Suffoletto Brian, Chung Tammy
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Nov;77(6):914-923. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.914.
We sought to identify patterns of response (latent classes) to a text-message (short message service) intervention based on weekend drinking cognitions (e.g., drinking plans, commitment to a low consumption goal), and to examine how the latent classes differed in baseline characteristics and alcohol consumption outcomes.
We conducted a secondary analysis of 384 non-treatment seeking young adults with hazardous alcohol use randomly assigned to a 12-week short message service intervention. Responses to weekly short message service queries related to weekend drinking cognitions were categorized as (a) planned not to drink, (b) planned to drink but did not plan a heavy drinking episode (HDE), (c) planned to have an HDE but willing to limit alcohol consumption, (d) planned to have an HDE and not willing to limit alcohol consumption We used repeated-measures latent class analysis to identify distinct classes based on these categories and examined associations of the classes with baseline covariates and alcohol consumption outcomes through 6 months.
We identified the following three latent classes: planned not to drink (62%), willing to limit drinks (27%), and not willing to limit drinks (12%). The "not willing to limit drinks" class exhibited the least reductions in alcohol consumption and was more likely to include White individuals and those with higher baseline drinking severity. The "planned not to drink" class had the greatest reductions in alcohol consumption.
Young adults who exhibited low likelihood of committing to goals to limit weekend drinking were less responsive to short message service intervention, suggesting the need for alternative interventions.
我们试图确定基于周末饮酒认知(如饮酒计划、对低消费目标的承诺)对短信(短消息服务)干预的反应模式(潜在类别),并研究潜在类别在基线特征和酒精消费结果方面的差异。
我们对384名有危险饮酒行为且未寻求治疗的年轻人进行了二次分析,这些人被随机分配到为期12周的短消息服务干预中。对与周末饮酒认知相关的每周短消息服务查询的回复被分类为:(a) 计划不饮酒,(b) 计划饮酒但未计划重度饮酒事件(HDE),(c) 计划发生HDE但愿意限制酒精消费,(d) 计划发生HDE且不愿意限制酒精消费。我们使用重复测量潜在类别分析根据这些类别确定不同的类别,并通过6个月研究这些类别与基线协变量和酒精消费结果的关联。
我们确定了以下三个潜在类别:计划不饮酒(62%)、愿意限制饮酒(27%)和不愿意限制饮酒(12%)。“不愿意限制饮酒”类别在酒精消费减少方面表现最差,并且更有可能包括白人个体和基线饮酒严重程度较高的个体。“计划不饮酒”类别在酒精消费方面减少最多。
对限制周末饮酒目标承诺可能性较低的年轻人对短消息服务干预的反应较小,这表明需要其他干预措施。