Fondi Klemens, Aschinger Gerold C, Bata Ahmed M, Wozniak Piotr A, Liao Liang, Seidel Gerald, Doblhoff-Dier Veronika, Schmidl Doreen, Garhöfer Gerhard, Werkmeister René M, Schmetterer Leopold
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 3Institute of Applied Physics, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jul 1;57(9):OCT121-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18476.
To compare retinal vessel calibers extracted from phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography (OCT) images with vessel calibers as obtained from the Retinal Vessel Analyzer (RVA).
Data from previously published studies in 13 healthy subjects breathing room air (n = 214 vessels) and 7 subjects breathing 100% oxygen (n = 101 vessels) were used. Vessel calibers from OCT phase images were measured vertically along the optical axis by three independent graders. The data from RVA fundus images were corrected for magnification to obtain absolute values.
The average vessel diameter as obtained from OCT images during normoxia was lower than from RVA images (83.8 ± 28.2 μm versus 86.6 ± 28.0 μm, P < 0.001). The same phenomenon was observed during 100% oxygen breathing (OCT: 81.0 ± 22.4 μm, RVA: 85.5 ± 26.0 μm; P = 0.001). Although the agreement between the two methods was generally high, the difference in individual vessels could be as high as 40%. These differences were neither dependent on absolute vessel size nor preferably found in specific subjects. Interobserver differences between OCT evaluators were much lower than differences between the techniques.
Extracting vessel calibers from OCT phase images may be an attractive approach to overcome some of the problems associated with fundus imaging. The source of differences in vessel caliber between the two methods remains to be investigated. In addition, it remains unclear whether OCT-based vessel caliber measurement is superior to fundus camera-based imaging in risk stratification for systemic or ocular disease. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00914407, NCT02531399.).
比较从相敏光学相干断层扫描(OCT)图像中提取的视网膜血管管径与视网膜血管分析仪(RVA)获得的血管管径。
使用先前发表的针对13名呼吸室内空气的健康受试者(n = 214条血管)和7名呼吸100%氧气的受试者(n = 101条血管)的研究数据。由三名独立的分级人员沿光轴垂直测量OCT相位图像中的血管管径。对RVA眼底图像的数据进行放大校正以获得绝对值。
在常氧状态下,从OCT图像获得的平均血管直径低于RVA图像(83.8±28.2μm对86.6±28.0μm,P<0.001)。在呼吸100%氧气期间也观察到相同现象(OCT:81.0±22.4μm,RVA:85.5±26.0μm;P = 0.001)。尽管两种方法之间的一致性总体较高,但个别血管的差异可能高达40%。这些差异既不依赖于血管的绝对大小,也并非在特定受试者中更常见。OCT评估者之间的观察者间差异远低于两种技术之间的差异。
从OCT相位图像中提取血管管径可能是克服一些与眼底成像相关问题的有吸引力的方法。两种方法之间血管管径差异的来源仍有待研究。此外,基于OCT的血管管径测量在全身或眼部疾病风险分层中是否优于基于眼底相机的成像仍不清楚。(ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT00914407,NCT02531399。)