Bonek Krzysztof, Głuszko Piotr
Department of Rheumatology, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland.
Reumatologia. 2016;54(3):128-35. doi: 10.5114/reum.2016.61214. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
The current methods of cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment in the course of inflammatory connective tissue diseases are a subject of considerable controversy. Comparing different methods of CV risk assessment in current rheumatoid arthritis (RA) guidelines, only a few of them recommend the use of formal risk calculators. These are the EULAR guidelines suggesting the use of SCORE and the British Society for Rheumatology guidelines performed in collaboration with NICE preferring the use of QRISK-2. Analyzing the latest American and British reports, two main concepts could be identified. The first one is to focus on risk calculators developed for the general population taking into account RA, and the calculator that might fulfill this role is the new QRISK-2 presented by NICE in 2014. The second concept is to create RA-specific risk calculators, such as the Expanded Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Score for RA. In this review we also discuss the efficiency of a new Pooled Cohort Equation and other calculators in the general and RA population.
炎症性结缔组织病病程中心血管(CV)风险评估的当前方法存在相当大的争议。比较当前类风湿关节炎(RA)指南中不同的CV风险评估方法,只有少数方法推荐使用正式的风险计算器。其中包括欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)指南建议使用SCORE,以及英国风湿病学会与英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)合作制定的指南更倾向于使用QRISK-2。分析最新的美国和英国报告,可以确定两个主要概念。第一个概念是关注为一般人群开发的、考虑到RA的风险计算器,可能符合这一角色的计算器是NICE在2014年推出的新QRISK-2。第二个概念是创建特定于RA的风险计算器,如RA扩展心血管风险预测评分。在本综述中,我们还讨论了新的合并队列方程和其他计算器在一般人群和RA人群中的有效性。