Lacey Ben, Herrington William G, Preiss David, Lewington Sarah, Armitage Jane
Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
MRC Population Health Research Unit (MRC PHRU), Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017 Jun;19(6):28. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0661-2.
This review discusses the recent evidence for a selection of blood-based emerging risk factors, with particular reference to their relation with coronary heart disease and stroke.
For lipid-related emerging risk factors, recent findings indicate that increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is unlikely to reduce cardiovascular risk, whereas reducing triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and lipoprotein(a) may be beneficial. For inflammatory and hemostatic biomarkers, genetic studies suggest that IL-6 (a pro-inflammatory cytokine) and several coagulation factors are causal for cardiovascular disease, but such studies do not support a causal role for C-reactive protein and fibrinogen. Patients with chronic kidney disease are at high cardiovascular risk with some of this risk not mediated by blood pressure. Randomized evidence (trials or Mendelian) suggests homocysteine and uric acid are unlikely to be key causal mediators of chronic kidney disease-associated risk and sufficiently large trials of interventions which modify mineral bone disease biomarkers are unavailable. Despite not being causally related to cardiovascular disease, there is some evidence that cardiac biomarkers (e.g. troponin) may usefully improve cardiovascular risk scores. Many blood-based factors are strongly associated with cardiovascular risk. Evidence is accumulating, mainly from genetic studies and clinical trials, on which of these associations are causal. Non-causal risk factors may still have value, however, when added to cardiovascular risk scores. Although much of the burden of vascular disease can be explained by 'classic' risk factors (e.g. smoking and blood pressure), studies of blood-based emerging factors have contributed importantly to our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms of vascular disease, and new targets for potential therapies have been identified.
本综述讨论了一系列基于血液的新兴风险因素的最新证据,特别提及它们与冠心病和中风的关系。
对于与脂质相关的新兴风险因素,最近的研究结果表明,升高高密度脂蛋白胆固醇不太可能降低心血管风险,而降低富含甘油三酯的脂蛋白和脂蛋白(a)可能有益。对于炎症和止血生物标志物,基因研究表明白细胞介素-6(一种促炎细胞因子)和几种凝血因子是心血管疾病的病因,但此类研究不支持C反应蛋白和纤维蛋白原的病因作用。慢性肾病患者心血管风险高,其中一些风险并非由血压介导。随机证据(试验或孟德尔研究)表明,同型半胱氨酸和尿酸不太可能是慢性肾病相关风险的关键因果介质,且缺乏足够大的针对改变矿物质骨病生物标志物的干预试验。尽管与心血管疾病无因果关系,但有证据表明心脏生物标志物(如肌钙蛋白)可能有助于改善心血管风险评分。许多基于血液的因素与心血管风险密切相关。关于这些关联中哪些是因果关系的证据正在积累,主要来自基因研究和临床试验。然而,非因果风险因素在加入心血管风险评分时可能仍有价值。尽管血管疾病的许多负担可以用“经典”风险因素(如吸烟和血压)来解释,但对基于血液的新兴因素的研究对我们理解血管疾病的病理生理机制做出了重要贡献,并确定了潜在治疗的新靶点。