Barrera-Escorcia Guadalupe, Wong-Chang Irma, Fernández-Rendón Carlos Leopoldo, Botello Alfonso Vázquez, Gómez-Gil Bruno, Lizárraga-Partida Marcial Leonardo
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - Iztapalapa, México City, México.
Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México.
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Nov;188(11):602. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5620-9. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
Oysters can accumulate potentially pathogenic water bacteria. The objective of this study was to compare two procedures to quantify Vibrio species present in oysters to determine the most sensitive method. We analyzed oyster samples from the Gulf of Mexico, commercialized in Mexico City. The samples were inoculated in tubes with alkaline peptone water (APW), based on three tubes and four dilutions (10 to 10). From these tubes, the first quantification of Vibrio species was performed (most probable number (MPN) from tubes) and bacteria were inoculated by streaking on thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (TCBS) petri dishes. Colonies were isolated for a second quantification (MPN from dishes). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to determine species with specific primers: ompW for Vibrio cholerae, tlh for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and VvhA for Vibrio vulnificus. Simultaneously, the sanitary quality of oysters was determined. The quantification of V. parahaemolyticus was significantly higher in APW tubes than in TCBS dishes. Regarding V. vulnificus counts, the differences among both approaches were not significant. In contrast, the MPNs of V. cholerae obtained from dishes were higher than from tubes. The quantification of MPNs through PCR of V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus obtained from APW was sensitive and recommendable for the detection of both species. In contrast, to quantify V. cholerae, it was necessary to isolate colonies on TCBS prior PCR. Culturing in APW at 42 °C could be an alternative to avoid colony isolation. The MPNs of V. cholerae from dishes was associated with the bad sanitary quality of the samples.
牡蛎能够蓄积具有潜在致病性的水生细菌。本研究的目的是比较两种用于定量牡蛎中弧菌属细菌的方法,以确定最灵敏的方法。我们分析了来自墨西哥湾、在墨西哥城商业化销售的牡蛎样本。将样本接种于装有碱性蛋白胨水(APW)的试管中,基于3支试管和4种稀释度(10至10)。从这些试管中,对弧菌属细菌进行首次定量(试管中的最可能数(MPN)),并通过划线接种于硫代硫酸盐-柠檬酸盐-胆盐-蔗糖(TCBS)培养皿上。分离菌落进行第二次定量(培养皿中的MPN)。使用聚合酶链反应(PCR)通过特异性引物来确定菌种:用于霍乱弧菌的ompW、用于副溶血性弧菌的tlh以及用于创伤弧菌的VvhA。同时,测定牡蛎的卫生质量。副溶血性弧菌在APW试管中的定量显著高于在TCBS培养皿中的定量。关于创伤弧菌的计数,两种方法之间的差异不显著。相比之下,从培养皿中获得的霍乱弧菌的MPN高于从试管中获得的。通过PCR对从APW中获得的副溶血性弧菌和创伤弧菌进行MPN定量,对于检测这两种菌种灵敏且值得推荐。相比之下,要对霍乱弧菌进行定量,在PCR之前有必要在TCBS上分离菌落。在42℃的APW中培养可能是避免菌落分离的一种替代方法。培养皿中霍乱弧菌的MPN与样本的不良卫生质量相关。