Cognitive and Information Sciences,University of California,Merced,Merced,CA
Department of Cognitive,Linguistic and Psychological Sciences,Brown University,Providence,RI
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e260. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15002678.
The main question that Firestone & Scholl (F&S) pose is whether "what and how we see is functionally independent from what and how we think, know, desire, act, and so forth" (sect. 2, para. 1). We synthesize a collection of concerns from an interdisciplinary set of coauthors regarding F&S's assumptions and appeals to intuition, resulting in their treatment of visual perception as context-free.
Firestone 和 Scholl（F&S）提出的主要问题是，“我们所见所闻的内容在功能上是否独立于我们所思所想、所知所盼、所作所为等等”（第 2 节第 1 段）。我们综合了一组跨学科合著者对 F&S 的假设和对直觉的依赖的关注，这导致他们将视觉感知视为与上下文无关的处理。
