Suppr超能文献

海滩伞与高防晒因子防晒霜的防晒效果比较:一项随机临床试验。

Sun Protection by Beach Umbrella vs Sunscreen With a High Sun Protection Factor: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc, Skillman, New Jersey.

Thomas J. Stephens & Associates, Richardson, Texas.

出版信息

JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Mar 1;153(3):304-308. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4922.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Sun-protective behavior affects skin cancer prevention. Shade works by physically shielding skin from direct harmful UV rays; however, skin may still remain exposed to reflected and indirect UV rays. There is no current standard metric to evaluate shade for its effectiveness in sun protection, and there is insufficient clinical evidence that a beach umbrella alone can provide adequate sun protection.

OBJECTIVE

To directly measure sunburn protection offered by a standard beach umbrella compared with that provided by sunscreen with a high sun protection factor under actual use conditions.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-center, evaluator-blinded, randomized clinical study was conducted from August 13 to 15, 2014, in Lake Lewisville, Texas (elevation, 159 m above sea level), among 81 participants with Fitzpatrick skin types I (n = 1), II (n = 42), and III (n = 38). Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups: 1 using only a beach umbrella, and the other using only sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 100. All participants remained at a sunny beach for 3½ hours at midday. Clinical sunburn evaluation of each individual for all exposed body sites was conducted 22 to 24 hours after sun exposure.

INTERVENTIONS

The shade provided by a beach umbrella or protection provided by sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 100.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Sunburn on all exposed body sites 22 to 24 hours after sun exposure.

RESULTS

Among the 81 participants (25 male and 56 female; mean [SD] age, 41 [16] years) for all body sites evaluated (face, back of neck, upper chest, arms, and legs), the umbrella group showed a statistically significant increase in clinical sunburn scores compared with baseline and had higher postexposure global scores than the sunscreen group (0.75 vs 0.05; P < .001). There was a total of 142 sunburn incidences in the umbrella group vs 17 in the sunscreen group. Thirty-two of the 41 participants (78%) in the umbrella group showed erythema in 1 or more sites vs 10 of the 40 participants (25%) in the sunscreen group (P < .001). Neither umbrella nor sunscreen alone completely prevented sunburn.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

A beach umbrella alone may not provide sufficient protection for extended UV exposure. It is important to educate the public that combining multiple sun protection measures may be needed to achieve optimal protection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN19177299.

摘要

重要性

防晒行为影响皮肤癌的预防。遮阳伞通过物理遮挡皮肤免受有害的紫外线直射,从而起到防晒作用;然而,皮肤仍然可能会暴露在反射和散射紫外线中。目前还没有评估遮阳伞防晒效果的标准指标,也没有足够的临床证据表明单独使用遮阳伞就能提供足够的防晒效果。

目的

在实际使用条件下,直接比较标准遮阳伞和高防晒系数防晒霜提供的晒伤防护效果。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项 2014 年 8 月 13 日至 15 日在德克萨斯州刘易斯湖进行的单中心、评估者设盲、随机临床试验,共有 81 名参与者,Fitzpatrick 皮肤类型为 I 型(n=1)、II 型(n=42)和 III 型(n=38)。参与者被随机分为两组:一组仅使用遮阳伞,另一组仅使用防晒系数为 100 的防晒霜。所有参与者在中午时分都在阳光明媚的海滩上待了 3 个半小时。在日晒后 22 至 24 小时,对所有暴露的身体部位进行临床晒伤评估。

干预措施

遮阳伞提供的遮阳效果或防晒系数为 100 的防晒霜提供的防晒效果。

主要结果和措施

日晒后 22 至 24 小时所有暴露的身体部位(面部、颈后、上胸部、手臂和腿部)的晒伤情况。

结果

在所有身体部位(面部、颈后、上胸部、手臂和腿部)评估的 81 名参与者中(男性 25 名,女性 56 名;平均[标准差]年龄为 41[16]岁),与基线相比,遮阳伞组的临床晒伤评分有统计学意义的增加,并且暴露后全球评分高于防晒霜组(0.75 比 0.05;P<0.001)。遮阳伞组共有 142 例晒伤病例,防晒霜组有 17 例。在遮阳伞组的 41 名参与者中,有 32 名(78%)在 1 个或多个部位出现红斑,而在防晒霜组的 40 名参与者中,有 10 名(25%)出现红斑(P<0.001)。遮阳伞和防晒霜都不能完全预防晒伤。

结论和相关性

单独使用遮阳伞可能无法提供足够的紫外线暴露防护。教育公众需要结合多种防晒措施以达到最佳的保护效果非常重要。

试验注册

isrctn.org 标识符:ISRCTN67703002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验