• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估在线肾脏饮食信息的质量和健康素养需求。

Evaluation of the quality and health literacy demand of online renal diet information.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Nutrition, Wollongong Hospital, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

School of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017 Oct;30(5):634-645. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12466. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1111/jhn.12466
PMID:28211108
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dietary modification is critical in the self-management of chronic kidney disease. The present study describes the accuracy, quality and health literacy demand of renal diet information for adults with kidney disease obtained from the Internet and YouTube (www.youtube.com).

METHODS

A comprehensive content analysis was undertaken in April and July 2015 of 254 eligible websites and 161 YouTube videos. The accuracy of the renal diet information was evaluated by comparing the key messages with relevant evidence-based guidelines for the dietary management of people with kidney disease. The DISCERN tool (www.discern.org.uk) was used to evaluate the quality of the material. Health literacy demand was evaluated using the Patient Education Material Assessment Tool (www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve/self-mgmt/pemat/index.html) and seven validated readability calculators.

RESULTS

The most frequent renal diet topic found online was generic dietary information for people with chronic kidney disease. The proportion of renal diet information obtained from websites that was accurate was 73%. However, this information was mostly of poor quality with extensive shortcomings, difficult to action and written with a high health literacy demand. By contrast, renal diet information available from YouTube was highly understandable and actionable, although only 18% of the videos were accurate, and a large proportion were of poor quality with extensive shortcomings. The most frequent authors of accurate, good quality, understandable, material were government bodies, dietitians, academic institutions and medical organisations.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal diet information found online that is written by government bodies, dietitians, academic institutions and medical organisations is recommended. Further work is required to improve the quality and, most importantly, the actionability of renal diet information found online.

摘要

背景

饮食调整对于慢性肾病的自我管理至关重要。本研究描述了从互联网和 YouTube(www.youtube.com)上获取的针对肾病患者的成人肾脏饮食信息的准确性、质量和健康素养需求。

方法

2015 年 4 月和 7 月,对 254 个符合条件的网站和 161 个 YouTube 视频进行了全面的内容分析。通过将关键信息与针对肾病患者饮食管理的相关循证指南进行比较,评估肾脏饮食信息的准确性。使用 DISCERN 工具(www.discern.org.uk)评估材料的质量。使用患者教育材料评估工具(www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve/self-mgmt/pemat/index.html)和 7 个经过验证的可读性计算器评估健康素养需求。

结果

在线上最常见的肾脏饮食主题是针对慢性肾脏病患者的一般饮食信息。从网站上获取的肾脏饮食信息中,准确的比例为 73%。然而,这些信息的质量大多较差,存在广泛的缺陷,难以付诸行动,并且对健康素养有较高的要求。相比之下,从 YouTube 上获取的肾脏饮食信息通俗易懂,可操作性强,尽管只有 18%的视频是准确的,但很大一部分视频质量较差,存在广泛的缺陷。准确、质量好、易懂的信息最常由政府机构、营养师、学术机构和医疗机构撰写。

结论

推荐使用政府机构、营养师、学术机构和医疗机构撰写的在线肾脏饮食信息。需要进一步努力提高在线肾脏饮食信息的质量,最重要的是提高其可操作性。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the quality and health literacy demand of online renal diet information.评估在线肾脏饮食信息的质量和健康素养需求。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017 Oct;30(5):634-645. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12466. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
2
Update on the Quality and Health Literacy Demand of Diet-Related Videos on YouTube for People With Polycystic Kidney Disease.关于 YouTube 上与多囊肾病患者相关的饮食视频的质量和健康素养需求的最新进展。
J Ren Nutr. 2023 May;33(3):495-498. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
3
Evaluation of the scope, quality, and health literacy demand of Internet-based anal cancer information.基于互联网的肛门癌信息的范围、质量和健康素养需求评估。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Oct;107(4):527-537. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.393. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
4
Should We Recommend Renal Diet-Related Apps to Our Patients? An Evaluation of the Quality and Health Literacy Demand of Renal Diet-Related Mobile Applications.我们应该向患者推荐与肾脏饮食相关的应用程序吗?对肾脏饮食相关移动应用程序的质量和健康素养需求的评估。
J Ren Nutr. 2017 Nov;27(6):430-438. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2017.06.007.
5
Designing Dietary Education Materials for People With Chronic Kidney Disease: Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Resources.为慢性肾病患者设计饮食教育材料:提高资源质量的建议
J Ren Nutr. 2023 Jan;33(1):208-213. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
6
Evaluating online patient education materials for liver cirrhosis.评估肝硬化的在线患者教育资料。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Aug;193(4):1799-1806. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03645-1. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
7
An Evaluation of the Readability and Content-Quality of Pelvic Organ Prolapse YouTube Transcripts.盆底器官脱垂YouTube视频文字记录的可读性与内容质量评估
Urology. 2021 Aug;154:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
8
Quality and Health Literacy Demand of Online Heart Failure Information.在线心力衰竭信息的质量与健康素养需求
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):156-164. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000324.
9
Otoplasty Online Information: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Websites and Videos that Patients View Regarding Cosmetic Ear Surgery.耳整形术在线信息:对患者浏览的有关耳部整形手术的网站和视频的综合分析。
Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Feb;34(1):82-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1615280. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
10
Evaluation of the Heart Failure in Internet Patient Information: Descriptive Survey Study.评估互联网患者信息中的心力衰竭:描述性调查研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 25;18(3):1047. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031047.

引用本文的文献

1
Arabic version of the patient education materials assessment tool (PEMAT): translation and validation.患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)的阿拉伯语版本:翻译与验证
Saudi Pharm J. 2025 Jun 5;33(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s44446-025-00013-7.
2
Appropriate trust in online health information is associated with information platform, commercial status, and misinformation in patients with high cardiovascular risk.对在线健康信息的适度信任与心血管高危患者的信息平台、商业状况及错误信息相关。
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 29;11:20552076251334438. doi: 10.1177/20552076251334438. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Designing Better Resources: Consumer Experiences, Priorities and Preferences Regarding Contemporary Nutrition Education Materials.
设计更好的资源:消费者对当代营养教育材料的体验、优先事项和偏好
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Apr;38(2):e70041. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70041.
4
Content accuracy and readability of dietary advice available on webpages: A systematic review of the evidence.网页上提供的饮食建议的内容准确性和可读性:系统评价证据。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Feb;38(1):e13395. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13395.
5
Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding malnutrition amongst patients with chronic kidney disease in China: A qualitative study.中国慢性肾病患者对营养不良的认知、态度及行为:一项定性研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jul 11;13:233. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1378_23. eCollection 2024.
6
Readability analysis of ChatGPT's responses on lung cancer.肺癌相关问题的 ChatGPT 回复可读性分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 26;14(1):17234. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67293-2.
7
Investigation of the quality and health literacy demand of online information on pelvic floor exercises to reduce stress urinary incontinence.关于盆底肌锻炼以减轻压力性尿失禁的在线信息的质量及健康素养需求调查。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;64(6):542-547. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13830. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
8
#Fail: the quality and accuracy of nutrition-related information by influential Australian Instagram accounts.失败:有影响力的澳大利亚 Instagram 账户提供的营养相关信息的质量和准确性。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Feb 14;21(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01565-y.
9
The individual-level effects of social media campaigns related to healthy eating, physical activity, and healthy weight: A narrative review.与健康饮食、体育活动和健康体重相关的社交媒体活动的个体层面影响:一项叙述性综述。
Obes Sci Pract. 2024 Jan 4;10(1):e731. doi: 10.1002/osp4.731. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Web-Based Content on Diet and Nutrition Written in Japanese: Infodemiology Study Based on Google Trends and Google Search.基于谷歌趋势和谷歌搜索的日本语饮食与营养网络内容:信息流行病学研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 16;7:e47101. doi: 10.2196/47101.