Palini Simone, Stefani Silvia De, Primiterra Mariangela, Benedetti Serena, Barone Stefano, Carli Luca, Vaccari Enrico, Murat Ulug, Feichtinger Wilfried
IVF Unit, Cervesi Hospital Cattolica, Cattolica (RN), Italy.
Section of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino (PU), Italy.
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017 Jun 1;21(2):89-93. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170022.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a non-expensive, easy and fast technique (direct micro swim-up) for sperm preparation in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments without the use of centrifuge.
We carried out a multicentric study in which a total of 140 ICSI-cycles were included. Sibling oocytes were divided into two groups according to semen preparation procedures: group A, discontinuous gradients (DG) (oocytes n=668), and group B, direct micro swim-up (MSU) (oocytes n=660). We analyzed differences in some key performance indicators.
Fertilization rates were not statistically different between the DG and MSU groups (76.0% vs. 81.8%, respectively, p=0.248); while significant differences were found in blastulation rates per fertilized oocytes (41.7% vs. 58.5%, p=0.009), blastulation rates per D3 embryos (46.1% vs. 63.7%, p=0.045), and pregnancy rates (25.8% vs. 41.9%, p=0.045). The abortion rate was reduced in the MSU group as compared to DG, but not in a significant manner (12.9% vs. 29.4%, p=0.161).
The MSU procedure has the advantage of reducing costs, time and mismatches, while ensuring comparable, and in some cases, better results than DG treatments. This technique can therefore be used as an alternative method to other conventional semen treatments.
本研究旨在评估一种无需使用离心机的低成本、简便且快速的技术(直接微量上浮法)在卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)治疗中制备精子的效果。
我们开展了一项多中心研究,共纳入140个ICSI周期。根据精液制备程序,将同胞卵母细胞分为两组:A组,不连续梯度法(DG)(卵母细胞n = 668),B组,直接微量上浮法(MSU)(卵母细胞n = 660)。我们分析了一些关键性能指标的差异。
DG组和MSU组的受精率无统计学差异(分别为76.0%和81.8%,p = 0.248);而在每个受精卵母细胞的囊胚形成率(41.7%对58.5%,p = 0.009)、每个D3胚胎的囊胚形成率(46.1%对63.7%,p = 0.045)以及妊娠率(25.8%对41.9%,p = 0.045)方面存在显著差异。与DG组相比,MSU组的流产率有所降低,但差异不显著(12.9%对29.4%,p = 0.161)。
MSU程序具有降低成本、时间和错配的优势,同时能确保与DG治疗相当,且在某些情况下效果更好。因此,该技术可作为其他传统精液处理方法的替代方法。