Suppr超能文献

监考人员在类似临床的培训场景中使用三维幽灵工具:一项初步研究。

Proctors exploit three-dimensional ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios: a preliminary study.

作者信息

Jarc Anthony M, Stanley Andrew A, Clifford Thomas, Gill Inderbir S, Hung Andrew J

机构信息

Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA.

Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2017 Jun;35(6):957-965. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1944-x. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In this study, we examine three-dimensional (3D) proctoring tools (i.e., semitransparent ghost tools overlaid on the surgeon's field of view) on realistic surgical tasks. Additionally, we develop novel, quantitative measures of whether proctors exploit the additional capabilities offered by ghost tools.

METHODS

Seven proctor-trainee pairs completed realistic surgical tasks such as tissue dissection and suturing in a live porcine model using 3D ghost tools on the da Vinci Xi Surgical System. The usability and effectiveness of 3D ghost tools were evaluated using objective measures of proctor performance based on proctor hand movements and button presses, as well as post-study questionnaires.

RESULTS

Proctors exploited the capabilities of ghost tools, such as 3D hand movement (p < 0.001), wristedness (p < 0.001), finger pinch gestures (p < 0.001), and bimanual hand motions (p < 0.001). The median ghost tool excursion distances across proctors in the x-, y-, and z-directions were 57.6, 31.9, and 50.7, respectively. Proctors and trainees consistently evaluated the ghost tools as effective across multiple categories of mentoring. Trainees found ghost tools more helpful than proctors across all categories (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Proctors exploit the augmented capabilities of 3D ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios. Additionally, both proctors and trainees evaluated ghost tools as effective mentoring tools, thereby confirming previous studies on simple, inanimate tasks. Based on this preliminary work, advanced mentoring technologies, such as 3D ghost tools, stand to improve current telementoring and training technologies in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们在实际手术任务中检验三维(3D)监考工具(即叠加在外科医生视野上的半透明虚拟工具)。此外,我们开发了新颖的定量方法来衡量监考人员是否利用了虚拟工具提供的额外功能。

方法

七对监考人员与学员在真实的猪模型中使用达芬奇Xi手术系统上的3D虚拟工具完成了诸如组织解剖和缝合等实际手术任务。基于监考人员的手部动作和按钮按压以及研究后的问卷调查,使用监考人员表现的客观指标评估了3D虚拟工具的可用性和有效性。

结果

监考人员利用了虚拟工具的功能,如三维手部动作(p < 0.001)、手腕灵活性(p < 0.001)、手指捏合手势(p < 0.001)和双手协同动作(p < 0.001)。监考人员在x、y和z方向上的虚拟工具移动距离中位数分别为57.6、31.9和50.7。监考人员和学员在多个指导类别中一致认为虚拟工具是有效的。在所有类别中,学员发现虚拟工具比监考人员更有帮助(p < 0.05)。

结论

在类似临床的培训场景中,监考人员利用了3D虚拟工具的增强功能。此外,监考人员和学员都认为虚拟工具是有效的指导工具,从而证实了之前关于简单无生命任务的研究。基于这项初步工作,诸如3D虚拟工具等先进的指导技术有望改进当前机器人辅助微创手术中的远程指导和培训技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55b4/5486541/58904df0f0f5/345_2016_1944_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验