Suppr超能文献

The diagnosis of reflux oesophagitis: an evaluation of five investigative procedures.

作者信息

Breen K J, Whelan G

出版信息

Aust N Z J Surg. 1978 Apr;48(2):156-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1978.tb07294.x.

Abstract

Five methods of diagnosis have been compared prospectively in 43 patients referred for suspected reflux oesophagitis. A final diagnosis of reflux oesophagitis, as defined by the presence of at least two of the three features of typical symptoms, abnormal endoscopic findings, and abnormal findings on oesophageal biopsy, was made in 27 patients. Observer error in the interpretation of endoscopic and histological appearances was small. Measurement of resting pressure of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) failed to identify individual patients with reflux oesophagitis, although the mean pressure in 26 patients with oesophagitis (10.1 +/- 5.2 mm Hg) was significantly lower that in 13 patients without oesophagitis (16.8 +/- 10.2 mm Hg, P less than 0.005). Barium studies were unhelpful, as a hiatus hernia was present in only 14 and barium reflux in only 11 of the 27 patients with oesophagitis. Acid perfusion (Bernstein test) was positive at 15 minutes in 23 of the 27 oesophagitis patients, but was falsely positive in seven of the 14 patients without oesophagitis. By accepting only those responses to acid perfusion which were positive at or before seven minutes, the false positive responses were reduced to one out of the 14 patients. Typical symptoms and/or an early positive Bernstein response will correctly identify most patients with reflux oesophagitis, but the diagnosis should be confirmed by endoscopy and biopsy when important therapeutic decisions are pending.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验