• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布拉德福德的“美好开端”项目:一项评估早期生活干预措施影响的实验性出生队列研究。

Born in Bradford's Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions.

作者信息

Dickerson Josie, Bird Philippa K, McEachan Rosemary R C, Pickett Kate E, Waiblinger Dagmar, Uphoff Eleonora, Mason Dan, Bryant Maria, Bywater Tracey, Bowyer-Crane Claudine, Sahota Pinki, Small Neil, Howell Michaela, Thornton Gill, Astin Melanie, Lawlor Debbie A, Wright John

机构信息

Born in Bradford, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.

Department of Health Sciences, The University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 4;15(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0
PMID:27488369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4996273/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early interventions are recognised as key to improving life chances for children and reducing inequalities in health and well-being, however there is a paucity of high quality research into the effectiveness of interventions to address childhood health and development outcomes. Planning and implementing standalone RCTs for multiple, individual interventions would be slow, cumbersome and expensive. This paper describes the protocol for an innovative experimental birth cohort: Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) that will simultaneously evaluate the impact of multiple early life interventions using efficient study designs. Better Start Bradford (BSB) has been allocated £49 million from the Big Lottery Fund to implement 22 interventions to improve outcomes for children aged 0-3 in three key areas: social and emotional development; communication and language development; and nutrition and obesity. The interventions will be implemented in three deprived and ethnically diverse inner city areas of Bradford.

METHOD

The BiBBS study aims to recruit 5000 babies, their mothers and their mothers' partners over 5 years from January 2016-December 2020. Demographic and socioeconomic information, physical and mental health, lifestyle factors and biological samples will be collected during pregnancy. Parents and children will be linked to their routine health and local authority (including education) data throughout the children's lives. Their participation in BSB interventions will also be tracked. BiBBS will test interventions using the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) approach and other quasi-experimental designs where TwiCs are neither feasible nor ethical, to evaluate these early life interventions. The effects of single interventions, and the cumulative effects of stacked (multiple) interventions on health and social outcomes during the critical early years will be measured.

DISCUSSION

The focus of the BiBBS cohort is on intervention impact rather than observation. As far as we are aware BiBBS is the world's first such experimental birth cohort study. While some risk factors for adverse health and social outcomes are increasingly well described, the solutions to tackling them remain elusive. The novel design of BiBBS can contribute much needed evidence to inform policy makers and practitioners about effective approaches to improve health and well-being for future generations.

摘要

背景

早期干预被认为是改善儿童生活机遇、减少健康和福祉方面不平等现象的关键,然而,针对改善儿童健康和发展成果的干预措施有效性的高质量研究却很匮乏。针对多种单独的干预措施开展独立的随机对照试验既缓慢、繁琐又昂贵。本文描述了一项创新的实验性出生队列研究方案:布拉德福德更好开端出生队列研究(BiBBS),该研究将采用高效的研究设计同时评估多种早期生活干预措施的影响。布拉德福德更好开端计划(BSB)已从大乐透基金获得4900万英镑,用于实施22项干预措施,以改善0至3岁儿童在三个关键领域的成果:社会和情感发展;沟通和语言发展;营养与肥胖。这些干预措施将在布拉德福德三个贫困且种族多样的市中心地区实施。

方法

BiBBS研究旨在从2016年1月至2020年12月的5年时间里招募5000名婴儿、他们的母亲及其母亲的伴侣。在孕期将收集人口统计学和社会经济信息、身心健康状况、生活方式因素以及生物样本。在孩子的整个成长过程中,父母和孩子将与他们的常规健康数据以及地方当局(包括教育)数据相链接。他们参与BSB干预措施的情况也将被跟踪。BiBBS将使用队列中的试验(TwiCs)方法以及在TwiCs不可行或不符合伦理时使用其他准实验设计来测试干预措施,以评估这些早期生活干预措施。将测量单一干预措施的效果,以及在关键的早期阶段叠加(多种)干预措施对健康和社会成果的累积影响。

讨论

BiBBS队列研究的重点是干预措施的影响而非观察。据我们所知,BiBBS是世界上首个此类实验性出生队列研究。虽然一些对健康和社会不良后果的风险因素已得到越来越多的描述,但解决这些问题的方法仍然难以捉摸。BiBBS的新颖设计可为政策制定者和从业者提供急需的证据,以了解改善后代健康和福祉的有效方法。

相似文献

1
Born in Bradford's Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions.布拉德福德的“美好开端”项目:一项评估早期生活干预措施影响的实验性出生队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 4;15(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0.
2
Is it feasible to nest a Trial within a Cohort Study (TwiCS) to evaluate an early years parenting programme? A Born in Bradford's Better Start study protocol.在队列研究中嵌套一项试验(TwiCS)以评估早期育儿计划是否可行?布拉德福德出生队列的更好开端研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Jan 30;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01441-9.
3
Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) interventional birth cohort study: Interim cohort profile.布拉德福德更佳开端(BiBBS)干预性出生队列研究:中期队列概况。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Sep 21;7:244. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18394.2. eCollection 2022.
4
Protocol for the effectiveness evaluation of an antenatal, universally offered, and remotely delivered parenting programme 'Baby Steps' on maternal outcomes: a Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) study.《“婴儿起步”产前、普遍提供和远程育儿计划对产妇结局的有效性评估方案:布拉德福德出生的更好开端(BiBBS)研究》。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;23(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15111-1.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Changes in prevalence and patterns of consanguinity in Bradford, UK  - evidence from two cohort studies.英国布拉德福德近亲结婚率及模式的变化——两项队列研究的证据
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Nov 28;9:222. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21121.2. eCollection 2024.
7
Integrating research and system-wide practice in public health: lessons learnt from Better Start Bradford.将研究与公共卫生系统实践相结合:从布拉德福德更佳开端项目中汲取的经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 4;19(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6554-2.
8
Evaluating the real-world implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership in England: a data linkage study.评估英格兰家庭护士合作模式的实际实施情况:一项数据链接研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(11):1-223. doi: 10.3310/BVDW6447.
9
Risk factors for early language delay in children within a minority ethnic, bilingual, deprived environment (Born in Bradford's Better Start): a UK community birth cohort study.少数民族、双语、贫困环境下儿童早期语言发育迟缓的风险因素(出生在布拉德福德的更好开端):英国社区出生队列研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Mar;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001764.
10
A quasi-experimental effectiveness evaluation of the 'Incredible Years Toddler' parenting programme on children's development aged 5: A study protocol.“难以置信的岁月”幼儿养育计划对 5 岁儿童发展的准实验有效性评估:研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 27;18(9):e0291557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291557. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing patterns in marriage choice and related health risk in the Pakistani heritage community in Bradford UK: a qualitative study.英国布拉德福德巴基斯坦裔社区婚姻选择模式的变化及相关健康风险:一项定性研究
Wellcome Open Res. 2025 Jun 9;9:690. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23338.2. eCollection 2024.
2
A City "Collabatory": Researchers, Commissioners and Community Members Planning Interventions Together.一个城市的“协作平台”:研究人员、专员和社区成员共同规划干预措施。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70238. doi: 10.1111/hex.70238.
3
Cohort multiple randomized controlled trial in pediatric asthma to assess the long- and short-term effects of eHealth interventions: protocol of the CIRCUS study.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a nurse-led intensive home-visitation programme for first-time teenage mothers (Building Blocks): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.由护士主导的针对首次生育少女的强化家庭访视项目(基石项目)的有效性:一项实用随机对照试验
Lancet. 2016 Jan 9;387(10014):146-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00392-X. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
2
Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential.医疗保健中的大数据分析:前景与潜力。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2014 Feb 7;2:3. doi: 10.1186/2047-2501-2-3. eCollection 2014.
3
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.
一项评估电子健康干预措施对儿童哮喘长期和短期影响的队列多重随机对照试验:CIRCUS研究方案
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17534666251323192. doi: 10.1177/17534666251323192. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
4
Changes in prevalence and patterns of consanguinity in Bradford, UK  - evidence from two cohort studies.英国布拉德福德近亲结婚率及模式的变化——两项队列研究的证据
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Nov 28;9:222. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21121.2. eCollection 2024.
5
Generation Victoria (GenV): protocol for a longitudinal birth cohort of Victorian children and their parents.维多利亚世代研究(GenV):一项针对维多利亚州儿童及其父母的纵向出生队列研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 3;25(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21108-1.
6
Unlocking the forest: An ethnographic evaluation of Forest Schools on developmental outcomes for 3-year-olds unaccustomed to woodland spaces.开启森林之旅:对森林学校对不习惯林地环境的3岁儿童发展成果的人种志评估。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Sep 9;9:519. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22851.1. eCollection 2024.
7
Children's behavioural and emotional wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from the Born in Bradford COVID-19 mixed methods longitudinal study.新冠疫情期间儿童的行为与情绪健康:来自布拉德福德出生队列新冠疫情混合方法纵向研究的结果
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Feb 15;9:36. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20752.1. eCollection 2024.
8
Randomised trials conducted using cohorts: a scoping review.使用队列进行的随机试验:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e075601. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075601.
9
Profiles of Cultural Adaptation and Parenting Approach for Childhood Obesity in Lifestyle Interventions for Families With Young Children: A Systematic Review.生活方式干预家庭中儿童肥胖症的文化适应和养育方式特征:系统评价。
Fam Community Health. 2024;47(2):95-107. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000397.
10
Is it feasible to nest a Trial within a Cohort Study (TwiCS) to evaluate an early years parenting programme? A Born in Bradford's Better Start study protocol.在队列研究中嵌套一项试验(TwiCS)以评估早期育儿计划是否可行?布拉德福德出生队列的更好开端研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Jan 30;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01441-9.
复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
4
Regression discontinuity designs are underutilized in medicine, epidemiology, and public health: a review of current and best practice.回归不连续性设计在医学、流行病学和公共卫生领域未得到充分利用:对当前和最佳实践的综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;68(2):122-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.021.
5
Regression discontinuity designs in epidemiology: causal inference without randomized trials.流行病学中的回归断点设计:无需随机试验的因果推断
Epidemiology. 2014 Sep;25(5):729-37. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000138.
6
Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers.评估复杂干预措施的挑战:已发表文献的内容分析。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 11;13:568. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-568.
7
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施:医学研究理事会新指南
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):587-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
8
Cohort Profile: the Born in Bradford multi-ethnic family cohort study.队列简介:布拉德福德出生的多民族家庭队列研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):978-91. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys112. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
9
Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance.利用自然实验评估人群健康干预措施:英国医学研究理事会新指南。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1182-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200375. Epub 2012 May 10.
10
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.倾向得分法在观察性研究中减少混杂效应的介绍
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.