Thomas C L, Kim B, Lam J, Richards S, See A, Kalouche S, Paver R D, Fernández Peñas P
Skin & Cancer Foundation Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Feb;31(2):361-366. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13945. Epub 2016 Sep 18.
Measures of quality of life (QOL) and patient satisfaction are of great importance in dermatology, as both impact upon treatment adherence and health outcomes. Patients' assessment of QOL often differs from their doctors' predictions and their assessments of skin disease severity do not correlate with patients' own perceptions. The development of laser technology has facilitated successful treatment of many skin conditions, but studies on patient satisfaction are lacking.
Our aim was to determine the extent of discordance between patient and dermatologist-assessed disease severity and assess the impact of acne scarring, rosacea and photoaging on QOL. Our secondary aim was to assess patient satisfaction with laser therapy.
A prospective study of patients undergoing laser treatment for acne scarring, rosacea and photoaging was conducted over 1 year at the Skin & Cancer Foundation Australia. Subjective disease severity was determined using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Two dermatologists determined objective severity using validated grading scales to score photographs. QOL impact was measured by Skindex-16, satisfaction was measured using an amended Comprehensive Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18).
A total of 147 individuals sought laser therapy for acne scarring, rosacea and photoaging. Dermatologists' subjective disease severity correlated weakly with patient-reported severity. All conditions negatively impacted upon QOL. Patients with rosacea had the most symptomatic impact; acne scarring was associated with the greatest self-esteem and social functioning issues; photoaging patients were the least affected. There were significant correlations between subjective severity assessment and Skindex-16 scores. There was notable discordance between dermatologist's skin severity assessment and patient's self-reported QOL impact.
Skin conditions can have a profound impact on patient QOL, which is affected by patients' perception of disease severity and not fully appreciated by dermatologists' own severity assessments. Laser therapy is associated with high patient satisfaction.
生活质量(QOL)指标和患者满意度在皮肤科非常重要,因为二者都会影响治疗依从性和健康结局。患者对生活质量的评估往往与医生的预测不同,而且他们对皮肤疾病严重程度的评估与自身感受并不相关。激光技术的发展推动了许多皮肤疾病的成功治疗,但缺乏关于患者满意度的研究。
我们的目的是确定患者与皮肤科医生评估的疾病严重程度之间的不一致程度,并评估痤疮瘢痕、酒渣鼻和光老化对生活质量的影响。我们的次要目的是评估患者对激光治疗的满意度。
在澳大利亚皮肤与癌症基金会对接受痤疮瘢痕、酒渣鼻和光老化激光治疗的患者进行了为期1年的前瞻性研究。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)确定主观疾病严重程度。两名皮肤科医生使用经过验证的分级量表对照片进行评分以确定客观严重程度。使用Skindex-16测量生活质量影响,使用修订后的综合满意度问卷(PSQ-18)测量满意度。
共有147人因痤疮瘢痕、酒渣鼻和光老化寻求激光治疗。皮肤科医生的主观疾病严重程度与患者报告的严重程度之间相关性较弱。所有病症均对生活质量产生负面影响。酒渣鼻患者的症状影响最大;痤疮瘢痕与最大的自尊和社交功能问题相关;光老化患者受影响最小。主观严重程度评估与Skindex-16评分之间存在显著相关性。皮肤科医生的皮肤严重程度评估与患者自我报告的生活质量影响之间存在明显不一致。
皮肤病症可对患者生活质量产生深远影响,这受到患者对疾病严重程度的认知影响,而皮肤科医生自身的严重程度评估并未完全认识到这一点。激光治疗患者满意度较高。