• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

搜索策略对于在开阔地形中寻找目标的重要性。

The importance of search strategy for finding targets in open terrain.

作者信息

Riggs Charlotte A, Cornes Katherine, Godwin Hayward J, Liversedge Simon P, Guest Richard, Donnelly Nick

机构信息

University of Southampton, School of Psychology, Highfield, Southampton, Hampshire SO17 1BJ UK.

University of Kent, School of Engineering and Digital Arts, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NT UK.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0049-4. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-017-0049-4
PMID:28275707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5318482/
Abstract

A number of real-world search tasks (i.e. police search, detection of improvised explosive devices (IEDs)) require searchers to search exhaustively across open ground. In the present study, we simulated this problem by asking individuals (Experiments 1a and 1b) and dyads (Experiment 2) to search for coin targets pseudo-randomly located in a bounded area of open grassland terrain. In Experiment 1a, accuracy, search time, and the route used to search an area were measured. Participants tended to use an 'S'-shaped pattern with a common width of search lane. Increased accuracy was associated with slower, but also variable, search speed, though only when participants moved along the length (as opposed to across the width) of the search area. Experiment 1b varied the number of targets available within the bounded search area and in doing so varied target prevalence and density. The results confirmed that the route taken in Experiment 1a generalizes across variations in target prevalence/density. In Experiment 2, accuracy, search time, and the search strategy used by dyads was measured. While dyads were more accurate than individuals, dyads that opted to conduct two independent searches were more accurate than those who opted to split the search space. The implications of these results for individuals and dyads when searching for targets in open space are discussed.

摘要

许多现实世界中的搜索任务(如警方搜索、简易爆炸装置(IED)探测)要求搜索者在开阔地面上进行彻底搜索。在本研究中,我们通过让个体(实验1a和1b)和二人组(实验2)搜索伪随机放置在有界开阔草地地形区域内的硬币目标来模拟这个问题。在实验1a中,测量了搜索一个区域的准确性、搜索时间和使用的路线。参与者倾向于使用具有共同搜索通道宽度的“S”形模式。准确性的提高与较慢但也变化不定的搜索速度相关,不过这仅当参与者沿着搜索区域的长度(而非宽度)移动时才成立。实验1b改变了有界搜索区域内可用目标的数量,从而改变了目标的流行程度和密度。结果证实,实验1a中采用的路线在目标流行程度/密度的变化中具有普遍性。在实验2中,测量了二人组的准确性、搜索时间和使用的搜索策略。虽然二人组比个体更准确,但选择进行两次独立搜索的二人组比那些选择划分搜索空间的二人组更准确。讨论了这些结果对于个体和二人组在开阔空间中搜索目标时的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/a413ccb1522a/41235_2017_49_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/31949e7f9396/41235_2017_49_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/d90255c4f025/41235_2017_49_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/de043cd7e3f1/41235_2017_49_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/33d53ae611ad/41235_2017_49_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/d9c7cbaaca93/41235_2017_49_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/1416f88690de/41235_2017_49_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/490d531e07fe/41235_2017_49_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/ca46627097de/41235_2017_49_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/a413ccb1522a/41235_2017_49_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/31949e7f9396/41235_2017_49_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/d90255c4f025/41235_2017_49_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/de043cd7e3f1/41235_2017_49_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/33d53ae611ad/41235_2017_49_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/d9c7cbaaca93/41235_2017_49_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/1416f88690de/41235_2017_49_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/490d531e07fe/41235_2017_49_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/ca46627097de/41235_2017_49_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4d/6091431/a413ccb1522a/41235_2017_49_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The importance of search strategy for finding targets in open terrain.搜索策略对于在开阔地形中寻找目标的重要性。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0049-4. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
2
Different predictors of multiple-target search accuracy between nonprofessional and professional visual searchers.非专业和专业视觉搜索者在多目标搜索准确性方面的不同预测因素。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(7):1335-48. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.859715. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
3
Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.混合觅食搜索:搜索多种类型目标的多个实例。
Vision Res. 2016 Feb;119:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
4
Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target-color items.搜索两类目标会使注视目标颜色项目的次数减少。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012 Dec;18(4):404-18. doi: 10.1037/a0031032.
5
A bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search.人类视觉搜索的贝叶斯最优觅食模型。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep 1;23(9):1047-54. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440460. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
6
Visual search for rare targets: distracter tuning as a mechanism for learning from repeated target-absent searches.视觉搜索稀有目标:分心物调谐作为从重复目标缺失搜索中学习的机制。
Br J Psychol. 2011 Aug;102(3):313-27. doi: 10.1348/000712610X519503. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
7
How humans react to changing rewards during visual foraging.人类在视觉觅食过程中如何对不断变化的奖励做出反应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2299-2309. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1411-9.
8
Context matters: the structure of task goals affects accuracy in multiple-target visual search.语境很重要:任务目标的结构会影响多目标视觉搜索的准确性。
Appl Ergon. 2014 May;45(3):528-33. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
9
How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search.你能多快改变主意?视觉搜索中自上而下引导的速度。
Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1411-26. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024.
10
Visual search performance in 'CCTV' and mobile phone-like video footage.闭路电视和手机式视频片段中的视觉搜索性能。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Sep 24;6(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00326-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Easy does it: Selection during interactive search tasks is biased towards objects that can be examined easily.慢慢来:交互式搜索任务中的选择偏向于易于检查的对象。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03083-w.
2
The impact of different distractions on outdoor visual search and object memory.不同干扰源对户外视觉搜索和物体记忆的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 4;13(1):16700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43679-6.
3
A Bayesian Statistical Model Is Able to Predict Target-by-Target Selection Behaviour in a Human Foraging Task.

本文引用的文献

1
CancellationTools: All-in-one software for administration and analysis of cancellation tasks.取消工具:用于管理和分析取消任务的一体化软件。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1065-1075. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0522-7.
2
Spatial reference frame of attention in a large outdoor environment.大型户外环境中注意力的空间参照系。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1346-57. doi: 10.1037/a0036779. Epub 2014 May 19.
3
Use of the visual range of detection to estimate effective sweep width for land search and rescue based on 10 detection experiments in North America.
贝叶斯统计模型能够预测人类觅食任务中逐个目标的选择行为。
Vision (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;6(4):66. doi: 10.3390/vision6040066.
4
Towards Interactive Search: Investigating Visual Search in a Novel Real-World Paradigm.迈向交互式搜索:在一种新型现实世界范式中研究视觉搜索
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 1;10(12):927. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120927.
5
Proactive and reactive control mechanisms in navigational search.导航搜索中的主动和被动控制机制。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Feb;75(2):348-361. doi: 10.1177/1747021820958923. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
6
The Top 100 Highly Cited Original Articles on Immunotherapy for Childhood Leukemia.儿童白血病免疫治疗领域被引频次最高的100篇原创文章。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 24;10:1100. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01100. eCollection 2019.
7
What do we know about volumetric medical image interpretation?: a review of the basic science and medical image perception literatures.我们对容积医学图像解读了解多少?:基础科学与医学图像感知文献综述
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Jul 8;4(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0171-6.
基于在北美的10次探测实验,利用视觉探测范围来估计陆地搜索与救援的有效扫描宽度。
Wilderness Environ Med. 2014 Jun;25(2):132-42. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2013.09.016. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
4
Top-down and bottom-up aspects of active search in a real-world environment.现实世界环境中主动搜索的自上而下和自下而上的方面。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2014 Mar;68(1):8-19. doi: 10.1037/cep0000004. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
5
When is it time to move to the next raspberry bush? Foraging rules in human visual search.什么时候该转移到下一片覆盆子丛?人类视觉搜索中的觅食规则。
J Vis. 2013 Jan 1;13(3):10. doi: 10.1167/13.3.10.
6
Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-target visual search.记忆已发现目标会干扰多目标视觉搜索中的后续表现。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1398-408. doi: 10.1037/a0030726. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
7
A bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search.人类视觉搜索的贝叶斯最优觅食模型。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep 1;23(9):1047-54. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440460. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
8
Visual search: a retrospective.视觉搜索:一项回顾性研究。
J Vis. 2011 Dec 30;11(5):14. doi: 10.1167/11.5.14.
9
The impact of Relative Prevalence on dual-target search for threat items from airport X-ray screening.相对患病率对从机场X光安检中双重目标搜索威胁物品的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 May;134(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
10
Eye movement trajectories in active visual search: contributions of attention, memory, and scene boundaries to pattern formation.主动视觉搜索中的眼动轨迹:注意力、记忆和场景边界对模式形成的贡献。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jan;72(1):114-41. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.1.114.