• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using Radar Plots to Demonstrate the Accuracy and Precision of 6 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.使用雷达图展示6种血糖监测系统的准确性和精密度。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;11(5):966-969. doi: 10.1177/1932296817713026. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
2
Use of radar plots to compare the analytical performance of five blood glucose monitoring systems.使用雷达图比较五种血糖监测系统的分析性能。
Ther Deliv. 2019 Dec;10(12):783-792. doi: 10.4155/tde-2019-0046. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
3
Bolus Insulin Dose Error Distributions Based on Results From Two Clinical Trials Comparing Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.基于两项比较血糖监测系统的临床试验结果的胰岛素推注剂量误差分布
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;11(5):970-974. doi: 10.1177/1932296817713025. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
4
Fundamental Importance of Reference Glucose Analyzer Accuracy for Evaluating the Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (BGMSs).参考葡萄糖分析仪准确性对评估血糖监测系统(BGMSs)性能的根本重要性。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Jun 28;10(4):872-5. doi: 10.1177/1932296816634356. Print 2016 Jul.
5
Accuracy Beyond ISO: Introducing a New Method for Distinguishing Differences Between Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Meeting ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Requirements.超越ISO标准的准确性:引入一种新方法以区分符合ISO 15197:2013准确性要求的血糖监测系统之间的差异。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 May;12(3):650-656. doi: 10.1177/1932296818762509. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
6
Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system.血糖仪准确性和用户性能评估。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Mar;17(3):152-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0129. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
7
Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.在临床研究环境中,比较 Contour Next 与五种血糖监测系统在广泛血糖浓度范围内的准确性评估。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Jan;17(1):8-15. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0069.
8
Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements.基于ISO 15197要求,对四种血糖仪在目标用户和经过培训人员手中的准确性评估。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Apr;19(4):246-254. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0341. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
9
Accuracy Evaluation of 19 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Manufactured in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Multicenter Study.亚太地区生产的19种血糖监测系统的准确性评估:一项多中心研究。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;11(5):953-965. doi: 10.1177/1932296817705143. Epub 2017 May 8.
10
Performance of a new blood glucose monitoring system in the hands of intended users.新血糖仪在预期使用者手中的性能表现。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Sep;14(9):783-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0046. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and perinatal outcomes of non-communicable diseases in pregnancy in a regional hospital in Haiti: A prospective cohort study.海地一家地区医院妊娠期间非传染性疾病的患病率及围产期结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Glob Health. 2021 Apr 17;11:04020. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04020.
2
Accuracy Beyond ISO: Introducing a New Method for Distinguishing Differences Between Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Meeting ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Requirements.超越ISO标准的准确性:引入一种新方法以区分符合ISO 15197:2013准确性要求的血糖监测系统之间的差异。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 May;12(3):650-656. doi: 10.1177/1932296818762509. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
3
User Performance Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Applying ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Criteria and Calculation of Insulin Dosing Errors.应用ISO 15197:2013准确性标准对四种血糖监测系统的用户性能评估及胰岛素给药误差计算
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Apr;9(2):683-697. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0392-6. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
4
Accuracy Evaluation of 19 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Manufactured in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Multicenter Study.亚太地区生产的19种血糖监测系统的准确性评估:一项多中心研究。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;11(5):953-965. doi: 10.1177/1932296817705143. Epub 2017 May 8.
5
Strengths and Limitations of New Approaches for Graphical Presentation of Blood Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy Data.血糖监测系统准确性数据图形化呈现新方法的优势与局限
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1226-1230. doi: 10.1177/1932296817707292. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Strengths and Limitations of New Approaches for Graphical Presentation of Blood Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy Data.血糖监测系统准确性数据图形化呈现新方法的优势与局限
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1226-1230. doi: 10.1177/1932296817707292. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
2
How Should Blood Glucose Meter System Analytical Performance Be Assessed?血糖监测系统的分析性能应如何评估?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 31;10(1):178-84. doi: 10.1177/1932296815598599.
3
The surveillance error grid.监测误差网格。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):658-72. doi: 10.1177/1932296814539589. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
4
Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.在临床研究环境中,比较 Contour Next 与五种血糖监测系统在广泛血糖浓度范围内的准确性评估。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Jan;17(1):8-15. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0069.
5
Comparison of the numerical and clinical accuracy of four continuous glucose monitors.四种连续血糖监测仪的数值准确性与临床准确性比较。
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jun;31(6):1160-4. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2401. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
6
A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose.一种用于评估血糖测量不准确的临床意义的新型共识误差网格。
Diabetes Care. 2000 Aug;23(8):1143-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.8.1143.
7
Validity of linear regression in method comparison studies: is it limited by the statistical model or the quality of the analytical input data?方法比较研究中线性回归的有效性:它是受统计模型限制还是受分析输入数据质量限制?
Clin Chem. 1998 Nov;44(11):2340-6.
8
Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.评估血糖自我监测系统的临床准确性。
Diabetes Care. 1987 Sep-Oct;10(5):622-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.10.5.622.
9
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.评估两种临床测量方法之间一致性的统计方法。
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.

使用雷达图展示6种血糖监测系统的准确性和精密度。

Using Radar Plots to Demonstrate the Accuracy and Precision of 6 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.

作者信息

Pardo Scott, Dunne Nancy, Simmons David A

机构信息

1 Ascensia Diabetes Care, Parsippany, NJ.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;11(5):966-969. doi: 10.1177/1932296817713026. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1177/1932296817713026
PMID:28604065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5950999/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previously, fingertip capillary blood glucose measurements from the CONTOURNEXT (CN) blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) and 5 other BGMSs were evaluated in comparison with measurements from a reference YSI glucose analyzer. Here, we use Radar Plots to graphically represent the accuracy and precision results from the previous study, including whether they met ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria.

METHOD

A Radar Plot, a new method for capturing a distinct, single visualization of BGMS analytical performance, is a collection of concentric circles, each representing a particular magnitude of error. The center of the plot represents zero error (BGMS result is equivalent to reference result); as points are more distant from the center, the error increases, expressed in units of mg/dL or percentage for YSI values <100 and ≥100 mg/dL, respectively. The position of the data point above or below the horizontal line bisecting the plot indicates whether the BGMS measurement error was positive (BGMS result > YSI result) or negative (BGMS result < YSI result). Points within the "15-15 Zone," representing ±15 mg/dL or ±15% error, satisfy ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria.

RESULTS

The percentage of results within the 15-15 Zone ranged from 83.6% to 99.8% for the 6 BGMSs (99.6% for CN).

CONCLUSIONS

Radar Plots provide a different method for visually comparing the analytical performance of multiple BGMSs. The tight clustering of data points at the center of the CN Radar Plot illustrates the analytical performance of CN compared with 5 other BGMSs.

摘要

背景

此前,对Contour Next(CN)血糖监测系统(BGMS)和其他5种BGMS进行了指尖毛细血管血糖测量,并与参考YSI葡萄糖分析仪的测量结果进行了比较。在此,我们使用雷达图以图形方式展示先前研究的准确性和精密度结果,包括它们是否符合ISO 15197:2013准确性标准。

方法

雷达图是一种用于直观呈现BGMS分析性能的新方法,它由一组同心圆组成,每个圆代表特定的误差幅度。图的中心表示零误差(BGMS结果等同于参考结果);随着点离中心越远,误差越大,对于YSI值<100和≥100 mg/dL,误差分别以mg/dL或百分比为单位表示。数据点在平分该图的水平线之上或之下的位置表明BGMS测量误差是正(BGMS结果>YSI结果)还是负(BGMS结果<YSI结果)。位于“15 - 15区域”内的点,代表±15 mg/dL或±15%的误差,符合ISO 15197:2013准确性标准。

结果

6种BGMS在15 - 15区域内的结果百分比范围为83.6%至99.8%(CN为99.6%)。

结论

雷达图提供了一种直观比较多种BGMS分析性能的不同方法。CN雷达图中心的数据点紧密聚集,说明了CN与其他5种BGMS相比的分析性能。