Roseboom Kitty J, van Dongen Johanna M, Tompa Emile, van Tulder Maurits W, Bosmans Judith E
Department of Health Sciences and the EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Avenue Suite 800, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-1986-9.
The use of economic evaluations in healthcare decision-making can potentially help decision-makers in allocating scarce resources as efficiently as possible. Over a decade ago, the use of such studies was found to be limited in Dutch healthcare decision-making, but their current use is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to provide insight into the current and potential use of economic evaluations in Dutch healthcare decision-making and to identify barriers and facilitators to the use of such studies.
Interviews containing semi-structured and structured questions were conducted among Dutch healthcare decision-makers. Participants were purposefully selected and special efforts were made to include decision-makers working at the macro- (national), meso- (local/regional), and micro-level (patient setting). During the interviews, a topic list was used that was based on the research questions and a literature search, and was developed in consultation with the Dutch National Healthcare Institute. Responses to the semi-structured questions were analyzed using a constant comparative approach. As for the structured questions, participants' definitions of various economic evaluation concepts were scored as either being "correct" or "incorrect" by two researchers, and summary statistics were prepared.
Sixteen healthcare decision-makers were interviewed and two health economists. Decision-makers' knowledge of economic evaluations was only modest, and their current use appeared to be limited. Nonetheless, decision-makers recognized the importance of economic evaluations and saw several opportunities for extending their use at the macro- and meso-level, but not at the micro-level. The disparity between the limited use and recognition of the importance of economic evaluations is likely due to the many barriers decision-makers experience preventing their use (e.g. lack of resources, lack of formal willingness-to-pay threshold). Possible facilitators for extending the use of economic evaluations include, amongst others, educating decision-makers and the general population about economic evaluations and presenting economic evaluation results in a clearer and more understandable way.
This study demonstrated that the current use and impact of economic evaluations in Dutch healthcare decision-making is limited at best. Therefore, strategies are needed to overcome the barriers that currently prevent economic evaluations from being used extensively.
在医疗保健决策中使用经济评估可能有助于决策者尽可能高效地分配稀缺资源。十多年前,此类研究在荷兰医疗保健决策中的应用被发现有限,但目前的使用情况尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在深入了解经济评估在荷兰医疗保健决策中的当前和潜在用途,并确定使用此类研究的障碍和促进因素。
对荷兰医疗保健决策者进行了包含半结构化和结构化问题的访谈。参与者是经过有目的的挑选,并且特别努力纳入了在宏观(国家)、中观(地方/区域)和微观层面(患者环境)工作的决策者。在访谈过程中,使用了一份基于研究问题和文献检索的主题清单,该清单是在与荷兰国家医疗保健研究所协商后制定的。使用持续比较法分析对半结构化问题的回答。对于结构化问题,由两名研究人员将参与者对各种经济评估概念的定义评定为“正确”或“错误”,并编制汇总统计数据。
采访了16名医疗保健决策者和两名卫生经济学家。决策者对经济评估的了解程度仅为一般,其目前的使用似乎有限。尽管如此,决策者认识到经济评估的重要性,并看到了在宏观和中观层面扩大其使用的几个机会,但在微观层面没有。经济评估使用有限与对其重要性的认识之间的差距可能是由于决策者遇到的许多阻碍其使用的障碍(例如缺乏资源、缺乏正式的支付意愿阈值)。扩大经济评估使用的可能促进因素包括,除其他外,对决策者和普通民众进行经济评估教育,以及以更清晰、更易懂的方式呈现经济评估结果。
本研究表明,经济评估在荷兰医疗保健决策中的当前使用和影响充其量是有限的。因此,需要采取策略来克服目前阻碍经济评估广泛使用的障碍。