Suppr超能文献

直面现实:实验室测量与现实世界测量中的社会关注度比较显示二者几乎没有共同点。

Staring reality in the face: A comparison of social attention across laboratory and real world measures suggests little common ground.

作者信息

Hayward Dana A, Voorhies Willa, Morris Jenna L, Capozzi Francesca, Ristic Jelena

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Concordia University.

Department of Psychology, McGill University.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;71(3):212-225. doi: 10.1037/cep0000117. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

Abstract

The ability to attend to someone else's gaze is thought to represent one of the essential building blocks of the human sociocognitive system. This behavior, termed social attention, has traditionally been assessed using laboratory procedures in which participants' response time and/or accuracy performance indexes attentional function. Recently, a parallel body of emerging research has started to examine social attention during real life social interactions using naturalistic and observational methodologies. The main goal of the present work was to begin connecting these two lines of inquiry. To do so, here we operationalized, indexed, and measured the engagement and shifting components of social attention using covert and overt measures. These measures were obtained during an unconstrained real-world social interaction and during a typical laboratory social cuing task. Our results indicated reliable and overall similar indices of social attention engagement and shifting within each task. However, these measures did not relate across the two tasks. We discuss these results as potentially reflecting the differences in social attention mechanisms, the specificity of the cuing task's measurement, as well as possible general dissimilarities with respect to context, task goals, and/or social presence. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

关注他人目光的能力被认为是人类社会认知系统的基本组成部分之一。这种行为被称为社会注意力,传统上是通过实验室程序进行评估的,在这些程序中,参与者的反应时间和/或准确性表现指标体现了注意力功能。最近,一系列新兴研究开始使用自然主义和观察性方法来研究现实生活中的社交互动中的社会注意力。本研究的主要目标是开始将这两条研究路线联系起来。为此,我们在这里使用隐蔽和公开的测量方法对社会注意力的参与和转移成分进行了操作化、索引和测量。这些测量是在无约束的现实世界社交互动以及典型的实验室社交提示任务中获得的。我们的结果表明,每个任务中社会注意力参与和转移的指标可靠且总体相似。然而,这两项任务的测量结果并不相关。我们将这些结果讨论为可能反映了社会注意力机制的差异、提示任务测量的特异性,以及在情境、任务目标和/或社会存在方面可能存在的一般差异。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验