• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蛋白质组学揭示植物叶片中的干旱响应机制

Drought-Responsive Mechanisms in Plant Leaves Revealed by Proteomics.

作者信息

Wang Xiaoli, Cai Xiaofeng, Xu Chenxi, Wang Quanhua, Dai Shaojun

机构信息

Development Centre of Plant Germplasm Resources, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Oct 18;17(10):1706. doi: 10.3390/ijms17101706.

DOI:10.3390/ijms17101706
PMID:27763546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5085738/
Abstract

Plant drought tolerance is a complex trait that requires a global view to understand its underlying mechanism. The proteomic aspects of plant drought response have been extensively investigated in model plants, crops and wood plants. In this review, we summarize recent proteomic studies on drought response in leaves to reveal the common and specialized drought-responsive mechanisms in different plants. Although drought-responsive proteins exhibit various patterns depending on plant species, genotypes and stress intensity, proteomic analyses show that dominant changes occurred in sensing and signal transduction, reactive oxygen species scavenging, osmotic regulation, gene expression, protein synthesis/turnover, cell structure modulation, as well as carbohydrate and energy metabolism. In combination with physiological and molecular results, proteomic studies in leaves have helped to discover some potential proteins and/or metabolic pathways for drought tolerance. These findings provide new clues for understanding the molecular basis of plant drought tolerance.

摘要

植物耐旱性是一个复杂的性状,需要从全局角度来理解其潜在机制。在模式植物、农作物和木本植物中,已经对植物干旱响应的蛋白质组学方面进行了广泛研究。在本综述中,我们总结了近期关于叶片干旱响应的蛋白质组学研究,以揭示不同植物中常见和特殊的干旱响应机制。尽管干旱响应蛋白根据植物物种、基因型和胁迫强度呈现出各种模式,但蛋白质组学分析表明,主要变化发生在感知和信号转导、活性氧清除、渗透调节、基因表达、蛋白质合成/周转、细胞结构调节以及碳水化合物和能量代谢等方面。结合生理和分子研究结果,叶片的蛋白质组学研究有助于发现一些潜在的耐旱蛋白质和/或代谢途径。这些发现为理解植物耐旱性的分子基础提供了新线索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b0/5085738/7d8505c0c136/ijms-17-01706-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b0/5085738/b8f0ea1d8651/ijms-17-01706-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b0/5085738/e62f72dd69b2/ijms-17-01706-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b0/5085738/3e06d9ea494a/ijms-17-01706-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b0/5085738/e912a985adbe/ijms-17-01706-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b0/5085738/7d8505c0c136/ijms-17-01706-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b0/5085738/b8f0ea1d8651/ijms-17-01706-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b0/5085738/e62f72dd69b2/ijms-17-01706-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b0/5085738/3e06d9ea494a/ijms-17-01706-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b0/5085738/e912a985adbe/ijms-17-01706-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b0/5085738/7d8505c0c136/ijms-17-01706-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Drought-Responsive Mechanisms in Plant Leaves Revealed by Proteomics.蛋白质组学揭示植物叶片中的干旱响应机制
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Oct 18;17(10):1706. doi: 10.3390/ijms17101706.
2
Proteomics and phosphoproteomics reveal the different drought-responsive mechanisms of priming with (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate in two tea cultivars.蛋白质组学和磷酸化蛋白质组学揭示了(Z)-3-己烯基乙酸酯引发两种茶树品种抗旱响应机制的不同。
J Proteomics. 2023 Oct 30;289:105010. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2023.105010. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
3
Physiological and proteomic responses of two contrasting Populus cathayana populations to drought stress.两个对比鲜明的青杨种群对干旱胁迫的生理和蛋白质组学响应
Physiol Plant. 2009 Jun;136(2):150-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01222.x. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
4
Comparative Proteomic and Morpho-Physiological Analyses of Maize Wild-Type Vp16 and Mutant vp16 Germinating Seed Responses to PEG-Induced Drought Stress.玉米野生型 vp16 和 vp16 突变体萌发种子对 PEG 诱导干旱胁迫响应的比较蛋白质组学和形态生理分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov 8;20(22):5586. doi: 10.3390/ijms20225586.
5
iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis reveals proteomic changes in leaves of cultivated tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) in response to drought stress.基于iTRAQ的定量蛋白质组学分析揭示了栽培烟草(烟草)叶片在干旱胁迫下的蛋白质组变化。
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016 Jan 15;469(3):768-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.133. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
6
Physiological and proteomic analysis on long-term drought resistance of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).木薯(Manihot esculenta Crantz)长期抗旱的生理和蛋白质组学分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 19;8(1):17982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35711-x.
7
Comparative proteomic analysis of drought tolerance in the two contrasting Tibetan wild genotypes and cultivated genotype.两种对比鲜明的西藏野生基因型和栽培基因型耐旱性的比较蛋白质组学分析
BMC Genomics. 2015 Jun 5;16(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1657-3.
8
Molecular mechanism of mulberry response to drought stress revealed by complementary transcriptomic and iTRAQ analyses.通过转录组和iTRAQ联合分析揭示桑树对干旱胁迫响应的分子机制
BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Jan 17;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03410-x.
9
Drought-responsive mechanisms in rice genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance during reproductive stage.在生殖阶段具有不同耐旱性的水稻基因型中对干旱的响应机制。
J Plant Physiol. 2012 Mar 1;169(4):336-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
10
Physiological and Differential Proteomic Analyses of Imitation Drought Stress Response in Root at the Seedling Stage.幼苗期根模仿干旱胁迫响应的生理和差异蛋白质组学分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Dec 1;21(23):9174. doi: 10.3390/ijms21239174.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on Key Genes for Flowering of Under Introduced Cultivation Conditions.引种栽培条件下花卉开花关键基因的研究
Genes (Basel). 2025 Jul 11;16(7):811. doi: 10.3390/genes16070811.
2
Quantitative proteomic analysis based on TMT reveals different responses of Haloxylon ammodendron and Haloxylon persicum to long-term drought.基于TMT的定量蛋白质组学分析揭示了梭梭和白梭梭对长期干旱的不同响应。
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06513-x.
3
Comparative phenotypic, physiological, and transcriptomic responses to drought and recovery in two Fraxinus species.

本文引用的文献

1
An Ethylene-responsive Factor BpERF11 Negatively Modulates Salt and Osmotic Tolerance in Betula platyphylla.一个乙烯响应因子BpERF11负向调控白桦的耐盐性和耐渗透性。
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 16;6:23085. doi: 10.1038/srep23085.
2
Class-Specific Evolution and Transcriptional Differentiation of 14-3-3 Family Members in Mesohexaploid Brassica rapa.中六倍体白菜14-3-3家族成员的类特异性进化与转录分化
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jan 26;7:12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00012. eCollection 2016.
3
ROS Regulation During Abiotic Stress Responses in Crop Plants.
两种白蜡树属植物对干旱及恢复的比较表型、生理和转录组反应
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06372-6.
4
Genetic associations determine the effects of intergenerational and transgenerational stress memory for salinity exposure histories in barley.遗传关联决定了大麦对盐分暴露历史的代际和跨代应激记忆的影响。
Plant Cell Rep. 2025 Jan 9;44(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s00299-024-03404-7.
5
Exploration of key genes and pathways in response to submergence stress in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) by WGCNA.通过加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)探索红三叶草(Trifolium pratense L.)对淹水胁迫响应中的关键基因和通路。
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05804-z.
6
Effects of exogenous calcium on flavonoid biosynthesis and accumulation in peanut roots under salt stress through multi-omics.外源钙通过多组学对盐胁迫下花生根中黄酮生物合成和积累的影响
Front Nutr. 2024 Oct 30;11:1434170. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1434170. eCollection 2024.
7
Biochemical and Proteomic Analyses in Drought-Tolerant Wheat Mutants Obtained by Gamma Irradiation.通过伽马辐射获得的耐旱小麦突变体的生化和蛋白质组学分析
Plants (Basel). 2024 Sep 27;13(19):2702. doi: 10.3390/plants13192702.
8
Integrated Review of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Studies to Understand Molecular Mechanisms of Rice's Response to Environmental Stresses.转录组学和蛋白质组学研究的综合综述,以了解水稻对环境胁迫响应的分子机制
Biology (Basel). 2024 Aug 25;13(9):659. doi: 10.3390/biology13090659.
9
Multi-omics analyses reveal the responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and rhizosphere bacterial community to nano(micro)plastics stress.多组学分析揭示了小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)及其根际细菌群落对纳米(微)塑料胁迫的响应。
J Nanobiotechnology. 2024 Aug 23;22(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02777-x.
10
Molecular mechanisms regulating glucose metabolism in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seeds under drought stress.调控干旱胁迫下藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)种子中葡萄糖代谢的分子机制。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Aug 23;24(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05510-w.
作物植物非生物胁迫响应过程中的ROS调节
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Dec 8;6:1092. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01092. eCollection 2015.
4
Overexpression of MuHSP70 gene from Macrotyloma uniflorum confers multiple abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana.来自单花豆的MuHSP70基因过表达赋予转基因拟南芥多重非生物胁迫耐受性。
Mol Biol Rep. 2016 Feb;43(2):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s11033-015-3938-y. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
5
Abiotic Stresses Downregulate Key Genes Involved in Nitrogen Uptake and Assimilation in Brassica juncea L.非生物胁迫下调芥菜中参与氮吸收和同化的关键基因
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 25;10(11):e0143645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143645. eCollection 2015.
6
Glutathione Peroxidase of Pennisetum glaucum (PgGPx) Is a Functional Cd2+ Dependent Peroxiredoxin that Enhances Tolerance against Salinity and Drought Stress.黍(PgGPx)的谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶是一种功能性的依赖Cd2+的过氧化物还原酶,可增强对盐胁迫和干旱胁迫的耐受性。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0143344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143344. eCollection 2015.
7
Identification of 14-3-3 Family in Common Bean and Their Response to Abiotic Stress.普通菜豆中14-3-3家族的鉴定及其对非生物胁迫的响应。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0143280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143280. eCollection 2015.
8
Overexpression of a tomato flavanone 3-hydroxylase-like protein gene improves chilling tolerance in tobacco.番茄黄烷酮 3-羟化酶样蛋白基因的过表达提高了烟草的耐冷性。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015 Nov;96:388-400. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
9
Transgenic Arabidopsis Plants Expressing Tomato Glutathione S-Transferase Showed Enhanced Resistance to Salt and Drought Stress.表达番茄谷胱甘肽S-转移酶的转基因拟南芥植株对盐胁迫和干旱胁迫表现出增强的抗性。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 1;10(9):e0136960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136960. eCollection 2015.
10
Network Candidate Genes in Breeding for Drought Tolerant Crops.耐旱作物育种中的网络候选基因。
Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Jul 17;16(7):16378-400. doi: 10.3390/ijms160716378.