Capolongo Stefano, Lemaire Nina, Oppio Alessandra, Buffoli Maddalena, Roue Le Gall Anne
Department of Architecture, Built environment and Construction engineering (ABC), University Politecnico di Milano, Milan.
Département santé-environnement-travail et génie sanitaire (DSETGS), Ecole des hautes études en santé publique (EHESP), France.
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Mar-Apr;40(3-4):257-64. doi: 10.19191/EP16.3-4.P257.093.
In the last decades a growing attention has been paid to the relationship between urban planning and public health. The introduction of the social model of health has stressed the importance of the determinants of health such as socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental conditions, in addition to living and working conditions. Starting from the assumption that urban planning plays a crucial role for enhancing healthy lifestyles and environments, the paper describes two different approaches to include health issues into land use plans and urban development projects. Two different evaluation tools, defined according to the Italian and French legal framework, have been compared in order to find out whether they could be considered as an innovative answer to the instance of creating a more effective cross field of work and training among urban planners and public health professionals.
在过去几十年里，城市规划与公共卫生之间的关系受到了越来越多的关注。健康社会模式的引入强调了健康决定因素的重要性，除了生活和工作条件外，还包括社会经济、文化和环境条件。基于城市规划在促进健康生活方式和环境方面发挥关键作用这一假设，本文描述了将健康问题纳入土地利用规划和城市发展项目的两种不同方法。根据意大利和法国的法律框架定义了两种不同的评估工具，并进行了比较，以确定它们是否可被视为对在城市规划师和公共卫生专业人员之间创建更有效的跨领域工作和培训需求的创新性回应。
