Institute of Health Technologies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
SERI-NTU Advanced Ocular Engineering (STANCE), Singapore.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;105(3):426-431. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316111. Epub 2020 May 27.
BACKGROUND/IMS: To compare the retinal vessel diameter measurements obtained from the swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA; Plex Elite 9000, Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA) and adaptive optics ophthalmoscope (AOO; RTX1, Imagine Eyes, France).
Fifteen healthy subjects, 67% women, mean age (SD) 30.87 (6.19) years, were imaged using OCTA and AOO by a single experienced operator on the same day. Each eye was scanned using two OCTA protocols (3×3 mm and 9×9 mm) and two to five AOO scans (1.2×1.2 mm). The OCTA and AOO scans were scaled to the same pixel resolution. Two independent graders measured the vessel diameter at the same location on the region-of-interest in the three coregistered scans. Differences in vessel diameter measurements between the scans were assessed.
The inter-rater agreement was excellent for vessel diameter measurement in both OCTA protocols (ICC=0.92) and AOO (ICC=0.98). The measured vessel diameter was widest from the OCTA 3×3 mm (55.2±16.3 µm), followed by OCTA 9×9 mm (54.7±14.3 µm) and narrowest by the AOO (50.5±15.6 µm; p<0.001). Measurements obtained from both OCTA protocols were significantly wider than the AOO scan (OCTA 3×3 mm: mean difference Δ=4.7 µm, p<0.001; OCTA 9×9 mm: Δ=4.2 µm, p<0.001). For vessels >45 µm, it appeared to be larger in OCTA 3×3 mm scan than the 9×9 mm scan (Δ=1.9 µm; p=0.005), while vessels <45 µm appeared smaller in OCTA 3×3 mm scan (Δ=-1.3 µm; p=0.009) CONCLUSIONS: The diameter of retinal vessels measured from OCTA scans were generally wider than that obtained from AOO scans. Different OCTA scan protocols may affect the vessel diameter measurements. This needs to be considered when OCTA measures such as vessel density are calculated.
背景/IMS:比较扫频源光相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA;Plex Elite 9000,卡尔蔡司医疗技术公司,美国)和自适应光学眼底镜(AOO;RTX1,Imagine Eyes,法国)获得的视网膜血管直径测量值。
15 名健康受试者,女性占 67%,平均年龄(标准差)为 30.87(6.19)岁,由同一位经验丰富的操作者在同一天使用 OCTA 和 AOO 进行成像。每只眼睛使用两种 OCTA 方案(3×3mm 和 9×9mm)和两种至五种 AOO 扫描(1.2×1.2mm)进行扫描。OCTA 和 AOO 扫描被缩放为相同的像素分辨率。两名独立的评分者在三个配准的扫描中的相同感兴趣区域测量血管直径。评估扫描之间血管直径测量值的差异。
两种 OCTA 方案(ICC=0.92)和 AOO(ICC=0.98)的血管直径测量值的组内一致性均极好。从 OCTA 3×3mm(55.2±16.3µm)获得的测量血管直径最宽,其次是 OCTA 9×9mm(54.7±14.3µm),最窄的是 AOO(50.5±15.6µm;p<0.001)。两种 OCTA 方案获得的测量值均明显宽于 AOO 扫描(OCTA 3×3mm:平均差值Δ=4.7µm,p<0.001;OCTA 9×9mm:Δ=4.2µm,p<0.001)。对于>45µm 的血管,OCTA 3×3mm 扫描中的血管似乎比 9×9mm 扫描中的血管更大(Δ=1.9µm;p=0.005),而<45µm 的血管在 OCTA 3×3mm 扫描中显得更小(Δ=-1.3µm;p=0.009)。
从 OCTA 扫描中测量的视网膜血管直径通常比从 AOO 扫描中获得的直径更宽。不同的 OCTA 扫描方案可能会影响血管直径的测量值。在计算血管密度等 OCTA 测量值时需要考虑这一点。