• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于区分最终引流的类肺炎性胸腔积液和仅用抗生素治愈的类肺炎性胸腔积液的计算机断层扫描评分系统。

Computed tomography scoring system for discriminating between parapneumonic effusions eventually drained and those cured only with antibiotics.

作者信息

Porcel José M, Pardina Marina, Alemán Carmen, Pallisa Esther, Light Richard W, Bielsa Silvia

机构信息

Pleural Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain.

Institute for Biomedical Research in Lleida Dr Pifarré Foundation, IRBLLEIDA, Lleida, Spain.

出版信息

Respirology. 2017 Aug;22(6):1199-1204. doi: 10.1111/resp.13040. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1111/resp.13040
PMID:28370693
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Due to limited data, we aimed to develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based scoring system for identifying those parapneumonic effusions (PPEs) requiring drainage.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with PPE who underwent thoracentesis and a chest CT scan before any attempt to place a tube thoracostomy, if applicable, over an 8-year period was conducted. Eleven chest CT characteristics were compared between 90 patients with complicated PPEs (CPPEs), defined as those which eventually required chest drainage, and 60 with non-complicated effusions (derivation sample). A scoring system was devised with those CT findings identified as independent predictors of CPPE in a logistic regression analysis, and further validated in an independent population of 59 PPE patients.

RESULTS

CT scores predicting CPPE were pleural contrast enhancement (3 points), pleural microbubbles, increased extrapleural fat attenuation and fluid volume ≥400 mL (1 point each). A sum score of ≥4 yielded 84% sensitivity (95% CI: 62-85%), 75% specificity (95% CI: 62-85%), 81% diagnostic accuracy (95% CI: 73-86%), likelihood ratio (LR) positive of 3.4 (95% CI: 2.1-5.4), LR negative of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.13-0.36) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.754-0.904) for labelling CPPE in the derivation set. These results were reproduced in the validation sample. The CT grading scale also exhibited a fair ability to identify patients who needed surgery or would die from the pleural infection (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61-0.9).

CONCLUSION

A novel CT scoring system for adults with PPE may allow clinicians to predict the need for chest tube drainage with good accuracy.

摘要

背景与目的

由于数据有限,我们旨在开发并验证一种基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的评分系统,用于识别那些需要引流的类肺炎性胸腔积液(PPE)。

方法

对所有患有PPE且在尝试进行胸腔闭式引流(如适用)之前接受过胸腔穿刺术和胸部CT扫描的患者进行了为期8年的回顾性研究。比较了90例复杂性PPE(CPPE,定义为最终需要胸腔引流的患者)和60例非复杂性胸腔积液患者(推导样本)的11项胸部CT特征。通过逻辑回归分析确定那些CT表现为CPPE的独立预测因素,设计了一个评分系统,并在59例PPE患者的独立人群中进一步验证。

结果

预测CPPE的CT评分标准为胸膜对比增强(3分)、胸膜微气泡、胸膜外脂肪衰减增加和液体量≥400 mL(各1分)。总分≥4分时,推导组中标记CPPE的灵敏度为84%(95%CI:62 - 85%),特异度为75%(95%CI:62 - 85%),诊断准确率为81%(95%CI:73 - 86%),阳性似然比(LR)为3.4(95%CI:2.1 - 5.4),阴性似然比为0.22(95%CI:0.13 - 0.36),受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积为0.829(95%CI:0.754 - 0.904)。这些结果在验证样本中得到了重现。CT分级量表在识别需要手术或会死于胸膜感染的患者方面也表现出一定能力(AUC:0.76,95%CI:0.61 - 0.9)。

结论

一种针对成人PPE的新型CT评分系统可能使临床医生能够较为准确地预测胸腔闭式引流的必要性。

相似文献

1
Computed tomography scoring system for discriminating between parapneumonic effusions eventually drained and those cured only with antibiotics.用于区分最终引流的类肺炎性胸腔积液和仅用抗生素治愈的类肺炎性胸腔积液的计算机断层扫描评分系统。
Respirology. 2017 Aug;22(6):1199-1204. doi: 10.1111/resp.13040. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
2
A Simple Method for Differentiating Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion/Empyema from Parapneumonic Effusion Using the Split Pleura Sign and the Amount of Pleural Effusion on Thoracic CT.一种利用胸腔CT上的胸膜分裂征和胸腔积液量来鉴别复杂性类肺炎性胸腔积液/脓胸与类肺炎性胸腔积液的简单方法。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0130141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130141. eCollection 2015.
3
Chest imaging for the diagnosis of complicated parapneumonic effusions.用于诊断复杂性类肺炎性胸腔积液的胸部影像学检查。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2018 Jul;24(4):398-402. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000485.
4
Usefulness of the British Thoracic Society and the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines in predicting pleural drainage of non-purulent parapneumonic effusions.英国胸科学会和美国胸科医师学会指南在预测非脓性类肺炎性胸腔积液胸腔引流方面的效用。
Respir Med. 2006 May;100(5):933-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.06.017. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
5
Derivation and validation of a CT scan scoring system for discriminating malignant from benign pleural effusions.用于鉴别恶性与良性胸腔积液的CT扫描评分系统的推导与验证
Chest. 2015 Feb;147(2):513-519. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0013.
6
Factors influencing pleural drainage in parapneumonic effusions.影响肺炎旁胸腔积液胸腔引流的因素。
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2016 Oct;216(7):361-366. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 6.
7
CT appearance of parapneumonic effusions in children: findings are not specific for empyema.儿童肺炎旁胸腔积液的CT表现:其表现对脓胸并无特异性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Jul;169(1):179-82. doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.1.9207521.
8
Utility of pleural fluid analysis in predicting tube thoracostomy/decortication in parapneumonic effusions.胸腔积液分析在预测肺炎旁胸腔积液行胸腔闭式引流/胸膜剥脱术中的作用。
Chest. 1991 Oct;100(4):963-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.4.963.
9
Risk Stratification in Patients with Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyema Using the RAPID Score.应用 RAPID 评分对复杂性类肺炎旁胸腔积液和脓胸患者进行风险分层。
Lung. 2018 Oct;196(5):623-629. doi: 10.1007/s00408-018-0146-2. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Tissue Plasminogen Activator and DNase for Complicated Pleural Effusions Secondary to Abdominal Pathology.组织型纤溶酶原激活剂与脱氧核糖核酸酶治疗腹部病变继发复杂性胸腔积液的安全性与有效性
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Mar;14(3):342-346. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-594BC.

引用本文的文献

1
CT features and short-term outcome in cats presenting with pyothorax.患有脓胸的猫的CT特征及短期预后
J Feline Med Surg. 2025 Sep;27(9):1098612X251360637. doi: 10.1177/1098612X251360637. Epub 2025 Sep 4.
2
A Practical Approach to Pleural Infection.胸膜感染的实用治疗方法。
Pulm Ther. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s41030-025-00308-z.
3
Pleural Infection: Diagnosis, Management, and Future Directions.胸膜感染:诊断、管理及未来方向
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 2;14(5):1685. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051685.
4
Diagnosis and management of pleural infection.胸膜感染的诊断与管理
Breathe (Sheff). 2023 Dec;19(4):230146. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0146-2023. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
5
Pleural Space Infections.胸腔感染
Life (Basel). 2023 Jan 29;13(2):376. doi: 10.3390/life13020376.
6
Considerations on Baseline Generation for Imaging AI Studies Illustrated on the CT-Based Prediction of Empyema and Outcome Assessment.基于CT的脓胸预测和结果评估对影像人工智能研究基线生成的思考
J Imaging. 2022 Feb 22;8(3):50. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8030050.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Findings in Pleural Empyema: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胸膜腔积脓影像学表现的诊断准确性:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Imaging. 2021 Dec 28;8(1):3. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8010003.
8
Medical Thoracoscopic Thermal Ablation Therapy for Metastatic Pleural Tumors with Malignant Effusion: An Exploratory Retrospective Study.医学胸腔镜热消融治疗伴恶性胸腔积液的转移性胸膜肿瘤:一项探索性回顾性研究。
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Dec 4;14:9349-9360. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S339596. eCollection 2021.
9
Recent Insights into the Management of Pleural Infection.胸膜感染管理的最新见解
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jul 14;14:3415-3429. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S292705. eCollection 2021.
10
Diagnostics in Pleural Disease.胸膜疾病的诊断
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Dec 4;10(12):1046. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10121046.