• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者价值观和偏好意味着什么?基于对定性论文系统评价的分类法。

What do patient values and preferences mean? A taxonomy based on a systematic review of qualitative papers.

作者信息

Bastemeijer Carla M, Voogt Lennard, van Ewijk Johannes P, Hazelzet Jan A

机构信息

Department of Normative Professionalization, University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Physical Therapy Studies, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):871-881. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.019. Epub 2016 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.019
PMID:28043713
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In order to deliver good healthcare quality, it should explicitly be taken into account what patients value in healthcare. This study reviews qualitative studies in which patients express what they value. Based on this body of literature a preliminary taxonomy is designed.

METHODS

A systematic review of qualitative papers on what patients' value.

RESULTS

22 studies out of a total of 3259 met the inclusion criteria. After critical appraisal, data extraction was carried out by two researchers independently and revealed values related to 1) the individual patient; 2) the expected behavior of professionals and 3) the interaction between patients and professionals. Seven key elements were recognized on the bases of content analysis; 1) uniqueness, 2) autonomy, 3) compassion, 4) professionalism, 5) responsiveness, 6) partnership and 7) empowerment.

CONCLUSION

This study gives a rich insight into what patients value in various contexts and provides a promising taxonomy in line with patient centered based theories. The taxonomy needs further empirical research for a deeper insight and clarifaction in its elements.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This review and preliminary taxonomy contribute to the conceptualization of patient values as a bases for guidelines, policy and daily practice.

摘要

目的

为了提供优质的医疗服务,应明确考虑患者在医疗保健中所重视的内容。本研究回顾了患者表达其所重视内容的定性研究。基于这一文献体系设计了一个初步的分类法。

方法

对关于患者重视内容的定性论文进行系统综述。

结果

在总共3259项研究中,有22项符合纳入标准。经过严格评估后,由两名研究人员独立进行数据提取,结果显示这些价值与以下三个方面相关:1)个体患者;2)专业人员的预期行为;3)患者与专业人员之间的互动。基于内容分析确定了七个关键要素:1)独特性;2)自主性;3)同情心;4)专业性;5)响应性;6)伙伴关系;7)赋权。

结论

本研究深入洞察了患者在不同情境下所重视的内容,并提供了一个符合以患者为中心理论的、有前景的分类法。该分类法需要进一步的实证研究,以便更深入地洞察和厘清其要素。

实践意义

本综述和初步分类法有助于将患者价值观概念化,作为制定指南、政策和日常实践的基础。

相似文献

1
What do patient values and preferences mean? A taxonomy based on a systematic review of qualitative papers.患者价值观和偏好意味着什么?基于对定性论文系统评价的分类法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):871-881. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.019. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
2
Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验中参与者和专业人员偏好影响的概念框架与系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9350.
3
Patient experiences of partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance: a systematic review.患者与医护人员合作以确保手部卫生合规的经历:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Jun;15(6):1645-1670. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003001.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
6
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
7
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.
10
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
What do patients and informal caregivers value in IBD care? A narrative inquiry.患者及非正式照护者在炎症性肠病护理中看重什么?一项叙事探究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 10;25(1):681. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12823-5.
2
Experiences of COVID-19 Patients With Person-Centred Care During Cohort Isolation: A Mixed-Method Study.队列隔离期间以患者为中心的护理下COVID-19患者的经历:一项混合方法研究。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 3;17(2):e78470. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78470. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Perceived Connections Between Personal Values and Health in High-Risk Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.
患有多种疾病的高危患者对个人价值观与健康之间关联的认知:一项定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09448-z.
4
Patient preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review update to inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.患者对乳腺癌筛查的偏好:为加拿大预防保健工作组的建议提供信息的系统评价更新。
Syst Rev. 2024 May 28;13(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02539-8.
5
Explorative observational study of Dutch patient-clinician interactions: operationalisation of personal perspective elicitation as part of shared decision-making in real-life audio-recorded consultations.荷兰医患互动探索性观察研究:在真实的录音咨询中作为共同决策的一部分,对个人观点启发的操作化。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 16;14(5):e079540. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079540.
6
Introducing extended consultations for patients with severe mental illness in general practice: Results from the SOFIA feasibility study.在全科医学中为严重精神疾病患者提供扩展咨询:SOFIA 可行性研究结果。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Oct 5;24(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02152-z.
7
A Qualitative Study of the Values, Needs, and Preferences of Patients Regarding Stroke Care: The ValueCare Study.一项关于中风护理中患者价值观、需求和偏好的定性研究:价值关怀研究
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Jul 17;23(3):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6997. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
8
Hospital healthcare experiences of children and young people with life-threatening or life-shortening conditions, and their parents: scoping reviews and resultant conceptual frameworks.危及生命或生命有限的儿童和青少年及其父母的医院医疗保健体验:范围综述及由此产生的概念框架。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Jul 17;23(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04151-6.
9
Picturing aesthetic futures: values and visual tools within shared decision-making.描绘美学未来:共享决策中的价值观与视觉工具
Integr Healthc J. 2022 Sep 12;4(1):e000126. doi: 10.1136/ihj-2022-000126. eCollection 2022.
10
It is time for a new comprehensive medication review quality measure.是时候制定新的全面药物治疗审查质量衡量标准了。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Jun;29(6):680-684. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.6.680.