Bak N, Ebdrup B H, Oranje B, Fagerlund B, Jensen M H, Düring S W, Nielsen M Ø, Glenthøj B Y, Hansen L K
Centre for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, Mental Health Services Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Centre for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, Mental Health Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 11;7(4):e1087. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.59.
Deficits in information processing and cognition are among the most robust findings in schizophrenia patients. Previous efforts to translate group-level deficits into clinically relevant and individualized information have, however, been non-successful, which is possibly explained by biologically different disease subgroups. We applied machine learning algorithms on measures of electrophysiology and cognition to identify potential subgroups of schizophrenia. Next, we explored subgroup differences regarding treatment response. Sixty-six antipsychotic-naive first-episode schizophrenia patients and sixty-five healthy controls underwent extensive electrophysiological and neurocognitive test batteries. Patients were assessed on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) before and after 6 weeks of monotherapy with the relatively selective D receptor antagonist, amisulpride (280.3±159 mg per day). A reduced principal component space based on 19 electrophysiological variables and 26 cognitive variables was used as input for a Gaussian mixture model to identify subgroups of patients. With support vector machines, we explored the relation between PANSS subscores and the identified subgroups. We identified two statistically distinct subgroups of patients. We found no significant baseline psychopathological differences between these subgroups, but the effect of treatment in the groups was predicted with an accuracy of 74.3% (P=0.003). In conclusion, electrophysiology and cognition data may be used to classify subgroups of schizophrenia patients. The two distinct subgroups, which we identified, were psychopathologically inseparable before treatment, yet their response to dopaminergic blockade was predicted with significant accuracy. This proof of principle encourages further endeavors to apply data-driven, multivariate and multimodal models to facilitate progress from symptom-based psychiatry toward individualized treatment regimens.
信息处理和认知缺陷是精神分裂症患者中最确凿的发现之一。然而,此前将群体水平的缺陷转化为临床相关的个体化信息的努力并未成功,这可能是由于存在生物学上不同的疾病亚组。我们将机器学习算法应用于电生理和认知测量指标,以识别精神分裂症的潜在亚组。接下来,我们探讨了亚组在治疗反应方面的差异。66名未使用过抗精神病药物的首发精神分裂症患者和65名健康对照者接受了广泛的电生理和神经认知测试。患者在使用相对选择性的D受体拮抗剂氨磺必利(每天280.3±159毫克)进行6周单一疗法治疗前后,接受阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评估。基于19个电生理变量和26个认知变量的降维主成分空间被用作高斯混合模型的输入,以识别患者亚组。通过支持向量机,我们探讨了PANSS子分数与所识别亚组之间的关系。我们识别出了两个在统计学上有显著差异的患者亚组。我们发现这些亚组之间在基线精神病理学方面没有显著差异,但对各亚组治疗效果的预测准确率为74.3%(P=0.003)。总之,电生理和认知数据可用于对精神分裂症患者亚组进行分类。我们识别出的这两个不同亚组在治疗前在精神病理学上难以区分,但对多巴胺能阻断的反应却能被显著准确地预测。这一原理证明鼓励进一步努力应用数据驱动的多变量和多模态模型,以推动从基于症状的精神病学向个体化治疗方案的发展。