• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者情感舒适度体验评估(PEECE):开发与测试一种测量工具。

Patient Evaluation of Emotional Comfort Experienced (PEECE): developing and testing a measurement instrument.

作者信息

Williams A M, Lester L, Bulsara C, Petterson A, Bennett K, Allen E, Joske D

机构信息

School of Health Professions, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.

Centre for Nursing Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 25;7(1):e012999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012999.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012999
PMID:28122833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5278251/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Patient Evaluation of Emotional Comfort Experienced (PEECE) is a 12-item questionnaire which measures the mental well-being state of emotional comfort in patients. The instrument was developed using previous qualitative work and published literature.

DESIGN

Instrument development.

SETTING

Acute Care Public Hospital, Western Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Sample of 374 patients.

INTERVENTIONS

A multidisciplinary expert panel assessed the face and content validity of the instrument and following a pilot study, the psychometric properties of the instrument were explored.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis assessed the underlying dimensions of the PEECE instrument; Cronbach's α was used to determine the reliability; κ was used for test-retest reliability of the ordinal items.

RESULTS

2 factors were identified in the instrument and named 'positive emotions' and 'perceived meaning'. A greater proportion of male patients were found to report positive emotions compared with female patients. The instrument was found to be feasible, reliable and valid for use with inpatients and outpatients.

CONCLUSIONS

PEECE was found to be a feasible instrument for use with inpatient and outpatients, being easily understood and completed. Further psychometric testing is recommended.

摘要

目的

患者情感舒适体验评估(PEECE)是一份包含12个条目的问卷,用于测量患者情感舒适方面的心理健康状况。该工具是基于之前的定性研究和已发表文献开发的。

设计

工具开发。

地点

西澳大利亚州的急性护理公立医院。

参与者

374名患者的样本。

干预措施

一个多学科专家小组评估了该工具的表面效度和内容效度,在一项预试验研究之后,探究了该工具的心理测量特性。

主要结局指标

探索性和验证性因素分析评估了PEECE工具的潜在维度;使用克朗巴哈α系数来确定信度;κ系数用于有序条目的重测信度。

结果

该工具中识别出2个因素,分别命名为“积极情绪”和“感知意义”。发现报告积极情绪的男性患者比例高于女性患者。该工具被发现对于住院患者和门诊患者而言是可行、可靠且有效的。

结论

发现PEECE是一种适用于住院患者和门诊患者的可行工具,易于理解和填写。建议进一步进行心理测量测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67f7/5278251/3ff037470950/bmjopen2016012999f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67f7/5278251/3ff037470950/bmjopen2016012999f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67f7/5278251/3ff037470950/bmjopen2016012999f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient Evaluation of Emotional Comfort Experienced (PEECE): developing and testing a measurement instrument.患者情感舒适度体验评估(PEECE):开发与测试一种测量工具。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 25;7(1):e012999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012999.
2
Emotional care experienced by hospitalised patients: development and testing of a measurement instrument.住院患者所体验到的情感关怀:一种测量工具的开发与测试
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Apr;18(7):1069-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02586.x. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
3
Development and validation of the Chinese surgical inpatient satisfaction and comfort questionnaire.中文外科住院患者满意度和舒适度问卷的编制和验证。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 30;100(52):e28363. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028363.
4
Further psychometric testing of an instrument to measure emotional care in hospital.进一步测试一种用于测量医院情感关怀的工具的心理计量学特性。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Dec;20(23-24):3472-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03846.x.
5
Validation of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tools (RMIC-MTs) in renal care for patient and care providers.验证彩虹综合关怀测量工具(RMIC-MTs)在肾脏关怀中对患者和护理提供者的适用性。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 19;14(9):e0222593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222593. eCollection 2019.
6
Perceived professional preparedness of senior nursing students' questionnaire: Development and psychometric evaluation.护理专业高年级学生感知专业准备情况问卷:编制与心理测量学评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Oct;93:104533. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104533. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
7
Development of a quality of life questionnaire for nursing home residents in mainland China.开发中国大陆养老院居民生活质量问卷。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2289-2297. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02180-2. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
8
Patient experiences questionnaire for interdisciplinary treatment for substance dependence (PEQ-ITSD): reliability and validity following a national survey in Norway.物质依赖跨学科治疗患者体验问卷(PEQ - ITSD):挪威全国调查后的信效度研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1242-1.
9
Mental health recovery for psychiatric inpatient services: perceived importance of the elements of recovery.精神科住院服务中的心理健康康复:康复要素的感知重要性
East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;22(2):39-48.
10
Development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) questionnaire among student Tuberculosis (TB) Patients (STBP-KAPQ) in China.中国学生结核病患者(STBP)知识、态度和实践(KAP)问卷的编制及心理测量学检验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 May 8;18(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3122-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Hospice Comfort Questionnaire-Patient (HCQ-P).《临终关怀舒适问卷-患者版(HCQ-P)》中文版的改编与验证
PeerJ. 2025 Jun 10;13:e19562. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19562. eCollection 2025.
2
An eHealth intervention for patients with a low socioeconomic position during their waiting period preceding cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized feasibility study.一项针对社会经济地位较低的患者在心脏康复前等待期的电子健康干预措施:一项随机可行性研究。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Nov 14;6(1):115-125. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae084. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Development and validation of a patient experience assessment questionnaire for evaluating hospital care in Iran.

本文引用的文献

1
Of passions and positive spontaneous thoughts.关于激情与积极的自发想法。
Cognit Ther Res. 2017 Jun;41(3):350-361. doi: 10.1007/s10608-016-9755-3. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
2
Psychosocial Adaptation to Chronic Illness and Disability: A Virtue Based Model.慢性病与残疾的心理社会适应:一种基于美德的模型。
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Mar;26(1):45-55. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9622-1.
3
A systematic review of reliable and valid tools for the measurement of patient participation in healthcare.患者参与医疗保健的可靠和有效工具的系统评价。
用于评估伊朗医院护理的患者体验评估问卷的开发与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 13;25(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12208-8.
4
Role of Emotional Support and Socio-Cultural Atmosphere on the Experience Caesaran Patients: A Systematic Review.情感支持和社会文化氛围对剖宫产患者体验的作用:一项系统综述
Iran J Public Health. 2024 Dec;53(12):2632-2645.
5
Efficacy and safety of a non-immersive virtual reality-based neuropsychological intervention for cognitive stimulation and relaxation in patients with critical illness: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial (RGS-ICU).一种基于非沉浸式虚拟现实的神经心理干预对危重症患者认知刺激和放松的疗效及安全性:一项随机临床试验(RGS-ICU)的研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):917. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06360-4.
6
Considering User Experience and Behavioral Approaches in the Design of mHealth Interventions for Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review.考虑用户体验和行为方法在房颤 mHealth 干预设计中的应用:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 4;26:e54405. doi: 10.2196/54405.
7
Support network: the challenges of ensuring myocardial infarction patients comfort in the critical care unit: a qualitative study.支持网络:确保重症监护病房心肌梗死患者舒适的挑战:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 12;24(1):1057. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11450-w.
8
Hospital healthcare experiences of children and young people with life-threatening or life-shortening conditions, and their parents: scoping reviews and resultant conceptual frameworks.危及生命或生命有限的儿童和青少年及其父母的医院医疗保健体验:范围综述及由此产生的概念框架。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Jul 17;23(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04151-6.
9
Nurses' healing presence: A panacea for the comfort of acute coronary syndrome patients in CCU, A qualitative study.护士的治愈力:CCU 中急性冠脉综合征患者舒适的万能药,一项定性研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jun;10(6):3744-3753. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1631. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
10
The Impact of Chronic Illness on the Patient Experience: Results From a Cross-Sectional Comparative Study in a Comprehensive Tertiary Hospital in China.慢性病对患者体验的影响:来自中国一家综合性三级医院的横断面对比研究结果。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221090382. doi: 10.1177/00469580221090382.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Feb;25(2):110-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004357. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
Validity of a New Patient Engagement Measure: The Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure.一种新型患者参与度测量方法的效度:阿尔塔鲁姆消费者参与度(ACE)测量法。
Patient. 2015 Dec;8(6):559-68. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0131-2.
5
Measuring patient engagement: development and psychometric properties of the Patient Health Engagement (PHE) Scale.衡量患者参与度:患者健康参与度(PHE)量表的开发及心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 27;6:274. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00274. eCollection 2015.
6
The meaning of compassion.
Br J Nurs. 2015;24(6):342-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.6.342.
7
Hospital nurses' lived experience of power.医院护士对权力的亲身经历。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 May;47(3):267-74. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12127. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
What really matters? A multi-view perspective of one patient's hospital experience.真正重要的是什么?从多视角看一位患者的住院经历。
Contemp Nurse. 2014;49:122-36. doi: 10.5172/conu.2014.49.122.
9
An oasis in the hospital: the perceived benefits of a cancer support center in a hospital setting offering complementary therapies.医院中的一片绿洲:医院环境中提供辅助疗法的癌症支持中心的感知益处。
J Holist Nurs. 2014 Dec;32(4):250-60. doi: 10.1177/0898010114526951. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
10
Patient perspectives on quality.
Qual Prim Care. 2014;22(1):11-5.