• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坦桑尼亚出生护理的次国家级差异:这能用地点、人口、资金或药物来解释吗?

Subnational variation for care at birth in Tanzania: is this explained by place, people, money or drugs?

作者信息

Armstrong Corinne E, Martínez-Álvarez Melisa, Singh Neha S, John Theopista, Afnan-Holmes Hoviyeh, Grundy Chris, Ruktanochai Corrine W, Borghi Josephine, Magoma Moke, Msemo Georgina, Matthews Zoe, Mtei Gemini, Lawn Joy E

机构信息

Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Evidence for Action, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 12;16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):795. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3404-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-016-3404-3
PMID:27634353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5025821/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tanzania achieved the Millennium Development Goal for child survival, yet made insufficient progress for maternal and neonatal survival and stillbirths, due to low coverage and quality of services for care at birth, with rural women left behind. Our study aimed to evaluate Tanzania's subnational (regional-level) variations for rural care at birth outcomes, i.e., rural women giving birth in a facility and by Caesarean section (C-section), and associations with health systems inputs (financing, health workforce, facilities, and commodities), outputs (readiness and quality of care) and context (education and GDP).

METHODS

We undertook correlation analyses of subnational-level associations between health system inputs, outputs, context, and rural care at birth outcomes; and constructed implementation readiness barometers using benchmarks for each health system input indicator. We used geographical information system (GIS) mapping to visualise subnational variations in care at birth for rural women, with a focus on service availability and readiness, and collected qualitative data to investigate financial flows from national to council level to understand variation in financing inputs.

RESULTS

We found wide subnational variation for rural care at birth outcomes, health systems inputs, and contextual indicators. There was a positive association between rural women giving birth in a facility and by C-section; maternal education; workforce and facility density; and quality of care. There was a negative association between these outcomes and proportion of all births to rural women, total fertility rate, and availability of essential commodities at facilities. Per capita recurrent expenditure was positively associated with facility births (correlation coefficient = 0.43; p = 0.05) but not with C-section. Qualitative results showed that the health financing system is complex and insufficient for providing care at birth services. Bottlenecks for care at birth included low density of health workers, poor availability of essential commodities, and low health financing in Lake and Western Zones.

CONCLUSIONS

No region meets the benchmarks for the four health systems building blocks including health finance, health workforce, health facilities, and commodities. Strategies for addressing health system inequities, including overall increases in health expenditure, are needed in rural populations and areas of highest unmet need for family planning to improve coverage of care at birth for rural women in Tanzania.

摘要

背景

坦桑尼亚实现了儿童生存方面的千年发展目标,但在孕产妇和新生儿生存及死产方面进展不足,原因是出生护理服务的覆盖范围和质量较低,农村妇女被落下。我们的研究旨在评估坦桑尼亚次国家级(区域层面)农村出生护理结果的差异,即农村妇女在医疗机构分娩和剖宫产的情况,以及与卫生系统投入(融资、卫生人力、设施和商品)、产出(准备情况和护理质量)和背景(教育和国内生产总值)之间的关联。

方法

我们对卫生系统投入、产出、背景与农村出生护理结果之间的次国家级关联进行了相关性分析;并使用每个卫生系统投入指标的基准构建了实施准备情况晴雨表。我们使用地理信息系统(GIS)绘图来直观呈现农村妇女出生护理的次国家级差异,重点关注服务的可及性和准备情况,并收集定性数据以调查从国家到地方议会层面的资金流动情况,以了解融资投入的差异。

结果

我们发现农村出生护理结果、卫生系统投入和背景指标在次国家级层面存在很大差异。农村妇女在医疗机构分娩和剖宫产之间存在正相关;孕产妇教育;卫生人力和设施密度;以及护理质量。这些结果与农村妇女分娩总数的比例、总生育率以及医疗机构基本商品的可及性之间存在负相关。人均经常性支出与医疗机构分娩呈正相关(相关系数 = 0.43;p = 0.05),但与剖宫产无关。定性结果表明,卫生融资系统复杂且不足以提供出生护理服务。出生护理的瓶颈包括卫生工作者密度低、基本商品可及性差以及湖泊和西区卫生融资水平低。

结论

没有一个地区达到包括卫生融资、卫生人力、卫生设施和商品在内的四个卫生系统组成部分的基准。需要采取战略来解决卫生系统不平等问题,包括总体增加卫生支出,在农村人口和计划生育需求未得到满足程度最高的地区,以提高坦桑尼亚农村妇女出生护理的覆盖率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/22354fee06a4/12889_2016_3404_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/5259224900c3/12889_2016_3404_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/40ca09bbcbad/12889_2016_3404_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/1abe3ebc1ddd/12889_2016_3404_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/f77135a0fbd9/12889_2016_3404_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/9b8f93887030/12889_2016_3404_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/e79483e9cd7b/12889_2016_3404_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/69279bf4f584/12889_2016_3404_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/6b85d9c6763b/12889_2016_3404_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/54a65b520601/12889_2016_3404_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/b3b3bcd69410/12889_2016_3404_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/22354fee06a4/12889_2016_3404_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/5259224900c3/12889_2016_3404_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/40ca09bbcbad/12889_2016_3404_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/1abe3ebc1ddd/12889_2016_3404_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/f77135a0fbd9/12889_2016_3404_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/9b8f93887030/12889_2016_3404_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/e79483e9cd7b/12889_2016_3404_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/69279bf4f584/12889_2016_3404_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/6b85d9c6763b/12889_2016_3404_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/54a65b520601/12889_2016_3404_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/b3b3bcd69410/12889_2016_3404_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b1/5025821/22354fee06a4/12889_2016_3404_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Subnational variation for care at birth in Tanzania: is this explained by place, people, money or drugs?坦桑尼亚出生护理的次国家级差异:这能用地点、人口、资金或药物来解释吗?
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 12;16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):795. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3404-3.
2
Tanzania's countdown to 2015: an analysis of two decades of progress and gaps for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health, to inform priorities for post-2015.坦桑尼亚迈向 2015 年倒计时:分析过去二十年在生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康方面的进展和差距,为 2015 年后的重点工作提供信息。
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jul;3(7):e396-409. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00059-5.
3
Birth preparedness and complication readiness - a qualitative study among community members in rural Tanzania.分娩准备与并发症应对——坦桑尼亚农村社区成员的定性研究
Glob Health Action. 2015 Jun 12;8:26922. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.26922. eCollection 2015.
4
Readiness of health facilities to provide safe childbirth in Liberia: a cross-sectional analysis of population surveys, facility censuses and facility birth records.利比里亚卫生机构提供安全分娩服务的准备情况:基于人口调查、机构普查和机构分娩记录的横断面分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):952. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05301-x.
5
Is it home delivery or health facility? Community perceptions on place of childbirth in rural Northwest Tanzania using a qualitative approach.是家庭分娩还是医疗机构?坦桑尼亚西北部农村地区以定性方法评估对分娩地点的社区认知。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 6;20(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02967-z.
6
Neonatal indicator data in Tanzania District Health Information System: evaluation of availability and quality of selected newborn indicators, 2015-2022.坦桑尼亚地区卫生信息系统中的新生儿指标数据:2015 - 2022年选定新生儿指标的可得性与质量评估
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jan 23;23(Suppl 2):658. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05417-x.
7
Progress and challenges in maternal health in western China: a Countdown to 2015 national case study.中国西部孕产妇健康进展与挑战:2015 倒计时国家案例研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 May;5(5):e523-e536. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30100-6. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
8
Quality of care during childbirth in Tanzania: identification of areas that need improvement.坦桑尼亚分娩期间的护理质量:确定需要改进的领域。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jan 27;15(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0463-1.
9
Public-sector maternal health programmes and services for rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区的公共部门孕产妇保健计划与服务
J Health Popul Nutr. 2009 Apr;27(2):124-38. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v27i2.3326.
10
Factors associated with health facility childbirth in districts of Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia: a population based survey.肯尼亚、坦桑尼亚和赞比亚各地区与医疗机构分娩相关的因素:一项基于人群的调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jul 4;14:219. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-219.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors determining antenatal care utilization among mothers of deceased perinates in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚围产期死亡儿母亲产前保健利用的决定因素
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 8;10:1203758. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1203758. eCollection 2023.
2
Factors influencing place of delivery in Ethiopia: Linking individual, household, and health facility-level data.影响埃塞俄比亚分娩地点的因素:关联个人、家庭及卫生机构层面的数据。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Sep 1;2(9):e0000535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000535. eCollection 2022.
3
The effect of health insurance and socioeconomic status on women's choice in birth attendant and place of delivery across regions in Indonesia: a multinomial logit analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Countdown to 2015 country case studies: systematic tools to address the "black box" of health systems and policy assessment.《2015年国家案例研究倒计时:应对卫生系统和政策评估“黑匣子”的系统工具》
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 12;16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):790. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3402-5.
2
Enhancing Maternal and Perinatal Health in Under-Served Remote Areas in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Tanzanian Model.加强撒哈拉以南非洲地区服务不足的偏远地区的孕产妇和围产期健康:坦桑尼亚模式。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151419. eCollection 2016.
3
National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis.
医疗保险和社会经济地位对印度尼西亚不同地区妇女选择分娩助手和分娩地点的影响:多项逻辑回归分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007758.
4
Improving health care facility birth rates in Rorya District, Tanzania: a multiple baseline trial.提高坦桑尼亚罗里亚地区医疗保健机构的出生率:一项多基线试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 27;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04408-5.
5
Disparities in use of skilled birth attendants and neonatal mortality rate in Guinea over two decades.二十余年来几内亚熟练接生员使用情况和新生儿死亡率的差异。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04370-8.
6
Sub-regional disparities in the use of antenatal care service in Mauritania: findings from nationally representative demographic and health surveys (2011-2015).毛里塔尼亚地区间产前护理服务利用的差异:全国代表性人口与健康调查(2011-2015 年)的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):1818. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11836-z.
7
Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Services and Its Association with Cervical Cancer Awareness and Knowledge Among Women of Reproductive Age in Dodoma, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study.坦桑尼亚多多马育龄妇女宫颈癌筛查服务的接受情况及其与宫颈癌认知和知识的关联:一项横断面研究
East Afr Health Res J. 2019;3(2):105-114. doi: 10.24248/EAHRJ-D-19-00006. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
8
Inequity in uptake of hospital-based childbirth care in rural Tanzania: analysis of the 2015-16 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey.坦桑尼亚农村地区医院分娩服务利用的不平等:2015-2016 年坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Oct 12;36(9):1428-1440. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab079.
9
Predictors of skilled birth attendance among married women in Cameroon: further analysis of 2018 Cameroon Demographic and Health Survey.喀麦隆已婚妇女获得熟练接生服务的预测因素:对 2018 年喀麦隆人口与健康调查的进一步分析。
Reprod Health. 2021 Mar 25;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01124-9.
10
Magnitude and trends in socio-economic and geographic inequality in access to birth by cesarean section in Tanzania: evidence from five rounds of Tanzania demographic and health surveys (1996-2015).坦桑尼亚剖宫产分娩的社会经济和地理不平等的程度及趋势:来自五轮坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查(1996 - 2015年)的证据
Arch Public Health. 2020 Sep 15;78:80. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00466-3. eCollection 2020.
2015 年全球、区域和国家的死产率估计数及其 2000 年以来的趋势:系统分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Feb;4(2):e98-e108. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
4
Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030.死产:发生率、风险因素及 2030 年目标进展
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):587-603. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00837-5. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
5
Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences.死产:经济和心理社会后果。
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):604-616. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00836-3. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
6
How Can Childbirth Care for the Rural Poor Be Improved? A Contribution from Spatial Modelling in Rural Tanzania.如何改善农村贫困人口的分娩护理?来自坦桑尼亚农村空间建模的贡献。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0139460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139460. eCollection 2015.
7
Quality care during labour and birth: a multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions.分娩期间的优质护理:对卫生系统瓶颈及潜在解决方案的多国分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-15-S2-S2. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
8
Scaling up quality care for mothers and newborns around the time of birth: an overview of methods and analyses of intervention-specific bottlenecks and solutions.扩大出生前后母婴的优质护理:方法概述及特定干预措施的瓶颈与解决方案分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-15-S2-S1. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
9
"Once the government employs you, it forgets you": Health workers' and managers' perspectives on factors influencing working conditions for provision of maternal health care services in a rural district of Tanzania.“一朝政府雇了你,便将你忘脑后”:卫生工作者与管理人员对坦桑尼亚某农村地区影响孕产妇保健服务工作条件因素的看法。
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Sep 14;13:77. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0076-5.
10
Benchmarking health system performance across states in Nigeria: a systematic analysis of levels and trends in key maternal and child health interventions and outcomes, 2000-2013.尼日利亚各州卫生系统绩效基准评估:2000 - 2013年关键母婴健康干预措施及成果的水平与趋势的系统分析
BMC Med. 2015 Sep 2;13:208. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0438-9.