Suppr超能文献

反射式共聚焦显微镜用于敏感性皮肤的评估。

Reflectance confocal microscopy for the evaluation of sensitive skin.

作者信息

Ma Y-F, Yuan C, Jiang W-C, Wang X-L, Humbert P

机构信息

Department of Skin and Cosmetic Research, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Department of Phototherapy, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Skin Res Technol. 2017 May;23(2):227-234. doi: 10.1111/srt.12327. Epub 2016 Oct 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, the diagnosis for sensitive skin relies on subjective assessment or on the combination of subjective and objective evaluation. No quantitative evaluation is available. It could be expected that confocal microscopy imaging could be of interest to better define the condition.

METHODS

Total 166 healthy female subjects were recruited in this study. Firstly, all subjects completed the sensitive questionnaire. Then, the cutaneous structures were measured by the reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) on the face and fossa cubitalia. The lactic acid sting test was conducted finally. According to the results of self-perception sensitive skin questionnaire and lactic acid stinging test to evaluate facial skin sensitivity the both positive subjects were regarded as sensitive skin group and both negative group as healthy control group.

RESULT

The results of RCM indicating that the proportion of 'disarranged honeycomb pattern' and 'spongiform edema' in the sensitive group and healthy control group were statistically different (P < 0.05), respectively; The following report 'damaged dermal papilla rings' was not a distinctive pattern, with no significant statistical difference (P > 0.05). The epidermal thickness was 38.88 ± 6.81 μm, healthy control group was 40.31 ± 9.37 μm in, respectively, sensitive skin group and healthy control group, there was no significant statistical difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The honeycomb structure depth of sensitive group was 20.57 ± 4.86 μm. It was for 23.27 ± 6.38 μm, healthy control group the difference being statistically different between the two groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on the RCM results, 'epidermal honeycomb structure' and 'spongiform edema' may be used as new skin signs of RCM evaluation of sensitive skin effectively. Indeed, sensitive skin honeycomb structure depth was thinner compared with healthy control group. Such a specific pattern has good clinical and monitoring value for the further exploration. RCM could provide new data and patterns for the evaluation of sensitive skin.

摘要

背景

如今,敏感性皮肤的诊断依赖于主观评估或主观与客观评估相结合的方式。尚无定量评估方法。可以预期,共聚焦显微镜成像可能有助于更好地界定这种情况。

方法

本研究共招募了166名健康女性受试者。首先,所有受试者完成敏感性调查问卷。然后,通过反射式共聚焦显微镜(RCM)对面部和肘窝的皮肤结构进行测量。最后进行乳酸刺痛试验。根据自我感知敏感性皮肤问卷和乳酸刺痛试验的结果评估面部皮肤敏感性,两项结果均为阳性的受试者被视为敏感性皮肤组,两项结果均为阴性的受试者被视为健康对照组。

结果

RCM结果表明,敏感性皮肤组和健康对照组中“蜂窝状排列紊乱模式”和“海绵状水肿”的比例分别具有统计学差异(P < 0.05);以下报告的“真皮乳头环受损”并非独特模式,无显著统计学差异(P > 0.05)。敏感性皮肤组的表皮厚度为38.88 ± 6.81μm,健康对照组为40.31 ± 9.37μm,两组之间无显著统计学差异(P > 0.05)。敏感性皮肤组的蜂窝状结构深度为20.57 ± 4.86μm,健康对照组为23.27 ± 6.38μm,两组之间差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。

结论

基于RCM结果,“表皮蜂窝状结构”和“海绵状水肿”可有效用作RCM评估敏感性皮肤的新皮肤体征。实际上,与健康对照组相比,敏感性皮肤的蜂窝状结构深度更薄。这种特定模式对于进一步探索具有良好的临床和监测价值。RCM可为敏感性皮肤的评估提供新的数据和模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验