Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience,University College London,WC1N 3AR London,United
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e237. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1500254X.
Firestone & Scholl (F&S) postulate that vision proceeds without any direct interference from cognition. We argue that this view is extreme and not in line with the available evidence. Specifically, we discuss two well-established counterexamples: Attention directly affects core aspects of visual processing, and multisensory modulations of vision originate on multiple levels, some of which are unlikely to fall "within perception."
菲尔斯通和舒尔(F&S)假设，视觉的产生不受认知的直接干扰。我们认为这种观点过于极端，与现有证据不符。具体来说，我们讨论了两个公认的反例：注意力直接影响视觉处理的核心方面，以及多感官对视觉的调制起源于多个层次，其中一些不太可能属于“感知”范畴。
