Suppr超能文献

胶质母细胞瘤患者中靶向癌症干细胞的化学预测分析

Analysis of Chemopredictive Assay for Targeting Cancer Stem Cells in Glioblastoma Patients.

作者信息

Howard Candace M, Valluri Jagan, Alberico Anthony, Julien Terrence, Mazagri Rida, Marsh Robert, Alastair Hoyt, Cortese Antonio, Griswold Michael, Wang Wanmei, Denning Krista, Brown Linda, Claudio Pier Paolo

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216.

Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755.

出版信息

Transl Oncol. 2017 Apr;10(2):241-254. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Feb 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) treated with standard-of-care maximal surgical resection and concurrent adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ)/radiotherapy remains very poor (less than 15 months). GBMs have been found to contain a small population of cancer stem cells (CSCs) that contribute to tumor propagation, maintenance, and treatment resistance. The highly invasive nature of high-grade gliomas and their inherent resistance to therapy lead to very high rates of recurrence. For these reasons, not all patients with similar diagnoses respond to the same chemotherapy, schedule, or dose. Administration of ineffective anticancer therapy is not only costly but more importantly burdens the patient with unnecessary toxicity and selects for the development of resistant cancer cell clones. We have developed a drug response assay (ChemoID) that identifies the most effective chemotherapy against CSCs and bulk of tumor cells from of a panel of potential treatments, offering great promise for individualized cancer management. Providing the treating physician with drug response information on a panel of approved drugs will aid in personalized therapy selections of the most effective chemotherapy for individual patients, thereby improving outcomes. A prospective study was conducted evaluating the use of the ChemoID drug response assay in GBM patients treated with standard of care.

METHODS

Forty-one GBM patients (mean age 54 years, 59% male), all eligible for a surgical biopsy, were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol, and fresh tissue samples were collected for drug sensitivity testing. Patients were all treated with standard-of-care TMZ plus radiation with or without maximal surgery, depending on the status of the disease. Patients were prospectively monitored for tumor response, time to recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Odds ratio (OR) associations of 12-month recurrence, PFS, and OS outcomes were estimated for CSC, bulk tumor, and combined assay responses for the standard-of-care TMZ treatment; sensitivities/specificities, areas under the curve (AUCs), and risk reclassification components were examined.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 8 months (range 3-49 months). For every 5% increase in in vitro CSC cell kill by TMZ, 12-month patient response (nonrecurrence of cancer) increased two-fold, OR=2.2 (P=.016). Similar but somewhat less supported associations with the bulk tumor test were seen, OR=2.75 (P=.07) for each 5% bulk tumor cell kill by TMZ. Combining CSC and bulk tumor assay results in a single model yielded a statistically supported CSC association, OR=2.36 (P=.036), but a much attenuated remaining bulk tumor association, OR=1.46 (P=.472). AUCs and [sensitivity/specificity] at optimal outpoints (>40% CSC cell kill and >55% bulk tumor cell kill) were AUC=0.989 [sensitivity=100/specificity=97], 0.972 [100/89], and 0.989 [100/97] for the CSC only, bulk tumor only, and combined models, respectively. Risk categorization of patients was improved by 11% when using the CSC test in conjunction with the bulk test (risk reclassification nonevent net reclassification improvement [NRI] and overall NRI=0.111, P=.030). Median recurrence time was 20 months for patients with a positive (>40% cell kill) CSC test versus only 3 months for those with a negative CSC test, whereas median recurrence time was 13 months versus 4 months for patients with a positive (>55% cell kill) bulk test versus negative. Similar favorable results for the CSC test were observed for PFS and OS outcomes. Panel results across 14 potential other treatments indicated that 34/41 (83%) potentially more optimal alternative therapies may have been chosen using CSC results, whereas 27/41 (66%) alternative therapies may have been chosen using bulk tumor results.

CONCLUSIONS

The ChemoID CSC drug response assay has the potential to increase the accuracy of bulk tumor assays to help guide individualized chemotherapy choices. GBM cancer recurrence may occur quickly if the CSC test has a low in vitro cell kill rate even if the bulk tumor test cell kill rate is high.

摘要

引言

采用标准治疗方案进行最大程度手术切除并联合辅助替莫唑胺(TMZ)/放疗的胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者预后仍然很差(不到15个月)。已发现GBM中含有一小部分癌症干细胞(CSC),它们有助于肿瘤的增殖、维持和治疗抵抗。高级别胶质瘤具有高度侵袭性且对治疗具有固有抗性,导致复发率非常高。由于这些原因,并非所有诊断相似的患者对相同的化疗、方案或剂量都有反应。给予无效的抗癌治疗不仅成本高昂,更重要的是会让患者承受不必要的毒性,还会促使耐药癌细胞克隆的产生。我们开发了一种药物反应检测方法(ChemoID),可从一组潜在治疗方法中识别出针对CSC和大部分肿瘤细胞最有效的化疗药物,为个性化癌症管理带来了巨大希望。为治疗医生提供一组已批准药物的药物反应信息将有助于为个体患者选择最有效的化疗进行个性化治疗,从而改善治疗结果。我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,评估ChemoID药物反应检测方法在接受标准治疗的GBM患者中的应用。

方法

41例GBM患者(平均年龄54岁,59%为男性),均符合手术活检条件,被纳入一项经机构审查委员会批准的方案,并收集新鲜组织样本进行药物敏感性检测。患者均接受标准治疗的TMZ联合放疗,根据疾病状况决定是否进行最大程度手术。对患者进行前瞻性监测,观察肿瘤反应、复发时间、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。估计了CSC、肿瘤主体和联合检测对标准治疗TMZ治疗的12个月复发、PFS和OS结果的优势比(OR)关联;检查了敏感性/特异性、曲线下面积(AUC)和风险重新分类成分。

结果

中位随访时间为8个月(范围3 - 49个月)。TMZ使体外CSC细胞杀伤率每增加5%,患者12个月反应(癌症无复发)增加两倍,OR = 2.2(P = 0.016)。在肿瘤主体检测中也观察到类似但支持力度稍弱的关联,TMZ使肿瘤主体细胞杀伤率每增加5%,OR = 2.75(P = 0.07)。将CSC和肿瘤主体检测结果合并到一个单一模型中,得到了具有统计学支持的CSC关联,OR = 2.36(P = 0.036),但剩余的肿瘤主体关联大幅减弱,OR = 1.46(P = 0.472)。在最佳切点(>40% CSC细胞杀伤和>55%肿瘤主体细胞杀伤)时,CSC单独检测、肿瘤主体单独检测和联合模型的AUC及[敏感性/特异性]分别为AUC = 0.989 [敏感性 = 100/特异性 = 97]、0.972 [100/89]和0.989 [100/97]。当将CSC检测与肿瘤主体检测结合使用时,患者的风险分类改善了11%(风险重新分类无事件净重新分类改善[NRI]和总体NRI = 0.111,P = 0.030)。CSC检测呈阳性(>40%细胞杀伤)的患者中位复发时间为20个月,而CSC检测呈阴性的患者仅为3个月,肿瘤主体检测呈阳性(>55%细胞杀伤)的患者中位复发时间为13个月,阴性患者为4个月。在PFS和OS结果方面,CSC检测也观察到类似的良好结果。对14种潜在其他治疗方法的检测结果表明,使用CSC结果可能会选择34/41(83%)潜在更优的替代疗法,而使用肿瘤主体结果可能会选择27/41(66%)替代疗法。

结论

ChemoID CSC药物反应检测方法有可能提高肿瘤主体检测的准确性,以帮助指导个性化化疗选择。即使肿瘤主体检测的细胞杀伤率很高,但如果CSC检测的体外细胞杀伤率很低,GBM癌症仍可能很快复发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c54/5310181/08f2c1cda246/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验