Goldenberg Matthew, Reid Mark William, IsHak Waguih William, Danovitch Itai
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 May 1;174:80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.12.030. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
The use of cannabis or cannabinoids to treat medical conditions and/or alleviate symptoms is increasingly common. However, the impact of this use on patient reported outcomes, such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL), remains unclear.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, employing guidelines from Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We categorized studies based on design, targeted disease condition, and type of cannabis or cannabinoid used. We scored studies based on quality and risk of bias. After eliminating some studies because of poor quality or insufficient data, we conducted meta-analyses of remaining studies based on design.
Twenty studies met our pre-defined selection criteria. Eleven studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 2322 participants); the remaining studies were of cohort and cross-sectional design. Studies of cannabinoids were mostly RCTs of higher design quality than studies of cannabis, which utilized smaller self-selected samples in observational studies. Although we did not uncover a significant association between cannabis and cannabinoids for medical conditions and HRQoL, some patients who used them to treat pain, multiple sclerosis, and inflammatory bower disorders have reported small improvements in HRQoL, whereas some HIV patients have reported reduced HRQoL.
The relationship between HRQoL and the use of cannabis or cannabinoids for medical conditions is inconclusive. Some patient populations report improvements whereas others report reductions in HRQoL. In order to inform users, practitioners, and policymakers more clearly, future studies should adhere to stricter research quality guidelines and more clearly report patient outcomes.
使用大麻或大麻素治疗疾病和/或缓解症状的情况越来越普遍。然而,这种使用对患者报告的结果,如健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响仍不明确。
我们按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了系统评价和Meta分析。我们根据设计、目标疾病状况以及所使用的大麻或大麻素类型对研究进行分类。我们根据质量和偏倚风险对研究进行评分。在因质量差或数据不足而排除一些研究后,我们根据设计对其余研究进行了Meta分析。
20项研究符合我们预先定义的选择标准。11项研究为随机对照试验(RCT;2322名参与者);其余研究为队列研究和横断面研究。大麻素研究大多是设计质量高于大麻研究的RCT,大麻研究在观察性研究中使用的是较小的自我选择样本。虽然我们没有发现大麻和大麻素在治疗疾病和HRQoL之间存在显著关联,但一些使用它们治疗疼痛、多发性硬化症和炎症性肠病的患者报告HRQoL有小幅改善,而一些艾滋病患者报告HRQoL下降。
HRQoL与使用大麻或大麻素治疗疾病之间的关系尚无定论。一些患者群体报告有改善,而另一些患者则报告HRQoL下降。为了更清楚地为使用者、从业者和政策制定者提供信息,未来的研究应遵循更严格的研究质量指南,并更清晰地报告患者结果。