Parker Lucy A, Rumunu John, Jamet Christine, Kenyi Yona, Lino Richard Laku, Wamala Joseph F, Mpairwe Allan M, Muller Vincent, Llosa Augusto E, Uzzeni Florent, Luquero Francisco J, Ciglenecki Iza, Azman Andrew S
Médecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland.
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Department of Public Health, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jun 8;11(6):e0005652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005652. eCollection 2017 Jun.
In June 2015, a cholera outbreak was declared in Juba, South Sudan. In addition to standard outbreak control measures, oral cholera vaccine (OCV) was proposed. As sufficient doses to cover the at-risk population were unavailable, a campaign using half the standard dosing regimen (one-dose) targeted high-risk neighborhoods and groups including neighbors of suspected cases. Here we report the operational details of this first public health use of a single-dose regimen of OCV and illustrate the feasibility of conducting highly targeted vaccination campaigns in an urban area.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Neighborhoods of the city were prioritized for vaccination based on cumulative attack rates, active transmission and local knowledge of known cholera risk factors. OCV was offered to all persons older than 12 months at 20 fixed sites and to select groups, including neighbors of cholera cases after the main campaign ('case-triggered' interventions), through mobile teams. Vaccination coverage was estimated by multi-stage surveys using spatial sampling techniques. 162,377 individuals received a single-dose of OCV in the targeted neighborhoods. In these neighborhoods vaccine coverage was 68.8% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 64.0-73.7) and was highest among children ages 5-14 years (90.0%, 95% CI 85.7-94.3), with adult men being less likely to be vaccinated than adult women (Relative Risk 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.96). In the case-triggered interventions, each lasting 1-2 days, coverage varied (range: 30-87%) with an average of 51.0% (95% CI 41.7-60.3).
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Vaccine supply constraints and the complex realities where cholera outbreaks occur may warrant the use of flexible alternative vaccination strategies, including highly-targeted vaccination campaigns and single-dose regimens. We showed that such campaigns are feasible. Additional work is needed to understand how and when to use different strategies to best protect populations against epidemic cholera.
2015年6月,南苏丹朱巴宣布暴发霍乱疫情。除采取标准的疫情控制措施外,还提议使用口服霍乱疫苗(OCV)。由于没有足够剂量覆盖高危人群,于是开展了一项使用标准剂量一半(单剂量)方案的活动,目标是高危社区和群体,包括疑似病例的邻居。在此,我们报告OCV单剂量方案首次用于公共卫生的操作细节,并说明在城市地区开展高度针对性疫苗接种活动的可行性。
方法/主要发现:根据累计发病率、疫情活跃程度以及当地已知的霍乱风险因素知识,对城市各社区进行疫苗接种优先级排序。在20个固定地点为所有12个月以上的人群提供OCV,并通过流动小组为选定群体接种,包括在主要接种活动之后为霍乱病例的邻居接种(“病例触发”干预措施)。采用空间抽样技术通过多阶段调查估计疫苗接种覆盖率。在目标社区,162,377人接种了单剂量OCV。在这些社区,疫苗接种覆盖率为68.8%(95%置信区间(CI),64.0 - 73.7),在5 - 14岁儿童中最高(90.0%,95% CI 85.7 - 94.3),成年男性接种疫苗的可能性低于成年女性(相对风险0.81,95% CI:0.68 - 0.96)。在“病例触发”干预措施中,每次持续1 - 2天,接种覆盖率各不相同(范围:30 - 87%),平均为51.0%(95% CI 41.7 - 60.3)。
结论/意义:疫苗供应限制以及霍乱暴发地区的复杂现实情况可能需要采用灵活的替代疫苗接种策略,包括高度针对性的疫苗接种活动和单剂量方案。我们证明了此类活动是可行的。还需要进一步开展工作,以了解如何以及何时使用不同策略来最佳地保护人群免受霍乱流行的影响。