Koffijberg Kees, Schekkerman Hans, van der Jeugd Henk, Hornman Menno, van Winden Erik
Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland, P.O. Box 6521, 6503 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Vogeltrekstation, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), P.O. Box 50, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):241-250. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0885-3.
The Netherlands is important for wintering migratory herbivorous geese, numbers of which have rapidly increased, leading to conflict with agriculture. In 2005/2006, a new goose management policy aimed to limit compensation payments to farmers by concentrating foraging geese in 80 000 ha of designated 'go' areas-where farmers received payment to accommodate them-and scaring geese from 'no go' areas elsewhere. Monthly national counts of four abundant goose species during 10 years prior to the new policy and in 8 years following implementation found that 57% of all goose days were spent within 'go' areas under the new management, the same as prior to implementation. Such lack of response suggests no predicted learning effects, perhaps because of (i) increases in abundance outside of 'go' areas, (ii) irregularly shaped boundaries and enclaves of 'no go' farmland within 'go' areas and/or (iii) insufficient differences in disturbance levels within and outside designated areas.
荷兰对于越冬的迁徙食草鹅来说很重要,其数量迅速增加,导致了与农业的冲突。在2005/2006年,一项新的鹅管理政策旨在通过将觅食的鹅集中在8万公顷指定的“允许”区域来限制对农民的补偿支付,在这些区域农民因接纳鹅而获得报酬,同时将鹅从其他地方的“禁止”区域吓跑。在新政策实施前的10年以及实施后的8年里,每月对四种数量众多的鹅种进行全国统计,结果发现,在新管理措施下,所有鹅日的57%是在“允许”区域度过的,这与实施前相同。这种缺乏反应表明没有预期的学习效果,可能是因为(i)“允许”区域之外数量的增加,(ii)“允许”区域内“禁止”农田形状不规则的边界和飞地,和/或(iii)指定区域内外干扰水平差异不足。