Glaser Sally L, Canchola Alison J, Keegan Theresa H M, Clarke Christina A, Longacre Teri A, Gulley Margaret L
Cancer Prevention Institute of California, 2201 Walnut Avenue, Suite 300, Fremont, CA, 94538, USA.
Department of Health Research and Policy (Epidemiology), Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94306, USA.
Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Apr;28(4):273-287. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0865-3. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
A relationship of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and breast cancer etiology and outcome may have clinical utility and potential to enhance understanding of tumor biology. Research to date has yielded variable results, likely reflecting differing virus detection assays and unaddressed epidemiologic heterogeneity across studies.
Applying our novel, five-target assay detection strategy in an exploratory study, we examined demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics, and overall survival, associated with EBV positivity in breast adenocarcinomas from 59 non-Hispanic white and 68 Hispanic women sampled by age (<50, 50+) and stage (localized, regional/remote) and examined associations based on single assay targets.
EBV was localized only to lymphocytes. Nevertheless, viral prevalence, although low, varied across patient subgroups. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for EBV positivity were lower for younger Hispanic than white women (p = 0.05), and marginally higher for larger [OR (95% confidence intervals) 1.03 (1.00-1.05) per mm increase] and right-sided [2.8 (0.97-7.8)] tumors. In whites, ORs were marginally higher for larger tumors [1.04 (1.00-1.07)] and marginally lower for age 50+ [0.24 (0.06-1.03)]; in Hispanics, ORs were higher for ER negative [5.6 (1.1-30.5)], and marginally higher for right-sided, tumors [5.8 (0.94-36.2)]. Survival was suggestively poorer for EBV-positive than EBV-negative tumors in older women with localized disease. EBV associations differed across single assay targets, indicating variation in prior findings likely due to assay performance.
The differing EBV associations by age and race/ethnicity suggest a non-random role of EBV in breast cancer and support further study using multi-target assays, relevant epidemiologic design, and a larger study sample.
爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)与乳腺癌病因及预后之间的关系可能具有临床应用价值,并有助于加深对肿瘤生物学的理解。迄今为止的研究结果不一,这可能反映了不同的病毒检测方法以及各研究中未解决的流行病学异质性。
在一项探索性研究中,我们应用新颖的五靶点检测策略,对59名非西班牙裔白人女性和68名西班牙裔女性的乳腺腺癌进行了研究,这些女性按年龄(<50岁、50岁及以上)和分期(局限性、区域/远处)进行抽样,检测了EBV阳性与人口统计学、临床和肿瘤特征以及总生存率之间的关系,并根据单一检测靶点研究了相关性。
EBV仅定位于淋巴细胞。然而,病毒流行率虽低,但在不同患者亚组中有所差异。西班牙裔年轻女性EBV阳性的校正比值比(OR)低于白人女性(p = 0.05),而肿瘤较大[每增加1毫米,OR(95%置信区间)为1.03(1.00 - 1.05)]和右侧肿瘤[2.8(0.97 - 7.8)]的校正比值比略高。在白人中,肿瘤较大时OR略高[1.04(1.00 - 1.07)],50岁及以上时OR略低[0.24(0.06 - 1.03)];在西班牙裔中,雌激素受体阴性肿瘤的OR较高[5.6(1.1 - 30.5)],右侧肿瘤的OR略高[5.8(0.94 - 36.2)]。在患有局限性疾病的老年女性中,EBV阳性肿瘤的生存率似乎比EBV阴性肿瘤更差。EBV的相关性在单一检测靶点之间存在差异,这表明先前研究结果的差异可能是由于检测性能所致。
EBV在年龄和种族/民族方面的不同相关性表明其在乳腺癌中具有非随机作用,支持使用多靶点检测、相关流行病学设计和更大的研究样本进行进一步研究。