Suppr超能文献

促进健康的干预措施对谁有效?独立进行日常生活活动的预测因素。

For whom is a health-promoting intervention effective? Predictive factors for performing activities of daily living independently.

作者信息

Dahlin-Ivanoff Synneve, Eklund Kajsa, Wilhelmson Katarina, Behm Lina, Häggblom-Kronlöf Greta, Zidén Lena, Landahl Sten, Gustafsson Susanne

机构信息

Department of Health and Rehabilitation, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Box 455, SE 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg Centre for Ageing and Health (AgeCap), SE 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0345-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health-promoting interventions tailored to support older persons to remain in their homes, so-called "ageing in place" is important for supporting or improving their health. The health-promoting programme "Elderly Persons in the Risk Zone," (EPRZ) was set up for this purpose and has shown positive results for maintaining independence in activities of daily living for older persons 80 years and above at 1- and 2 year follow-ups. The aim of this study was to explore factors for maintaining independence in the EPRZ health-promoting programme.

METHODS

Total of 459 participants in the original trial was included in the analysis; 345 in the programme arm and 114 in the control arm. Thirteen variables, including demographic, health, and programme-specific indicators, were chosen as predictors for independence of activities of daily living. Logistic regression was performed separately for participants in the health promotion programme and in the control arm.

RESULTS

In the programme arm, being younger, living alone and self-rated lack of tiredness in performing mobility activities predicted a positive effect of independence in activities of daily living at 1-year follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 1.73, 3.02) and 2-year, (OR 1.13, 2.01, 2.02). In the control arm, being less frail was the only predictor at 1-year follow up (OR 1.6 1.09, 2.4); no variables predicted the outcome at the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Older persons living alone - as a risk of ill health - should be especially recognized and offered an opportunity to participate in health-promoting programmes such as "Elderly Persons in the Risk Zone". Further, screening for subjective frailty could form an advantageous guiding principle to target the right population when deciding to whom health-promoting intervention should be offered.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The original clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00877058 , April 6, 2009.

摘要

背景

量身定制的促进健康干预措施,旨在支持老年人居家养老,即所谓的“就地养老”,对于维持或改善他们的健康状况至关重要。为此设立了促进健康项目“处于风险区域的老年人”(EPRZ),并在1年和2年的随访中显示出对80岁及以上老年人在日常生活活动中保持独立的积极效果。本研究的目的是探索EPRZ促进健康项目中维持独立性的因素。

方法

原试验中的459名参与者纳入分析;345名在项目组,114名在对照组。选择13个变量,包括人口统计学、健康状况和特定项目指标,作为日常生活活动独立性的预测因素。对健康促进项目组和对照组的参与者分别进行逻辑回归分析。

结果

在项目组中,年龄较轻、独自生活以及自评在进行移动活动时不疲劳,预测在1年随访时(优势比[OR] 1.18、1.73、3.02)和2年随访时(OR 1.13、2.01、2.02)对日常生活活动独立性有积极影响。在对照组中,身体不太虚弱是1年随访时唯一的预测因素(OR 1.6、1.09、2.4);在2年随访时没有变量预测结果。

结论

独自生活的老年人——作为健康不佳的风险人群——应得到特别关注,并提供机会参与“处于风险区域的老年人”等促进健康项目。此外,在决定对哪些人提供促进健康干预措施时,筛查主观虚弱程度可形成一个有利的指导原则,以确定合适的人群。

试验注册

原临床试验在ClinicalTrials.gov注册。标识符:NCT00877058,2009年4月6日。

相似文献

3
Long-term outcome for ADL following the health-promoting RCT--elderly persons in the risk zone.
Gerontologist. 2013 Aug;53(4):654-63. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns121. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
5
Health Promotion Can Postpone Frailty: Results from the RCT Elderly Persons in the Risk Zone.
Public Health Nurs. 2016 Jul;33(4):303-15. doi: 10.1111/phn.12240. Epub 2015 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

2
Assessment of the Daily Living Activities of Older People (2004-2023): A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 11;12(12):1180. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12121180.
3
Impaired Activity of Daily Living Status of the Older Adults and Its Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;19(23):15607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315607.
5
Effective Interventions on Improving Elderly's Independence in Activity of Daily Living: A Systematic Review and Logic Model.
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 15;8:516151. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.516151. eCollection 2020.
7
Modelling long-term cost-effectiveness of health promotion for community-dwelling older people.
Eur J Ageing. 2019 Feb 23;16(4):395-404. doi: 10.1007/s10433-019-00505-1. eCollection 2019 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventive home visits for mortality, morbidity, and institutionalization in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 12;9(3):e89257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089257. eCollection 2014.
4
Frailty consensus: a call to action.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022.
5
Preventive home visits and health--experiences among very old people.
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 23;13:378. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-378.
6
Relationship of sedentary behavior and physical activity to incident cardiovascular disease: results from the Women's Health Initiative.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 11;61(23):2346-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.031. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
7
Do older adults aged 60-75 years benefit from diabetes behavioral interventions?
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jun;36(6):1501-6. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2110. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
8
Long-term outcome for ADL following the health-promoting RCT--elderly persons in the risk zone.
Gerontologist. 2013 Aug;53(4):654-63. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns121. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
9
Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Aug;60(8):1487-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04054.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
10
Multi-professional and multi-dimensional group education--a key to action in elderly persons.
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Mar;35(5):427-35. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.697249. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验