Malta Deborah Carvalho, Stopa Sheila Rizzato, Silva Marta Maria Alves da, Szwarcwald Célia Landmann, Franco Marco da Silveira, Santos Flavia Vinhaes, Machado Elaine Leandro, Gómez Carlos Minayo
Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Av. Alfredo Balena 190, Santa Efigênia. 30130-100 Belo Horizonte MG Brasil.
Departamento de Epidemiologia. Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo SP Brasil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2017 Jan;22(1):169-178. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017221.17862015.
: to provide an overview of occupational accidents among Brazil's adult population.
: descriptive study using data from the 2013 National Health Survey.
: A total of 4.9 million workers mentioned having suffered some kind of work-related accident, which is equivalent to 3.4% (CI95% 4.6-5.6) of Brazil's adult population. Prevalence rates were higher among men, young adults aged between 18 and 39 years, and black people and in the North Region of the country. Prevalence was highest in the State of Para and lowest in the State of Rio de Janeiro State. Around one third of all accidents were commuting accidents, 50.4% (CI95% 45.3-55.5) of people who had suffered an occupational accident were prevented from carrying out some kind of routine activity due to the accident, 8.8% (CI95% 6.4-11.2) were hospitalized and 19% (CI95% 15.3-22.7) had sequelae resulting from occupational accidents.
: the data provided by the National Health Survey comprises an unprecedented and invaluable source of information on these issues in Brazil. The results of the survey confirm that occupational accidents are underreported, since official figures do not cover individuals working in the informal sector.
概述巴西成年人口中的职业事故情况。
采用2013年全国健康调查的数据进行描述性研究。
共有490万工人提到曾遭遇某种与工作相关的事故,这相当于巴西成年人口的3.4%(95%置信区间为4.6 - 5.6)。男性、18至39岁的年轻人、黑人和该国北部地区的事故发生率较高。帕拉州的发生率最高,里约热内卢州的发生率最低。所有事故中约三分之一是通勤事故,50.4%(95%置信区间为45.3 - 55.5)遭受职业事故的人因事故而无法进行某种日常活动,8.8%(95%置信区间为6.4 - 11.2)住院治疗,19%(95%置信区间为15.3 - 22.7)有职业事故导致的后遗症。
全国健康调查提供的数据是巴西这些问题方面前所未有的宝贵信息来源。调查结果证实职业事故报告不足,因为官方数据未涵盖非正规部门的工作人员。