• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis by Microscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression: A Technical Note.显微镜下单侧椎板切除术双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症:技术说明
Orthop Surg. 2017 May;9(2):241-246. doi: 10.1111/os.12335. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.腰椎管狭窄症减压性椎板切除术的结果:微创单侧双侧减压椎板切除术与开放椎板切除术的比较:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):179-86. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE13420. Epub 2014 May 30.
3
Advantages of New Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) over Conventional Microscopic ULBD.新式内镜单侧椎板切除术(ULBD)双侧减压相较于传统显微镜 ULBD 的优势。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2020 Sep;12(3):330-336. doi: 10.4055/cios19136. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
4
A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).两种用于腰椎管狭窄症的微创减压手术的前瞻性对比研究:双侧减压单侧椎板切开术(ULBD)与保留肌肉的椎间孔减压术(MILD)。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Feb 15;39(4):332-40. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000136.
5
Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression improves low back pain while standing equally on both sides in patients with lumbar canal stenosis: analysis using a detailed visual analogue scale.单侧椎板切除术用于双侧减压可改善腰椎管狭窄症患者站立时双侧同等程度的下腰痛:使用详细视觉模拟量表的分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Mar 4;20(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2475-6.
6
Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.与传统椎板切除术相比,后路减压技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 11;2015(3):CD010036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010036.pub2.
7
Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 2D Operative Video.腰椎管狭窄症的棘突劈开椎板切除术:二维手术视频
World Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;159:107. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.088. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
8
Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Anatomical and surgical considerations.单侧椎板切开术用于双侧腰椎管减压。第一部分:解剖学与手术考量
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;139(5):392-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01808872.
9
Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression.冲洗式内镜减压椎板切除术。一种用于脊柱狭窄减压的新内镜手术方法。
Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
10
Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.经皮内镜单侧椎板切除术和双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):641-650. doi: 10.1111/os.12925. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction of Spinal Sagittal Alignment after Posterior Lumbar Decompression: Does Severity of Central Canal Stenosis Matter?腰椎后路减压术后脊柱矢状面排列的矫正:中央管狭窄的严重程度有影响吗?
Asian Spine J. 2023 Dec;17(6):1089-1097. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0075. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
2
Effect of Preoperative Marijuana on Patient Outcomes and Opioid Use after Lumbar Decompression.术前使用大麻对腰椎减压术后患者预后及阿片类药物使用的影响。
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):633-638. doi: 10.1177/21925682231203650. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
Comparison of full-endoscopic and tubular-based microscopic decompression in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.全内镜与基于管状显微镜的减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的对比:一项随机对照试验。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2736-2747. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07678-5. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
4
Does Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Adolescent Posterior Ring Apophysis Fracture Accompanied with Lumbar Disc Herniation Have Better Outcome Than Lumbar Disc Herniation Alone?经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗青少年后环骨骺骨折伴腰椎间盘突出症的疗效是否优于单纯腰椎间盘突出症?
J Pain Res. 2023 Mar 16;16:911-919. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S380945. eCollection 2023.
5
Minimally invasive bilateral decompressive lumbar laminectomy with unilateral approach: patient series.微创单侧入路双侧减压腰椎椎板切除术:病例系列
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2022 Feb 14;3(7). doi: 10.3171/CASE21676.
6
The Effect of State-Level Prescription Opioid Legislation on Patient Outcomes After Lumbar Tubular Microdecompression.州级处方阿片类药物立法对腰椎管微减压术后患者预后的影响。
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Jun 16;16(4):720-6. doi: 10.14444/8310.
7
Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Microscope-Assisted Tubular Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation.经皮椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术与显微镜辅助管状椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Jul;13(5):1587-1595. doi: 10.1111/os.12909. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
8
Advantages of New Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) over Conventional Microscopic ULBD.新式内镜单侧椎板切除术(ULBD)双侧减压相较于传统显微镜 ULBD 的优势。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2020 Sep;12(3):330-336. doi: 10.4055/cios19136. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
9
Lumbar microdecompression in elderly versus general adult patients: Comparable outcomes and costs despite group differences.老年患者与普通成年患者的腰椎显微减压术:尽管存在组间差异,但结果和成本相当。
J Orthop. 2019 Sep 11;18:99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.005. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
10
Percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症:系统评价与网状Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(20):e15635. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015635.

本文引用的文献

1
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.后路腰椎滑脱症的椎板切除术联合融合术与单纯椎板切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788.
2
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.随机对照试验:融合手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1413-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721.
3
Microscopic bilateral decompression by unilateral approach in spinal stenosis.脊柱狭窄症单侧入路显微镜下双侧减压术
Eur Spine J. 2016 Aug;25 Suppl 2:270-1. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4479-3.
4
Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.单节段退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者双侧减压的双侧与单侧椎板间入路:175例患者术后疼痛、功能障碍及患者满意度的多中心回顾性研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):326-35. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE13994. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
5
Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.腰椎管狭窄症减压性椎板切除术的结果:微创单侧双侧减压椎板切除术与开放椎板切除术的比较:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):179-86. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE13420. Epub 2014 May 30.
6
Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.全国范围内腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗趋势。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15;38(11):916-26. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182833e7c.
7
Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: is a unilateral microsurgical approach sufficient for decompression?老年患者腰椎管狭窄症:单侧微创手术减压足够吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Mar;14(3):305-12. doi: 10.3171/2010.10.SPINE09708. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
8
Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis?这位下肢疼痛的老年患者是否存在腰椎椎管狭窄的临床综合征?
JAMA. 2010 Dec 15;304(23):2628-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1833.
9
Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis.临床实践。腰椎管狭窄症。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 21;358(8):818-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0708097.
10
Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort.腰椎间盘突出症的手术治疗与非手术治疗:脊柱患者预后研究试验(SPORT)观察性队列研究
JAMA. 2006 Nov 22;296(20):2451-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.20.2451.

显微镜下单侧椎板切除术双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症:技术说明

Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis by Microscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression: A Technical Note.

作者信息

Phan Kevin, Teng Ian, Schultz Konrad, Mobbs Ralph J

机构信息

NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2017 May;9(2):241-246. doi: 10.1111/os.12335. Epub 2017 May 26.

DOI:10.1111/os.12335
PMID:28547809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6584433/
Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis is typically a degenerative condition that leads to compression of the spinal canal and lateral recess, resulting in leg pain and walking disability. Surgical management is indicated after failure of non-surgical management or rapidly worsening neurological impairment. The traditional approach is a laminectomy with foraminotomy and partial facetectomy but a newer minimally invasive option, unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD), seems to demonstrate the better postoperative outcomes due to its unilateral exposure. ULBD involves a midline incision, opening the thoracolumbar fascia, retracting the paravertebral muscles unilaterally, then a hemilaminectomy, flavectomy, and decompression of the spinal canal with foraminotomy or partial facetectomy. The clinical decision on which side to approach spinal stenosis with ULBD has not been discussed in the literature. We have come up with an algorithm to decide which side to approach for ULBD based on position of spinous process and angulation, side of maximal compression, and surgeon handedness.

摘要

腰椎管狭窄症通常是一种退行性疾病,会导致椎管和侧隐窝受压,从而引起腿痛和行走障碍。非手术治疗失败或神经功能障碍迅速恶化后,需进行手术治疗。传统方法是椎板切除术加椎间孔切开术和部分关节突切除术,但一种更新的微创选择,即单侧椎板切除术用于双侧减压(ULBD),由于其单侧暴露,似乎显示出更好的术后效果。ULBD包括中线切口,打开胸腰筋膜,单侧牵开椎旁肌,然后进行半椎板切除术、黄韧带切除术,并通过椎间孔切开术或部分关节突切除术对椎管进行减压。关于采用ULBD治疗椎管狭窄症时选择哪一侧进行手术的临床决策,文献中尚未进行讨论。我们提出了一种算法,根据棘突位置和角度、最大压迫侧以及术者利手来决定ULBD手术的入路侧。