Rasanathan Jennifer J K, MacCarthy Sarah, Diniz Debora, Torreele Els, Gruskin Sofia
Jennifer J. K. Rasanathan is with the Public Health Program, Open Society Foundations, New York, NY. Sarah MacCarthy is with Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Debora Diniz is with the Faculty of Law, University of Brasília, Brasília DF, Brazil. Els Torreele is with Access to Medicines and Innovation, Public Health Program, Open Society Foundations. Sofia Gruskin is with the Keck School of Medicine, Gould School of Law, and Program on Global Health and Human Rights, Institute for Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Am J Public Health. 2017 Apr;107(4):525-531. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303658. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
In late 2015, an increase in the number of infants born with microcephaly in poor communities in northeast Brazil prompted investigation of antenatal Zika infection as the cause. Zika now circulates in 69 countries, and has affected pregnancies of women in 29 countries. Public health officials, policymakers, and international organizations are considering interventions to address health consequences of the Zika epidemic. To date, public health responses have focused on mosquito vector eradication, sexual and reproductive health services, knowledge and technology including diagnostic test and vaccine development, and health system preparedness. We summarize responses to date and apply human rights and related principles including nondiscrimination, participation, the legal and policy context, and accountability to identify shortcomings and to offer suggestions for more equitable, effective, and sustainable Zika responses.
2015年末,巴西东北部贫困社区中出生时患有小头症的婴儿数量增加,促使人们对孕期感染寨卡病毒这一病因展开调查。寨卡病毒目前在69个国家传播,已影响到29个国家妇女的妊娠情况。公共卫生官员、政策制定者和国际组织正在考虑采取干预措施,以应对寨卡疫情带来的健康后果。迄今为止,公共卫生应对措施主要集中在消灭蚊虫媒介、性健康和生殖健康服务、知识与技术(包括诊断测试和疫苗研发)以及卫生系统准备方面。我们总结了迄今为止的应对措施,并应用人权及相关原则,包括不歧视、参与、法律和政策背景以及问责制,以找出不足之处,并为更公平、有效和可持续的寨卡应对措施提供建议。