Goel Reema, Bitzer Zachary, Reilly Samantha M, Trushin Neil, Foulds Jonathan, Muscat Joshua, Liao Jason, Elias Ryan J, Richie John P
Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States.
Department of Food Science, Pennsylvania State University, College of Agricultural Sciences , University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.
Chem Res Toxicol. 2017 Apr 17;30(4):1038-1045. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00359. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
Free radicals in tobacco smoke are thought to be an important cause of smoking-induced diseases, yet the variation in free radical exposure to smokers from different brands of commercially available cigarettes is unknown. We measured the levels of highly reactive gas-phase and stable particulate-phase radicals in mainstream cigarette smoke by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy with and without the spin-trapping agent phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone (PBN), respectively, in 27 popular US cigarettes and the 3R4F research cigarette, machine-smoked according to the FTC protocol. We find a 12-fold variation in the levels of gas-phase radicals (1.2 to 14 nmol per cigarette) and a 2-fold variation in the amounts of particulate-phase radicals (44 to 96 pmol per cigarette) across the range of cigarette brands. Gas and particulate-phase radicals were highly correlated across brands (ρ = 0.62, p < 0.001). Both radicals were correlated with TPM (gas-phase: ρ = 0.38, p = 0.04; particulate-phase: ρ = 0.44, p = 0.02) and ventilation (gas- and tar-phase: ρ = -0.58, p = 0.001), with ventilation explaining nearly 30% of the variation in radical levels across brands. Overall, our findings of significant brand variation in free radical delivery under standardized machine-smoked conditions suggest that the use of certain brands of cigarettes may be associated with greater levels of oxidative stress in smokers.
烟草烟雾中的自由基被认为是吸烟所致疾病的一个重要原因,但不同品牌市售香烟的吸烟者所接触的自由基差异尚不清楚。我们分别使用和不使用自旋捕获剂苯基 - N - 叔丁基硝酮(PBN),通过电子顺磁共振(EPR)光谱法测量了27种美国流行香烟和3R4F研究用香烟主流烟雾中高活性气相自由基和稳定颗粒相自由基的水平,这些香烟按照联邦贸易委员会(FTC)协议进行机器抽吸。我们发现,在整个香烟品牌范围内,气相自由基水平有12倍的差异(每支香烟1.2至14纳摩尔),颗粒相自由基含量有2倍的差异(每支香烟44至96皮摩尔)。不同品牌的气相和颗粒相自由基高度相关(ρ = 0.62,p < 0.001)。两种自由基均与每口焦油量(TPM)相关(气相:ρ = 0.38,p = 0.04;颗粒相:ρ = 0.44,p = 0.02)以及通风情况相关(气相和焦油相:ρ = -0.58,p = 0.001),通风情况解释了不同品牌自由基水平近30%的变化。总体而言,我们在标准化机器抽吸条件下关于自由基释放存在显著品牌差异的研究结果表明,使用某些品牌的香烟可能会使吸烟者体内的氧化应激水平更高。