Freunberger Dominik, Roehm Dietmar
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg , Salzburg , Austria.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Oct 20;31(9):1193-1205. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1205202. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
Do people predict specific word-forms during language comprehension? In an Event-Related Potential (ERP) study participants read German sentences with predictable () and unpredictable () verbs. Verbs were either consistent with the expected word-form (/) or inconsistent and therefore led to ungrammaticality (/). ERPs within the N400 time-window were modulated by predictability but not by the surface-form of the verbs, suggesting that no exact word-forms were predicted. Based on our results we will argue that predictions included semantic rather than form-information. Furthermore, ungrammatical verbs led to a strong P600, probably due to task-saliency whereas correct unpredictable verbs elicited an anterior post-N400 positivity. Because the contexts were moderately constraining, this might reflect discourse revision processes rather than inhibition of a predicted word.
人们在语言理解过程中会预测特定的词形吗?在一项事件相关电位(ERP)研究中,参与者阅读带有可预测( )和不可预测( )动词的德语句子。动词要么与预期的词形一致(/),要么不一致,因此导致不符合语法规则(/)。N400时间窗口内的ERP受到可预测性的调节,但不受动词表面形式的调节,这表明没有预测到确切的词形。基于我们的研究结果,我们认为预测包含的是语义信息而非形式信息。此外,不符合语法规则的动词会引发强烈的P600,这可能是由于任务显著性,而正确的不可预测动词会引发N400后的前部正波。由于语境具有适度的约束性,这可能反映的是语篇修正过程,而非对预测词的抑制。