Gamberale F, Olson B A, Eneroth P, Lindh T, Wennberg A
National Institute of Occupational Health, Solna, Sweden.
Br J Ind Med. 1989 Oct;46(10):729-37. doi: 10.1136/oem.46.10.729.
The aim of the study was to investigate the possible acute effects of exposure to electric and magnetic fields. Twenty six experienced linesmen, aged 25 to 52, were studied during two working days while performing a simulated routine inspection of insulators on steel poles of a 400 kV power line. During one of the working days the inspection was performed on a power line in operation and on the other day the same procedure was performed on an identical power line, which was not in operation. The two days were found to be comparable with regard to the physical workload which, on the basis of heart rate measurements, was estimated to be high. Exposure to the electric and magnetic fields was measured using a device designed for on-worker sampling on each linesman. The mean exposure for the working day was estimated to be 2.8 kV/m (SD = 0.35) and 23.3 microT (SD = 4.2). The possible effects of exposure were studied using a battery of four automated performance tests, EEG, a mood scale, and a questionnaire to assess subjective symptoms. All workers were examined immediately before and after each workday. Furthermore, blood samples were collected for each subject on three different occasions during each workday. The battery of behavioural tests comprised a test of simple reaction time, a vigilance test, a test of short term memory (digit span), and a perceptual test (symbol digit). The four EEG recordings for each worker were judged blindly and sorted with regard to amount and stability of alpha activity. The blood samples were used for an analysis of possible changes during the workday with regard to the following hormones: thyroid stimulated hormone, luteinising hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, prolactin, cortisol, testosterone, and neopterin. Detailed analyses of the results using both parametric and nonparametric tests showed no statistically significant difference between the two conditions which could be attributed to exposure to electric and magnetic fields.
该研究的目的是调查暴露于电场和磁场可能产生的急性影响。对26名年龄在25至52岁之间的经验丰富的线路工人进行了研究,研究时间为两个工作日,期间他们在一条400 kV输电线的钢杆上对绝缘子进行模拟例行检查。在其中一个工作日,检查在一条运行中的输电线上进行,而在另一天,在一条相同的停运输电线上进行相同的操作。结果发现,这两天在体力工作量方面具有可比性,根据心率测量,估计体力工作量较高。使用专为每个线路工人进行现场采样设计的设备测量电场和磁场暴露情况。工作日的平均暴露估计为2.8 kV/m(标准差 = 0.35)和23.3微特斯拉(标准差 = 4.2)。使用一组四项自动化性能测试、脑电图、情绪量表和一份评估主观症状的问卷来研究暴露可能产生的影响。在每个工作日前后立即对所有工人进行检查。此外,在每个工作日的三个不同时间为每个受试者采集血样。行为测试组包括简单反应时间测试、警觉性测试、短期记忆测试(数字广度)和知觉测试(符号数字)。对每个工人的四次脑电图记录进行盲法判断,并根据α活动的数量和稳定性进行分类。血样用于分析工作日期间以下激素可能发生的变化:促甲状腺激素、促黄体生成素、促卵泡激素、催乳素、皮质醇、睾酮和新蝶呤。使用参数检验和非参数检验对结果进行的详细分析表明,两种情况之间没有统计学上的显著差异可归因于暴露于电场和磁场。