Department of Psychology,University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison,WI
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e251. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15002721.
I applaud Firestone & Scholl (F&S) in calling for more rigor. But, although F&S are correct that some published work on top-down effects suffers from confounds, their sweeping claim that there are no top-down effects on perception is premised on incorrect assumptions. F&S's thesis is wrong. Perception is richly and interestingly influenced by cognition.
我赞同 Firestone 和 Scholl（F&S）提出的更严格的要求。但是，尽管 F&S 正确地指出，一些关于自上而下效应的已发表的工作存在混淆，但他们关于感知没有自上而下效应的笼统说法是基于错误的假设。F&S 的论点是错误的。认知会丰富且有趣地影响感知。
