Liu Peng Ju, Ma Fang, Lou Hui Ping, Zhu Yan Ning
1Departments of Clinical Nutrition,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,China Academic Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,People's Republic of China.
2Medical Examination Center,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,China Academic Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing,People's Republic of China.
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Apr;20(6):984-991. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003281. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) has been reported to be more strongly associated with cardiometabolic risk factors among non-obese individuals than BMI and waist circumference (WC). A body shape index (ABSI) and body roundness index (BRI) have been proposed recently to assess obesity-related disorders or mortalities. Our aim was to compare the ability of ABSI and BRI with that of WHtR to identify cardiometabolic risk factors in Chinese adults with normal BMI and WC.
Receiver-operating characteristic curves and areas under the curve (AUC) were employed to evaluate the ability of the indices (WHtR, BRI, ABSI) to identify metabolic risk factors and to determine the indices' optimal cut-off values. The value of each index that resulted in maximization of the Youden index (sensitivity + specificity - 1) was defined as optimal. Differences in the AUC values between the indices were also evaluated.
Individuals attending a voluntary health check-up in Beijing, China, July-December 2015, were recruited to the study.
Non-obese adults (n 1596).
Among both genders, ABSI exhibited the lowest AUC value for identifying each risk factor among the three indices; the AUC value of BRI for identifying each risk factor was very close to that of WHtR, and no significant differences were observed between the AUC values of the two new indices.
When evaluating cardiometabolic risk factors among non-obese adults, WHtR was a simple and effective index in the assessment of cardiometabolic risk factors, BRI could be used as an alternative body index to WHtR, while ABSI could not.
据报道,在非肥胖个体中,腰高比(WHtR)与心脏代谢危险因素的关联比体重指数(BMI)和腰围(WC)更强。最近有人提出了体型指数(ABSI)和体圆度指数(BRI)来评估肥胖相关疾病或死亡率。我们的目的是比较ABSI和BRI与WHtR识别正常BMI和WC的中国成年人心脏代谢危险因素的能力。
采用受试者工作特征曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)来评估各指数(WHtR、BRI、ABSI)识别代谢危险因素的能力,并确定各指数的最佳截断值。将导致约登指数(灵敏度+特异度-1)最大化的每个指数的值定义为最佳值。还评估了各指数之间AUC值的差异。
2015年7月至12月在中国北京参加自愿健康检查的个体被纳入研究。
非肥胖成年人(n = 1596)。
在男女两性中,ABSI在三个指数中识别各危险因素的AUC值最低;BRI识别各危险因素的AUC值与WHtR非常接近,两个新指数的AUC值之间未观察到显著差异。
在评估非肥胖成年人的心脏代谢危险因素时,WHtR是评估心脏代谢危险因素的一个简单有效的指标,BRI可作为WHtR的替代身体指数,而ABSI则不能。