Warren Carol
Asia Research Centre, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
Hum Ecol Interdiscip J. 2016;44:329-339. doi: 10.1007/s10745-016-9832-y. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
This paper concerns resource governance in a remote Balinese coastal community, which faces severe environmental challenges due to overexploitation and habitat destruction. It explores some of the issues raised in 'social capital' debates regarding leadership and public participation toward sustainable natural resource governance. Given the strength of Balinese customary law and the high degree of participation required in the ritual-social domain, Bali represents a model context for examining these issues. Through a case study of destructive resource exploitation and evolving rules-in-use, this paper analyses the ambiguous role of 'bonding' social capital and the complexities of negotiating collective action on environmental problems where conflicting interests and dense social ties make local action difficult. The paper finds that a more complex appreciation of vertical (authority) and horizontal (solidarity) relationships between leaders and ordinary villagers is required, and that a more nuanced institutional bricolage and exploratory scenario approach to analysis of evolving rules in use would enhance associated policy interventions.
本文关注巴厘岛一个偏远沿海社区的资源治理,该社区因过度开发和栖息地破坏面临严峻的环境挑战。它探讨了“社会资本”辩论中提出的一些关于领导力和公众参与可持续自然资源治理的问题。鉴于巴厘岛习惯法的影响力以及仪式 - 社会领域所需的高度参与度,巴厘岛是研究这些问题的一个典型背景。通过对破坏性资源开发和不断演变的实际使用规则的案例研究,本文分析了“粘合性”社会资本的模糊作用,以及在存在利益冲突和紧密社会关系导致地方行动困难的情况下,就环境问题协商集体行动的复杂性。本文发现,需要对领导者与普通村民之间的垂直(权威)和水平(团结)关系有更复杂的理解,并且对不断演变的实际使用规则进行分析时,采用更细致入微的制度拼凑和探索性情景方法将增强相关的政策干预。