Deniston O L, Carpentier-Alting P, Kneisley J, Hawthorne V M, Port F K
Department of Public Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.
Health Serv Res. 1989 Oct;24(4):555-78.
Ten different multi-item indexes and nine single-item measures were used to assess the quality of life of patients undergoing one of four major modalities of treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Assessments were made on a population-based sample of Michigan patients with onset of ESRD after November 1, 1981, during the period May 1984 to September 1986. The nature of these measures is described and correlations among them are reported. The correlations suggest that these indexes tend to represent either function or feeling, with moderate relationships within the two clusters but little between them. Findings are also reported in terms of age, race, and sex. Depending on the measure chosen to assess quality of life, different conclusions about the relationship of quality of life to these demographic characteristics will be reached. These conclusions may help readers think more critically about the nature of quality of life in arriving at judgments on the relative validity of these different measures.
十种不同的多项目指标和九种单项目测量方法被用于评估接受终末期肾病(ESRD)四种主要治疗方式之一的患者的生活质量。评估对象是密歇根州1981年11月1日之后发病的ESRD患者的基于人群的样本,时间为1984年5月至1986年9月。文中描述了这些测量方法的性质并报告了它们之间的相关性。这些相关性表明,这些指标往往要么代表功能,要么代表感受,在两个类别内部存在适度的关系,但两者之间关系不大。研究结果还按年龄、种族和性别进行了报告。根据选择用来评估生活质量的测量方法,会得出关于生活质量与这些人口统计学特征之间关系的不同结论。这些结论可能有助于读者在判断这些不同测量方法的相对有效性时,更批判性地思考生活质量的本质。