Kashyap Gyan Chandra, Singh Shri Kant
Department of Mathematical Demography and Statistics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar Mumbai, 400088, India.
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1253-y.
The purpose of this study was to test the reliability, validity and factor structure of GHQ-12 questionnaire on male tannery workers of India. We have tested three different factor models of the GHQ-12.
This paper used primary data obtained from a cross-sectional household study of tannery workers from Jajmau area of the city of Kanpur in northern India, which was conducted during January-June, 2015, as part of a doctoral program. The study covered 286 tannery workers from the study area. An interview schedule containing GHQ-12 was used for tannery workers who had completed at least 1 year at their present occupation preceding the survey. To test reliability, Cronbach's alpha test was used. The convergent test was used for validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare three factor structures for the GHQ-12.
A total of 286 samples were analyzed in this study. The mean age of the tannery workers in this study was 38 years (SD = 1.42). We found the alpha coefficient to be 0.93 for the complete sample. The value of alpha represents the acceptable internal consistency for all the groups. Each item of scale showed almost the same internal consistency of 0.93 for the male tannery workers. The correlation between factor 1 (Anxiety and Depression) and factor 2 (Social Dysfunction) was 0.92. The correlation between factor 1 (Anxiety and Depression) and factor 3 (Loss of confidence) was the highest 0.98. Comparative fit index (CFI) estimate best-fitted for model-III that gave the CFI value 0.97. The SRMR indicator gave the lowest value 0.031 for the model-III.
The findings suggest that the Hindi version of GHQ-12 is a reliable and valid tool for measuring psychological distress in male tannery workers of Kanpur city, India. Study found that the model proposed by the Graetz was the best fitted model for the data.
本研究旨在测试一般健康问卷-12(GHQ-12)在印度男性制革工人中的信度、效度和因子结构。我们测试了GHQ-12的三种不同因子模型。
本文使用了从印度北部坎普尔市贾伊莫地区制革工人的横断面家庭研究中获得的原始数据,该研究于2015年1月至6月进行,是博士项目的一部分。该研究涵盖了研究区域内的286名制革工人。对于在调查前至少已在当前职业工作1年的制革工人,使用包含GHQ-12的访谈问卷。为测试信度,使用了克朗巴哈α检验。使用收敛效度检验来评估效度。采用验证性因子分析来比较GHQ-12的三种因子结构。
本研究共分析了286个样本。本研究中制革工人的平均年龄为38岁(标准差=1.42)。我们发现完整样本的α系数为0.93。α值代表所有组可接受的内部一致性。量表的每个项目在男性制革工人中显示出几乎相同的内部一致性,均为0.93。因子1(焦虑和抑郁)与因子2(社会功能障碍)之间的相关性为0.92。因子1(焦虑和抑郁)与因子3(信心丧失)之间的相关性最高,为0.98。比较拟合指数(CFI)估计值对模型III的拟合最佳,其CFI值为0.97。模型III的标准化残差均方根(SRMR)指标值最低,为0.031。
研究结果表明,印地语版的GHQ-12是测量印度坎普尔市男性制革工人心理困扰的可靠且有效的工具。研究发现,格雷茨提出的模型是最适合该数据的模型。