• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术室中的跨专业协作:来自斯里兰卡的一项定性研究。

Interprofessional work in operating rooms: a qualitative study from Sri Lanka.

作者信息

Jayasuriya-Illesinghe Vathsala, Guruge Sepali, Gamage Bawantha, Espin Sherry

机构信息

Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada.

Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2016 Sep 5;16(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0177-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-016-0177-7
PMID:27596281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5011874/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A growing body of research shows links between poor teamwork and preventable surgical errors. Similar work has received little attention in the Global South, and in South Asia, in particular. This paper describes surgeons' perception of teamwork, team members' roles, and the team processes in a teaching hospital in Sri Lanka to highlight the nature of interprofessional teamwork and the factors that influence teamwork in this setting.

METHODS

Data gathered from interviews with 15 surgeons were analyzed using a conceptual framework for interprofessional teamwork.

RESULTS

Interprofessional teamwork was characterized by low levels of interdependency and integration of work. The demarcation of roles and responsibilities for surgeons, nurses, and anesthetists appeared to be a strong element of interprofessional teamwork in this setting. Various relational factors, such as, professional power, hierarchy, and socialization, as well as contextual factors, such as, patriarchy and gender norms influenced interprofessional collaboration, and created barriers to communication between surgeons and nurses. Junior surgeons derived their understanding of appropriate practices mainly from observing senior surgeons, and there was a lack of formal training opportunities and motivation to develop non-technical skills that could improve interprofessional teamwork in operating rooms.

CONCLUSIONS

A more nuanced view of interprofessional teamwork can highlight the different elements of such work suited for each specific setting. Understanding the relational and contextual factors related to and influencing interprofessional socialization and status hierarchies can help improve quality of teamwork, and the training and mentoring of junior members.

摘要

背景

越来越多的研究表明,团队协作不佳与可预防的手术失误之间存在关联。在全球南方地区,尤其是南亚地区,类似的研究很少受到关注。本文描述了斯里兰卡一家教学医院的外科医生对团队协作、团队成员角色以及团队流程的看法,以突出跨专业团队协作的本质以及在此背景下影响团队协作的因素。

方法

使用跨专业团队协作的概念框架,对采访15位外科医生收集的数据进行分析。

结果

跨专业团队协作的特点是工作的相互依存度和整合度较低。在这种背景下,外科医生、护士和麻醉师的角色和职责划分似乎是跨专业团队协作的一个重要因素。各种关系因素,如专业权力、等级制度和社会化,以及背景因素,如父权制和性别规范,影响了跨专业协作,并对外科医生和护士之间的沟通造成了障碍。初级外科医生主要通过观察资深外科医生来理解适当的做法,并且缺乏正式的培训机会以及培养可改善手术室跨专业团队协作的非技术技能的动力。

结论

对跨专业团队协作更细致入微的看法可以突出适合每种特定背景的此类工作的不同要素。了解与跨专业社会化和地位等级制度相关并影响其的关系和背景因素,有助于提高团队协作质量以及对初级成员的培训和指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006a/5011874/4f9368ef238f/12893_2016_177_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006a/5011874/00b76d1a9b66/12893_2016_177_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006a/5011874/4f9368ef238f/12893_2016_177_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006a/5011874/00b76d1a9b66/12893_2016_177_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006a/5011874/4f9368ef238f/12893_2016_177_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Interprofessional work in operating rooms: a qualitative study from Sri Lanka.手术室中的跨专业协作:来自斯里兰卡的一项定性研究。
BMC Surg. 2016 Sep 5;16(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0177-7.
2
Barriers and enablers to effective interprofessional teamwork in the operating room: A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.手术室中有效跨专业团队合作的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0249576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249576. eCollection 2021.
3
Perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in low-acuity settings: a qualitative analysis.低危环境下的跨专业团队合作认知:定性分析。
Med Educ. 2014 Jun;48(6):583-92. doi: 10.1111/medu.12424.
4
Qualitative Analysis of Effective Teamwork in the Operating Room (OR).手术室有效团队合作的定性分析
J Surg Educ. 2021 May-Jun;78(3):967-979. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.09.019. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
The impact of organisational and individual factors on team communication in surgery: a qualitative study.组织因素和个体因素对手术团队沟通的影响:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jun;47(6):732-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
6
Factors Influencing Team Behaviors in Surgery: A Qualitative Study to Inform Teamwork Interventions.影响手术团队行为的因素:一项定性研究以提供团队合作干预措施的信息。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jul;106(1):115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.12.045. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
7
Relationship Between Operating Room Teamwork, Contextual Factors, and Safety Checklist Performance.手术室团队协作、背景因素与安全检查表执行情况之间的关系
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Oct;223(4):568-580.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Operating Room In Situ Interprofessional Simulation for Improving Communication and Teamwork.手术室现场跨专业模拟以改善沟通和团队合作。
J Surg Res. 2021 Apr;260:237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.051. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
9
A mixed-methods study of the causes and impact of poor teamwork between junior doctors and nurses.一项关于初级医生与护士之间团队协作不佳的原因及影响的混合方法研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):339-45. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw036. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
10
The Impact of Operating Room Distractions on Stress, Workload, and Teamwork.手术室干扰对压力、工作负荷和团队合作的影响。
Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1079-84. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001051.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual Mapping of Operating Theater Team Dynamics and Communication for Reflexive Feedback and Surgical Practice Optimization.手术室团队动态与沟通的可视化映射,用于反思性反馈和手术实践优化。
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Jul 17;5(3):e463. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000463. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Advancing leadership in surgery: a realist review of interventions and strategies to promote evidence-based leadership in healthcare.推进外科领导力:促进循证医疗领导力的干预措施和策略的现实主义评价。
Implement Sci. 2023 May 13;18(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01274-3.
3
The "Torment" of Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis among Surgeons.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of non-technical skills in surgery.非技术技能在外科手术中的作用。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015 Oct 9;4(4):422-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.10.006. eCollection 2015 Dec.
2
Reflections: Surgical Education-the Times they are a-Changin': Lessons Learned from the 3rd MAYMET-ESO Joint Meeting.反思:外科教育——时代在变:第三届MAYMET-ESO联合会议的经验教训
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Sep;30(3):411-4. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0831-2.
3
The global burden of unsafe medical care: analytic modelling of observational studies.不安全医疗护理的全球负担:观察性研究的分析模型。
外科医生使用预防性抗生素的“困扰”
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Nov 6;10(11):1357. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111357.
4
The presence and potential impact of psychological safety in the healthcare setting: an evidence synthesis.医疗环境中心理安全感的存在及其潜在影响:证据综合。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 5;21(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06740-6.
5
Italian Validation of the Chiba Interprofessional Competency Scale (CICS29).意大利语版《千葉跨专业能力量表(CICS29)》的验证。
Acta Biomed. 2020 Mar 13;91(2-S):58-66. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i2-S.9172.
6
Influences on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis decision making by surgical craft groups, anaesthetists, pharmacists and nurses in public and private hospitals.公立和私立医院中手术科室、麻醉师、药剂师和护士在外科抗菌预防决策方面的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 14;14(11):e0225011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225011. eCollection 2019.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22(10):809-15. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001748. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
4
Surgical adverse events: a systematic review.手术不良事件:系统评价。
Am J Surg. 2013 Aug;206(2):253-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.11.009. Epub 2013 May 1.
5
What is happening under the surface? Power, conflict and the performance of medical teams.表面之下正在发生什么?权力、冲突与医疗团队的表现。
Med Educ. 2012 Sep;46(9):838-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04322.x.
6
Surgical safety checklists: do they improve outcomes?手术安全核对表:它们能改善结果吗?
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Jul;109(1):47-54. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes175. Epub 2012 May 30.
7
Deconstructing intraoperative communication failures.剖析术中沟通失败。
J Surg Res. 2012 Sep;177(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.04.029. Epub 2012 May 4.
8
Intergroup relationships and quality improvement in healthcare.医患群体关系与医疗质量提升。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i62-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046169.
9
Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes.手术团队行为与患者预后。
Am J Surg. 2009 May;197(5):678-85. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
10
Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder.医生与护士之间的手术室团队协作:旁观者眼中的团队协作。
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 May;202(5):746-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.01.017.