Deng Wanlu, Rolls Edmund T, Ji Xiaoxi, Robbins Trevor W, Banaschewski Tobias, Bokde Arun L W, Bromberg Uli, Buechel Christian, Desrivières Sylvane, Conrod Patricia, Flor Herta, Frouin Vincent, Gallinat Juergen, Garavan Hugh, Gowland Penny, Heinz Andreas, Ittermann Bernd, Martinot Jean-Luc, Lemaitre Herve, Nees Frauke, Papadopoulos Orfanos Dimitri, Poustka Luise, Smolka Michael N, Walter Henrik, Whelan Robert, Schumann Gunter, Feng Jianfeng
Shanghai Center for Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Jul;38(7):3527-3537. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23607. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
To analyze the involvement of different brain regions in behavioral inhibition and impulsiveness, differences in activation were investigated in fMRI data from a response inhibition task, the stop-signal task, in 1709 participants. First, areas activated more in stop-success (SS) than stop-failure (SF) included the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) extending into the inferior frontal gyrus (ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, BA 47/12), and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Second, the anterior cingulate and anterior insula (AI) were activated more on failure trials, specifically in SF versus SS. The interaction between brain region and SS versus SF activations was significant (P = 5.6 * 10 ). The results provide new evidence from this "big data" investigation consistent with the hypotheses that the lateral OFC is involved in the stop-related processing that inhibits the action; that the DLPFC is involved in attentional processes that influence task performance; and that the AI and anterior cingulate are involved in emotional processes when failure occurs. The investigation thus emphasizes the role of the human lateral OFC BA 47/12 in changing behavior, and inhibiting behavior when necessary. A very similar area in BA47/12 is involved in changing behavior when an expected reward is not obtained, and has been shown to have high functional connectivity in depression. Hum Brain Mapp 38:3527-3537, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
为了分析不同脑区在行为抑制和冲动性中的作用,我们对1709名参与者在一项反应抑制任务(停止信号任务)的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据中的激活差异进行了研究。首先,在停止成功(SS)时比停止失败(SF)时激活更多的区域包括延伸至额下回(腹外侧前额叶皮质,BA 47/12)的外侧眶额皮质(OFC)以及背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)。其次,前扣带回和前岛叶(AI)在失败试验中激活更多,特别是在SF与SS对比时。脑区与SS和SF激活之间的交互作用显著(P = 5.6×10 )。这些结果为这项“大数据”研究提供了新证据,与以下假设一致:外侧OFC参与抑制动作的停止相关处理;DLPFC参与影响任务表现的注意力过程;AI和前扣带回在失败发生时参与情绪过程。因此,该研究强调了人类外侧OFC BA 47/12在改变行为以及在必要时抑制行为方面的作用。当未获得预期奖励时,BA47/12中一个非常相似的区域参与改变行为,并且已被证明在抑郁症中具有高功能连接性。《人类大脑图谱》38:3527 - 3537,2017年。© 2017威利期刊公司。