Satisfaction with life in workers: A chained mediation model investigating the roles of resilience, career adaptability, self-efficacy, and years of education.工人对生活的满意度:一个链式中介模型,探究心理韧性、职业适应性、自我效能感和受教育年限的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 23;13:1011093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1011093. eCollection 2022.
8
Insight orientation scale: A promising tool for organizational outcomes-A psychometric analysis using item response theory.洞察取向量表:一种对组织成果有前景的工具——使用项目反应理论的心理测量分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:987931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987931. eCollection 2022.
9
Gratitude in Organizations: Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Gratitude Resentment and Appreciation Test-Revised Short (GRAT-RS) in Workers.组织中的感恩之情:工作者感恩-怨恨-欣赏量表修订短版(GRAT-RS)意大利语版的心理测量学特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 4;19(17):11084. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711084.
10
The Sustainable Development Goals Psychological Inventory: A Network Analysis in Italian University Students.可持续发展目标心理测评:意大利大学生的网络分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 27;19(17):10675. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710675.

本文引用的文献

1
The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity.《幸福感问卷:心理测量特性、人口统计学比较及效度证据》
J Posit Psychol. 2010;5(1):41-61. doi: 10.1080/17439760903435208. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
2
Developing a New Instrument for Assessing Acceptance of Change.开发一种评估对变革接受度的新工具。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 30;7:802. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00802. eCollection 2016.
3
Using a Transdisciplinary Interpretive Lens to Broaden Reflections on Alleviating Poverty and Promoting Decent Work.运用跨学科解释视角拓宽对减贫与促进体面工作的思考。
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 12;7:503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00503. eCollection 2016.
4
Marginalization and Precariat: The Challenge of Intensifying Life Construction Intervention.边缘化与不稳定群体:强化生活构建干预的挑战
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 30;7:444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00444. eCollection 2016.
5
Decent Work: A Psychological Perspective.体面工作:心理学视角
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 24;7:407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00407. eCollection 2016.
6
From Decent Work to Decent Lives: Positive Self and Relational Management (PS&RM) in the Twenty-First Century.从体面工作到体面生活:21世纪的积极自我与关系管理(PS&RM)
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 23;7:361. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00361. eCollection 2016.
7
Green Positive Guidance and Green Positive Life Counseling for Decent Work and Decent Lives: Some Empirical Results.体面工作与体面生活的绿色积极引导和绿色积极生活咨询:一些实证结果。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 2;7:261. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00261. eCollection 2016.
8
Preparation for Meaningful Work and Life: Urban High School Youth's Reflections on Work-Based Learning 1 Year Post-Graduation.为有意义的工作和生活做准备:城市高中青年毕业后一年对基于工作的学习的反思
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 26;7:286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00286. eCollection 2016.
9
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
10
Factors Influencing Four Rules For Determining The Number Of Components To Retain.影响确定保留成分数量的四条规则的因素。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1982 Apr 1;17(2):253-69. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1702_5.