• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单亲遗传促进细胞质基因组的适应性进化。

Uniparental Inheritance Promotes Adaptive Evolution in Cytoplasmic Genomes.

作者信息

Christie Joshua R, Beekman Madeleine

机构信息

School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Mar 1;34(3):677-691. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw266.

DOI:10.1093/molbev/msw266
PMID:28025277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5896580/
Abstract

Eukaryotes carry numerous asexual cytoplasmic genomes (mitochondria and plastids). Lacking recombination, asexual genomes should theoretically suffer from impaired adaptive evolution. Yet, empirical evidence indicates that cytoplasmic genomes experience higher levels of adaptive evolution than predicted by theory. In this study, we use a computational model to show that the unique biology of cytoplasmic genomes-specifically their organization into host cells and their uniparental (maternal) inheritance-enable them to undergo effective adaptive evolution. Uniparental inheritance of cytoplasmic genomes decreases competition between different beneficial substitutions (clonal interference), promoting the accumulation of beneficial substitutions. Uniparental inheritance also facilitates selection against deleterious cytoplasmic substitutions, slowing Muller's ratchet. In addition, uniparental inheritance generally reduces genetic hitchhiking of deleterious substitutions during selective sweeps. Overall, uniparental inheritance promotes adaptive evolution by increasing the level of beneficial substitutions relative to deleterious substitutions. When we assume that cytoplasmic genome inheritance is biparental, decreasing the number of genomes transmitted during gametogenesis (bottleneck) aids adaptive evolution. Nevertheless, adaptive evolution is always more efficient when inheritance is uniparental. Our findings explain empirical observations that cytoplasmic genomes-despite their asexual mode of reproduction-can readily undergo adaptive evolution.

摘要

真核生物携带众多无性细胞质基因组(线粒体和质体)。由于缺乏重组,无性基因组理论上应会遭受适应性进化受损的问题。然而,实证证据表明,细胞质基因组经历的适应性进化水平高于理论预测。在本研究中,我们使用一个计算模型来表明,细胞质基因组独特的生物学特性——特别是它们在宿主细胞中的组织方式以及单亲(母系)遗传——使它们能够进行有效的适应性进化。细胞质基因组的单亲遗传减少了不同有益替代之间的竞争(克隆干扰),促进了有益替代的积累。单亲遗传还有助于对有害细胞质替代进行选择,减缓了穆勒棘轮效应。此外,单亲遗传通常会减少选择性清除过程中有害替代的遗传搭便车现象。总体而言,单亲遗传通过增加有益替代相对于有害替代的水平来促进适应性进化。当我们假设细胞质基因组遗传是双亲遗传时,减少配子发生过程中传递的基因组数量(瓶颈效应)有助于适应性进化。然而,当遗传是单亲遗传时,适应性进化总是更有效率。我们的研究结果解释了实证观察结果,即细胞质基因组尽管其无性繁殖方式,但仍能轻易地进行适应性进化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/48f5fc537b56/msw266f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/233161351ca3/msw266f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/afcd3890afd2/msw266f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/458bdca29cfb/msw266f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/243c9e28f1d7/msw266f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/5951178aeb46/msw266f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/a9b370d7f797/msw266f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/c18e82fc2484/msw266f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/48f5fc537b56/msw266f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/233161351ca3/msw266f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/afcd3890afd2/msw266f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/458bdca29cfb/msw266f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/243c9e28f1d7/msw266f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/5951178aeb46/msw266f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/a9b370d7f797/msw266f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/c18e82fc2484/msw266f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b82/5896580/48f5fc537b56/msw266f8.jpg

相似文献

1
Uniparental Inheritance Promotes Adaptive Evolution in Cytoplasmic Genomes.单亲遗传促进细胞质基因组的适应性进化。
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Mar 1;34(3):677-691. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw266.
2
Selective sweeps of mitochondrial DNA can drive the evolution of uniparental inheritance.线粒体DNA的选择性清除可推动单亲遗传的进化。
Evolution. 2017 Aug;71(8):2090-2099. doi: 10.1111/evo.13291. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
3
Evolutionary origin and consequences of uniparental mitochondrial inheritance.单亲线粒体遗传的进化起源及后果
Hum Reprod. 2000 Jul;15 Suppl 2:102-11. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.suppl_2.102.
4
Selection against heteroplasmy explains the evolution of uniparental inheritance of mitochondria.对异质性的选择解释了线粒体单亲遗传的进化。
PLoS Genet. 2015 Apr 16;11(4):e1005112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005112. eCollection 2015 Apr.
5
Germline bottlenecks and the evolutionary maintenance of mitochondrial genomes.种系瓶颈与线粒体基因组的进化维持
Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):2135-46. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.2135.
6
Evolutionary defined role of the mitochondrial DNA in fertility, disease and ageing.线粒体 DNA 在生育、疾病和衰老中的进化定义作用。
Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):671-89. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv024. Epub 2015 May 14.
7
Mitigating Mitochondrial Genome Erosion Without Recombination.在不进行重组的情况下减轻线粒体基因组侵蚀。
Genetics. 2017 Nov;207(3):1079-1088. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300273. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
8
Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution.线粒体和叶绿体基因的单亲遗传:机制与进化
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 5;92(25):11331-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11331.
9
The evolutionary processes of mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes differ from those of nuclear genomes.线粒体和叶绿体基因组的进化过程不同于核基因组的进化过程。
Naturwissenschaften. 2004 Nov;91(11):505-18. doi: 10.1007/s00114-004-0571-3. Epub 2004 Sep 28.
10
The unusual system of doubly uniparental inheritance of mtDNA: isn't one enough?线粒体DNA的双重单亲遗传这一独特系统:一个还不够吗?
Trends Genet. 2007 Sep;23(9):465-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.05.011. Epub 2007 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The rps15-rpl32 intergenic locus is a phylogeographic marker for Latin American Zea mays landrace varieties and subspecies.rps15-rpl32基因间区域是拉丁美洲玉米地方品种和亚种的系统地理学标记。
BMC Genomics. 2025 Jul 17;26(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11831-3.
2
Paternal leakage of plastids rescues inter-lineage hybrids in Silene nutans.父本质体漏出拯救了杂种矢车菊的种间杂种。
Ann Bot. 2024 Apr 10;133(3):427-434. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad196.
3
Complete Chloroplast Genomes and Comparative Analyses of Three (Aeridinae, Orchidaceae) Species.

本文引用的文献

1
Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations in Endosymbionts: Muller's Ratchet with Two Levels of Selection.内共生体中有害突变的积累:具有两个选择层次的穆勒棘轮效应
Am Nat. 2000 Oct;156(4):425-441. doi: 10.1086/303396.
2
Homeostatic Responses Regulate Selfish Mitochondrial Genome Dynamics in C. elegans.稳态反应调节秀丽隐杆线虫中自私线粒体基因组的动态变化。
Cell Metab. 2016 Jul 12;24(1):91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.06.008.
3
Selfish drive can trump function when animal mitochondrial genomes compete.当动物线粒体基因组相互竞争时,自私驱动力可能胜过功能。
完整的叶绿体基因组和三种(兰科, Aeridinae)物种的比较分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jul 6;24(13):11167. doi: 10.3390/ijms241311167.
4
Mutation pressure, drift, and the pace of molecular coevolution.突变压力、漂移和分子协同进化的速度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jul 4;120(27):e2306741120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2306741120. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
5
Uniparental Inheritance and Recombination as Strategies to Avoid Competition and Combat Muller's Ratchet among Mitochondria in Natural Populations of the Fungus .单亲遗传与重组作为真菌自然种群中线粒体避免竞争和对抗缪勒氏棘轮效应的策略
J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Apr 15;9(4):476. doi: 10.3390/jof9040476.
6
Mitochondrial effects on fertility and longevity in contradict predictions of the mother's curse hypothesis.线粒体对生育力和寿命的影响与母亲诅咒假说的预测相矛盾。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Nov 30;289(1987):20221211. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1211. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
7
Genomic Signatures of Mitonuclear Coevolution in Mammals.哺乳动物中线粒体与核基因组协同进化的基因组特征。
Mol Biol Evol. 2022 Nov 3;39(11). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac233.
8
Sorting of mitochondrial and plastid heteroplasmy in is extremely rapid and depends on MSH1 activity.线粒体和质体异质体在中的分拣非常迅速,依赖于 MSH1 活性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 23;119(34):e2206973119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206973119. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
9
Selection for biparental inheritance of mitochondria under hybridization and mitonuclear fitness interactions.杂交和线粒体-核适应相互作用下选择线粒体的双亲遗传。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Dec 8;288(1964):20211600. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1600.
10
Mitonuclear Coevolution, but not Nuclear Compensation, Drives Evolution of OXPHOS Complexes in Bivalves.线粒体与核基因协同进化而非核基因补偿驱动双壳类动物氧化磷酸化复合物的进化。
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 May 19;38(6):2597-2614. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab054.
Nat Genet. 2016 Jul;48(7):798-802. doi: 10.1038/ng.3587. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
4
Intracellular evolution of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and the tragedy of the cytoplasmic commons.线粒体DNA(mtDNA)的细胞内进化与细胞质公地悲剧
Bioessays. 2016 Jun;38(6):549-55. doi: 10.1002/bies.201600003. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
5
Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of molecular evolution.性别通过改变分子进化的动态过程来加速适应性。
Nature. 2016 Mar 10;531(7593):233-6. doi: 10.1038/nature17143. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
6
The rate of adaptive evolution in animal mitochondria.动物线粒体中的适应性进化速率。
Mol Ecol. 2016 Jan;25(1):67-78. doi: 10.1111/mec.13475. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
7
Similar Efficacies of Selection Shape Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes in Both Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens.选择在黑腹果蝇和人类中对线粒体基因和核基因产生的相似影响
G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Aug 21;5(10):2165-76. doi: 10.1534/g3.114.016493.
8
Estimating the Fitness Effects of New Mutations in the Wild Yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus.估算野生酵母奇异酵母中新突变的适应性效应。
Genome Biol Evol. 2015 Jun 16;7(7):1887-95. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv112.
9
Selection against heteroplasmy explains the evolution of uniparental inheritance of mitochondria.对异质性的选择解释了线粒体单亲遗传的进化。
PLoS Genet. 2015 Apr 16;11(4):e1005112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005112. eCollection 2015 Apr.
10
Mitochondrial DNA copy number is regulated by DNA methylation and demethylation of POLGA in stem and cancer cells and their differentiated progeny.线粒体DNA拷贝数在干细胞、癌细胞及其分化后代中由POLGA的DNA甲基化和去甲基化调控。
Cell Death Dis. 2015 Feb 26;6(2):e1664. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.34.